On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Darren Salt
wrote:
> I demand that lucian orasanu may or may not have written...
>
>> how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained very
>> well any more?
Would be good, I returned to xinelibout / xine-lib with yavdr recently
after using a re
I demand that Tony Houghton may or may not have written...
> On 08/11/10 12:50, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
[snip]
> You can tell mplayer the exact ratio of your monitor and the exact ratio of
> the video on the command line and it correctly calculates how to display
> it. vdr-sxfe and vdr-fbfe have
I demand that lucian orasanu may or may not have written...
> how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained very
> well any more?
Feel free to help out, by all means...
--
| Darren Salt| linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| using Debian GNU/Linux |
On 8 November 2010 17:02, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On 08/11/10 12:50, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
>>
>> On 8 November 2010 13:59, lucian orasanu wrote:
>>>
>>> how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained
>>> very well any more?
>>>
>> My personal experience with mplayer is that
On 08/11/10 12:50, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
On 8 November 2010 13:59, lucian orasanu wrote:
how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained
very well any more?
My personal experience with mplayer is that it lacks proper aspect
ratio detection or guessing based on source th
On 2010-11-08 at 12:54 +0200, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
> On 6 November 2010 14:14, Udo Richter wrote:
> > AMD also supports vaapi, but progress is very slow, and its still very
> > buggy. Also, its limited to closed source drivers.
>
> Sounds similar to what nvidia went through.
AMD's progress h
On 8 November 2010 13:59, lucian orasanu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained very well
> any more?
>
>
My personal experience with mplayer is that it lacks proper aspect
ratio detection or guessing based on source that does not contain the
correc
Hello,
how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained very well
any more?
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 6 November 2010 14:14, Udo Richter wrote:
> Am 03.11.2010 10:06, schrieb Theunis Potgieter:
>> I'm considering to upgrade my current p3 system to a hdmi/optical
>> SPDIF and enough expansion slots to fill in dvb-s devices.
>
>> The unkown factor for me is, should I
>> consider a motherboard whe
Приветствую, Theunis
you can try
http://crystalhd.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/crystalhd/branches/xine-lib-1.2-vaapi
> I'm considering to upgrade my current p3 system to a hdmi/optical
> SPDIF and enough expansion slots to fill in dvb-s devices. I found
> plenty of motherboards with combinations
Am 03.11.2010 10:06, schrieb Theunis Potgieter:
> I'm considering to upgrade my current p3 system to a hdmi/optical
> SPDIF and enough expansion slots to fill in dvb-s devices.
> The unkown factor for me is, should I
> consider a motherboard where the Core i3 (System on Chip) has got a
> built in
FWIW, I've been using vdpau for HD htpc's for quite some time now and
my experience has been great. I think this is the case for most
people as well. However, xine-lib (especially vdpau) development
seems to be dead at the moment. There are known bugs and as far as I
can tell nobody is working o
I think your puzzle might become easier to solve if you consider using
PCIe SAT cards with dual tuners.
That will ease the expansion slot requirements.
I have just ordered a batch of Tevii S480
http://tevii.com/Products_S480_1.asp and I can let you know how they
work once I receive them.
Sorry, I
I'm considering to upgrade my current p3 system to a hdmi/optical
SPDIF and enough expansion slots to fill in dvb-s devices. I found
plenty of motherboards with combinations of 2x or 3x pci and 3x
pci-express. I can simply convert those pci-e to pci with an adapter
so that is not a problem. The unk
14 matches
Mail list logo
