Re: [vdr] Replay Problems with Extension HD

2009-09-05 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 03.09.2009 12:10, Falk Spitzberg wrote:
 Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 08:49 -0700 schrieb VDR User:
 Sounds like your question is more appropriate for the vendors customer
 support of that product.
 
 Definitly not, because my question ist only about the VDR core. I am
 just trying to find out what VDR does different when it transfers data
 to a device in live TV compared to replay from disk. That's completely
 independent from any device that's in use.
 
 Maybe that the eHD card is the only output device that crashes on VDR TS
 replays.

The following is related to recent developer versions of VDR 1.7.x.

In live mode (i.e. Transfer Mode, since the eHD has no tuner)
the TS data stream is written into a ring buffer by the receiving
device (e.g. a DVB-S(2) card) and from there it is sent to the
output device (the eHD plugin) through a call to PlayTs().
In this case every TS packet is sent to the output device separately.

During replay data is read from disk and stored in a ring buffer
that holds entire frames, which are just a sequence of TS packets
that make up one video frame (including audio). The output device's
PlayTs() is called with an entire frame.

The only real difference between live mode and replay I can see
is that in live mode TS packets are sent individually to the
output device, while in replay mode larger blocks of data are
sent. However, I don't see why this would cause the problems you
observe.

AFAIK the Reel plugin requires several patches to the core VDR
code, so there may well be things I simply don't know of, because
I haven't looked into the Reel code (yet).

Maybe it's ok if I use this opportunity to ask if somebody could
point me to a complete idiot's guide to installing the eHD software
(meaning the necessary software that goes into the eHD itself, as
well as the latest version of their plugin). I know, I could search
for this myself, but I'm sure there's somebody out there who knows
exactly where to find these ;-) Maybe I'll find the time to actually
bring up my eHD and adapt the plugin to the latest developer version
of VDR...

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Replay Problems with Extension HD

2009-09-05 Thread Lauri Tischler

Klaus Schmidinger wrote:


Maybe it's ok if I use this opportunity to ask if somebody could
point me to a complete idiot's guide to installing the eHD software
(meaning the necessary software that goes into the eHD itself, as
well as the latest version of their plugin). I know, I could search
for this myself, but I'm sure there's somebody out there who knows
exactly where to find these ;-) Maybe I'll find the time to actually
bring up my eHD and adapt the plugin to the latest developer version
of VDR...


Somewhat related question is, is there some solution to have
HD-VDR without X, other than eHD ?
All this hullaballoo with vdpau/X/xine etc.. is somehow stupid
if all you want is HD-STB.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Replay Problems with Extension HD

2009-09-05 Thread VDR User
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Lauri Tischlerl...@iki.fi wrote:
 Somewhat related question is, is there some solution to have
 HD-VDR without X, other than eHD ?

Not that I'm aware of but by no means have I researched that question
in depth. ;)

 All this hullaballoo with vdpau/X/xine etc.. is somehow stupid
 if all you want is HD-STB.

I'm not sure why you think vdpau is stupid if you want an HD stb.
Using vdpau gives you the ability to have HD on systems that normally
wouldn't have a chance at all, and it provides this at a very lost
cost.  The cheapest I've paid so far is $20 ($30-$10 MIR) for an
8400GS pci-e.  So for a mere $30 on average, your old system that
couldn't handle HD now can.  Stupid is the last thing I would describe
that as.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Replay Problems with Extension HD

2009-09-05 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 08:18 -0700, VDR User wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Lauri Tischlerl...@iki.fi wrote:
  Somewhat related question is, is there some solution to have
  HD-VDR without X, other than eHD ?
 
 Not that I'm aware of but by no means have I researched that question
 in depth. ;)
 
  All this hullaballoo with vdpau/X/xine etc.. is somehow stupid
  if all you want is HD-STB.
 
