Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On May 17, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Josh Thompson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 10:37:02 AM Kevan Miller wrote: On May 11, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: Kevan, Ugh. Thanks for looking at this. I guess it goes to show you can't

Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-17 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:45:00 AM Kevan Miller wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Josh Thompson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 10:37:02 AM Kevan Miller wrote: On May 11, 2012, at 3:17

Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-17 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aaron, Good thoughts, and thanks for asking the obvious. I vaguely remember considering using openssl instead of mcrypt when I initially wrote that code. I think the only reason I decided to use mcrypt was that it was symmetric key based, making it

Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-16 Thread Kevan Miller
On May 11, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevan, Ugh. Thanks for looking at this. I guess it goes to show you can't just trust that another project that says it is MIT licensed is *completely* MIT licensed. :( I'll figure out

Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-11 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That's my fault. I'll take care of it. I knew I checked that the license allowed it to be included in a release, but I forgot about having to include it in the LICENSE file. Dojo Toolkit (Academic Free License and in LICENSE file), phpseclib

Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On May 11, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That's my fault. I'll take care of it. I knew I checked that the license allowed it to be included in a release, but I forgot about having to include it in the LICENSE file. Dojo Toolkit

Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-11 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevan, Ugh. Thanks for looking at this. I guess it goes to show you can't just trust that another project that says it is MIT licensed is *completely* MIT licensed. :( I'll figure out a way to deal with it. If it works out that bcpowmod.php

Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On May 11, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevan, Ugh. Thanks for looking at this. I guess it goes to show you can't just trust that another project that says it is MIT licensed is *completely* MIT licensed. :( I'll figure out

Re: MIT licensed source code

2012-05-11 Thread Henry Schaffer
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On May 11, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevan, Ugh.  Thanks for looking at this.  I guess it goes to show you can't just trust that another project that