Re: [vdr] Prefer non-CI equipped adapters for FTA channel recording

2012-02-23 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 23.02.2012 06:47, Heikki Manninen wrote: Hello, here's my current setup: 1 x Satelco DVB-C Budget with CI + CAM (Conax CIv1) 1 x Satelco DVB-C Bidget wuthout CI When recording FTA channels VDR seems to sometimes select the one adapter with CI. It would make sense to always try to use

Re: [vdr] Prefer non-CI equipped adapters for FTA channel recording

2012-02-23 Thread Heikki Manninen
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:26, Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de wrote: On 23.02.2012 06:47, Heikki Manninen wrote: Hello, here's my current setup: 1 x Satelco DVB-C Budget with CI + CAM (Conax CIv1) 1 x Satelco DVB-C Bidget wuthout CI When recording FTA channels VDR seems to

Re: [vdr] Prefer non-CI equipped adapters for FTA channel recording

2012-02-23 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 23.02.2012 10:21, Heikki Manninen wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:26, Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de wrote: On 23.02.2012 06:47, Heikki Manninen wrote: Hello, here's my current setup: 1 x Satelco DVB-C Budget with CI + CAM (Conax CIv1) 1 x Satelco DVB-C Bidget wuthout CI

Re: [vdr] Prefer non-CI equipped adapters for FTA channel recording

2012-02-23 Thread Claus-Peter Behrens
- Original Message - From: Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de To: vdr@linuxtv.org Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [vdr] Prefer non-CI equipped adapters for FTA channel recording On 23.02.2012 10:21, Heikki Manninen wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at

Re: [vdr] SoftHDDevice

2012-02-23 Thread fnu
Dudes, did set up a basic VDR on Ubuntu Precise yesterday and it did work as expected. Install a minimal Ubuntu from alternate installer, add apt-get install xorg nvidia-current, VDR e.g. from our yaVDR PPA (ppa:yavdr/unstable-vdr, ppa:yavdr/main) incl. vdr-plugin-softhddevice and you're

[vdr] Intelligent management of simulcast DVB-S2 / DVB-T channels

2012-02-23 Thread Dominic Evans
I remember seeing patches for marking channels as identical in terms of EPG (so e.g., a DVB-S version of the channel can automatically share the EPG entries from the DVB-T version), but has anyone worked on a patch for identifying simulcasting channels, or even had some preliminary design thoughts

Re: [vdr] SoftHDDevice

2012-02-23 Thread VDR User
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:38 AM, fnu v...@auktion.hostingkunde.de wrote: Dudes, did set up a basic VDR on Ubuntu Precise yesterday and it did work as expected. Install a minimal Ubuntu from alternate installer, add apt-get install xorg nvidia-current, VDR e.g. from our yaVDR PPA

Re: [vdr] Intelligent management of simulcast DVB-S2 / DVB-T channels

2012-02-23 Thread Magnus Hörlin
On 02/23/2012 04:50 PM, Dominic Evans wrote: I remember seeing patches for marking channels as identical in terms of EPG (so e.g., a DVB-S version of the channel can automatically share the EPG entries from the DVB-T version), but has anyone worked on a patch for identifying simulcasting

Re: [vdr] Intelligent management of simulcast DVB-S2 / DVB-T channels

2012-02-23 Thread Udo Richter
Am 23.02.2012 19:36, schrieb Magnus Hörlin: This is an interesting topic and I have had exactly the same ideas. But I think this violates Klaus's Keep it simple philosophy and (as usual) I tend to agree with him. If you've ever read the algorithm that picks the best possible device for a

Re: [vdr] Prefer non-CI equipped adapters for FTA channel recording

2012-02-23 Thread Udo Richter
Am 23.02.2012 10:30, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: Just check what's actually happening in the GetDevice() function. ... and try with minimal plugins, they might introduce side effects. OSDTeletext for example is known to have such side effects on device selection. Cheers, Udo