 I'm not sure why you think vdpau is stupid if you want an HD stb.
 Using vdpau gives you the ability to have HD on systems that normally
 wouldn't have a chance at all, and it provides this at a very lost
 cost.  The cheapest I've paid so far is $20 ($30-$10 MIR) for an
 8400GS pci-e.  So for a mere $30 on average, your old system that
 couldn't handle HD now can.  Stupid is the last thing I would describe
 that as.

Hm, I'd be happy to pay $150-200 for a hardware output card, similar to
the good old FF technotrend cards, if it could save me hours of messing
around with SVN bleeding edge code and trying to run exotic deinterlace
filters :)

I think that's what Lauri is getting at - the statement 'vdpau is
stupid' is perhaps a little inflammatory, but there must be more
time-efficient ways (other than the eHD card which is now hard to
obtain)

gdh



___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Replay Problems with Extension HD

2009-09-05 Thread VDR User
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Gavin Hamillg...@acentral.co.uk wrote:
 I'm not sure why you think vdpau is stupid if you want an HD stb.
 Using vdpau gives you the ability to have HD on systems that normally
 wouldn't have a chance at all, and it provides this at a very lost
 cost.  The cheapest I've paid so far is $20 ($30-$10 MIR) for an
 8400GS pci-e.  So for a mere $30 on average, your old system that
 couldn't handle HD now can.  Stupid is the last thing I would describe
 that as.

 Hm, I'd be happy to pay $150-200 for a hardware output card, similar to
 the good old FF technotrend cards, if it could save me hours of messing
 around with SVN bleeding edge code and trying to run exotic deinterlace
 filters :)

I think there's a misconception about using vdpau.  While there are a
small few who have problems (as is the case with any
software/hardware), most users are able to get vdpau working with
little or no hassle at all.  For me it takes 1min to download
xine-vdpau, 7 minutes to compile it, 1min to download xine-ui cvs,
1min to compile it.  Nvidia drivers take about 2mins to download and
1min to install.  Less then 15 minutes _no patching_ is all it takes.
 Actually there is one patch come to think of it since I use xine-lib
1.1 instead of 1.2, it's xine-0.9.3/patches/xine-lib.patch...  In any
case it's never taken hours of time.  Been really straight forward and
simple for the most part.

When I bought my first nexus-s, I bought it for the exact reason you
mentioned.  Wanted a simple fast solution that didn't involve much (or
any) work on the linux side since I'd never used linux before.  And at
the time a nexus was also cheaper then building a new pc.  However,
those days are gone.  You're willing to pay $150-$200 for a dedicated
card that does only one thing.  I recently paid $130 total for an
Nvidia Ion system that will become my completely silent and fanless
main HDTV VDR box that's about the size of a Nintendo Wii.  That's
where the market is going.  You'll see less and less dedicated cards
(especially FF DVB cards) because the cost to produce them is too high
and the market for such a product too small.  There's no profit to be
made.  That's a conversation for a different thread however. ;)

 I think that's what Lauri is getting at - the statement 'vdpau is
 stupid' is perhaps a little inflammatory, but there must be more
 time-efficient ways (other than the eHD card which is now hard to
 obtain)

It sounds like the eHD is the most expensive solution in all areas;
time, money, patching, etc.  Whereas, vdpau seems to be at the other
end of the spectrum being the least expensive, easiest, and so on.

I've got 3 boxes running vdpau, all with different hardware and my
experience has been the same with each setup.. It was a piece of cake
and took almost no time to get going.  Now I guess it's the guy who
had a horrible experience turn to tell his story. ;)

Regards,
Derek

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Replay Problems with Extension HD

2009-09-05 Thread Niels Wagenaar
Op Za, 5 september, 2009 18:11, schreef VDR User:
 -- SNIP --
 It sounds like the eHD is the most expensive solution in all areas;
 time, money, patching, etc.  Whereas, vdpau seems to be at the other
 end of the spectrum being the least expensive, easiest, and so on.


