Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 01/09/08 00:44, Reinhard Nissl wrote:
#vdr
REMOTE=LIRC
LIRC_PUSHFREQ=64 # 1/s
LIRC_REPEATDELAY=250 # ms
LIRC_REPEATFREQ=32 # 1/s
#LIRC_REPEATTIMEOUT=500 # ms
#LIRC_RECONNECTDELAY=3000 # ms
LIRC_PRIORITYBOOST=1
Isn't there a way to have all this done in LIRC
On 02/09/08 13:53, Anssi Hannula wrote:
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 01/09/08 00:44, Reinhard Nissl wrote:
#vdr
REMOTE=LIRC
LIRC_PUSHFREQ=64 # 1/s
LIRC_REPEATDELAY=250 # ms
LIRC_REPEATFREQ=32 # 1/s
#LIRC_REPEATTIMEOUT=500 # ms
#LIRC_RECONNECTDELAY=3000 # ms
LIRC_PRIORITYBOOST=1
Isn't
Hi,
Ville Skyttä schrieb:
I think, the LIRC protocol misses a timestamp for each button
press. Or an even more favorable solution would be to put the
timeout and frequency processing into LIRC and have VDR to
process each key as it arrives, just like with the KBD remote.
Would using
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Reinhard Nissl wrote:
I think, the LIRC protocol misses a timestamp for each button
press. Or an even more favorable solution would be to put the
timeout and frequency processing into LIRC and have VDR to
process each key as it arrives, just like with the KBD
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Reinhard Nissl wrote:
Ville Skyttä schrieb:
Also, somewhat off topic: when running powertop[1] on my VDR box, I see
lircd waking up the CPU from idle about 1000 times a second while VDR is
connected to it:
Top causes for wakeups:
54.3% (988.1)
Reinhard Nissl wrote:
The attached patch allows now to define timeouts and frequencies
for example in Make.config, so there is no need to patch every
VDR version. Furthermore, frequencies are now defined in unit 1/s
instead of the unit ms (which defined the period), making values
more
Hi,
Ludwig Nussel schrieb:
Since the lirc thread doesn't do anything except waiting for input
most of the time it should be scheduled quickly anyways. Maybe the
useless select timeout destroys that advantage somewhat.
I don't think so. In my case (i. e. on my EPIA MII-6000E), there
are a lot
Hi,
Nicolas Huillard schrieb:
An option would be to lower priority of all threads except this one. I
guess only relative priority within VDR is important.
You can also raise priority in your init scripts (nice=-N), before
running VDR. This way every thread will have nice=0 priority, except
Reinhard Nissl a écrit :
Dominique Matz schrieb:
sound very good, but vdr as root do not :-(
do you think it is possible to use this or something else with an non
root user?
Well, only the LIRC_PRIORITYBOOST option requires root privileges
to work. If you don't have root privileges,
Nicolas Huillard wrote:
Reinhard Nissl a écrit :
Dominique Matz schrieb:
sound very good, but vdr as root do not :-(
do you think it is possible to use this or something else with an non
root user?
Well, only the LIRC_PRIORITYBOOST option requires root privileges
to work. If
10 matches
Mail list logo