Depends on how you look at it. I got mine for almost 1,5 years now and
I've been able to see and hear HDTV without problems. Yes, the other
plugins for mediaplayback seem to have problems with a vanilla VDR setup.
But currently I use ReelVDR anyway and it works like a charm and without
the problems I have with a vanilla VDR setup ;)

 I've got 3 boxes running vdpau, all with different hardware and my
 experience has been the same with each setup.. It was a piece of cake
 and took almost no time to get going.  Now I guess it's the guy who
 had a horrible experience turn to tell his story. ;)


I've been experimenting with VDPAU for a while. And yes, it's the next big
thing when it comes to hardware accelerated playback. But since I need to
put in an additional NVIDIA based videocard with Purevideo HD
capabilities, I rather use my onboard intel for X.org and stick to my eHD
until I have the money to get me a Atom based device with an ION chipset
:)

 Regards,
 Derek


Regards,

Niels Wagenaar



___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] How do I listen to a channel's soundtrack and it's audio description at the same time?

2009-09-05 Thread Udo Richter

On 02.09.2009 07:49, John Robinson wrote:

I would very much like to
hear the main programme's soundtrack and the audio description track at
the same time, but at the moment, I can only hear one or the other - not
both.


Hmmm, interesting task. However, I don't think that this is possible 
currently. Output devices are currently designed to handle one audio 
channel, not multiple at the same time. Mixing them to one would require 
decompressing and re-compressing them and would probably introduce 
timing issues.


There may be a quirked solution like playing back the second channel 
externally, like connecting to it using mplayer+streamdev, however thats 
not very comfortable.


The best solution is probably a dedicated plugin that connects to live 
view and plays the secondary audio track in parallel. However I don't 
think that such a plugin exists currently.



Cheers,

Udo

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] How do I listen to a channel's soundtrack and it's audio description at the same time?

2009-09-05 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi,

John Robinson schrieb:

 One member of this list very helpfully
 suggested that, to switch between the programme's main sound track and
 the audio description track, I can hit the 'Audio' key, then the right
 cursor key and then the 'Audio' key again.  This does, indeed switch
 from the main programme sound track to the audio description track, but
 it only lets me hear one or the other, not both.

Maybe I told you too much details of the audio menu so you got a
bit confused. Your key sequence 'Audio', 'right cursor', 'Audio'
may indeed do, what you experience. Let me explain:

1.) 'Audio' opens the audio menu.
2.) 'right cursor' selects the right channel of the current
stereo track.
3.) 'Audio' switches to the next track (audio description) but
stays at right channel of the audio description track.

At the moment, there is no programme running where I could verify
my conclusions, but for me it looks like that (referencing the
explanations of my previous email): the audio description track
provides two mono channels which appear as left and right channel
of the stereo audio description track. The left channel seems to
provide a mono audio signal of the main programmes sound track,
while the right channel provides audio description only.

So simply omitting step two 'right cursor' from your key sequence
should do the trick and present both mono channels at the same
time. The only drawback of the current solution is, that you hear
the main programme sound track only on the left side of your
audio equipment and the audio description only on the right side.

Mixing both mono channels together and presenting the result as a
stereo signal is feasible by output plugins but would require
some way to tell the output plugin to activate this mode. The
best would be if VDR's user interface would allow to select such
a mode and provide that selection to the output plugin.

Suggestion for extending the user and output plugin interface: In
the audio menu, the left and right keys select between left,
stereo and right channel. A further mode 'combined' should be
added which can be reached by pressing 'right' when the right
channel is selected. The current audio channel selection is
provided in the output plugin interface via the method
SetAudioChannelDevice. The parameter values 0, 1 or 2 represent
stereo, left or right channel. A further parameter value 3 would
represent 'combined' mode. For compatibility and the most common
use case, 'combined' mode should need to be activated in VDR's
setup menu, i. e. it is not available by default.

Maybe Klaus can drop a few words about this extension.

Bye.
-- 
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl
mailto:rni...@gmx.de

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr