Yep... looks that way. Must be the E-Book
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Dave P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
> > Are these channel numbers broadcast in a way that's covered in the
> > DVB SI standard? If so, I see no reason why VDR shouldn't
On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Are these channel numbers broadcast in a way that's covered in the
> DVB SI standard? If so, I see no reason why VDR shouldn't (optionally)
> use them when sorting channels. But they sure have no place in
> channels.conf, in there I would stil
On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Laz wrote:
> This is the sort of feature which would be ideal as a plugin, i.e. only
> those who are interested need to compile and use it. As to whether it is
> possible to obtain the relevant LCN info from the DVB stream is possible
> from a plugin or not (I'd have th
On 10/07/08 02:18, Malcolm Caldwell wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:11 +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> On 10/06/08 11:06, Laz wrote:
>>> On Monday 06 Oct 2008, Frank Scherthan wrote:
Laz schrieb:
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2008, Gavin Hamill wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:10 +0100, Da
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 13:48 +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 10/07/08 10:26, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On my Sky digibox "Sky One" is on chanel number 106 - but I never saw
> that number in any programme announcement on Sky. The only say "... on Sky
> One",
> and not "... on channel 106".
>
> So
On 10/07/08 10:26, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:14 +0100, Andrew Herron wrote:
>> I totally agree. LCN's here in the UK and in Australia is central to
>> ordinary users experience of DVB (aka Freeview here in the UK). At
>> present we use scan commands -u switch to generate the LC
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2008, Malcolm Caldwell wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:11 +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> > I don't think it makes any sense to put actual channel numbers into
> > each channel's line in channels.conf. For one, what if different
> > providers want to use the same channel numbe
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:14 +0100, Andrew Herron wrote:
> I totally agree. LCN's here in the UK and in Australia is central to
> ordinary users experience of DVB (aka Freeview here in the UK). At
> present we use scan commands -u switch to generate the LCN data.
> Having vdr handle this form of ch
I totally agree. LCN's here in the UK and in Australia is central to
ordinary users experience of DVB (aka Freeview here in the UK). At present
we use scan commands -u switch to generate the LCN data. Having vdr handle
this form of channel numbering internally would seem to be the better
option bu
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:11 +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 10/06/08 11:06, Laz wrote:
> > On Monday 06 Oct 2008, Frank Scherthan wrote:
> >> Laz schrieb:
> >>> On Sunday 05 Oct 2008, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:10 +0100, Dave P wrote:
> >>> On another Freeview specific
On Monday 06 October 2008, Laz wrote:
> On another Freeview specific note, I'd love to have my channels
> renumbered to their "proper" Freeview numbers. At the moment, I have to
> go through and move them about by hand every time something changes! I
> don't think there is currently any support fo
On 10/06/08 11:06, Laz wrote:
> On Monday 06 Oct 2008, Frank Scherthan wrote:
>> Laz schrieb:
>>> On Sunday 05 Oct 2008, Gavin Hamill wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:10 +0100, Dave P wrote:
>>> On another Freeview specific note, I'd love to have my channels
>>> renumbered to their "proper" Fre
On Monday 06 Oct 2008, Frank Scherthan wrote:
> Laz schrieb:
> > On Sunday 05 Oct 2008, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:10 +0100, Dave P wrote:
> >
> > On another Freeview specific note, I'd love to have my channels
> > renumbered to their "proper" Freeview numbers. At the moment,
Laz schrieb:
> On Sunday 05 Oct 2008, Gavin Hamill wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:10 +0100, Dave P wrote:
> On another Freeview specific note, I'd love to have my channels renumbered
> to their "proper" Freeview numbers. At the moment, I have to go through
> and move them about by hand every
On Sunday 05 Oct 2008, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:10 +0100, Dave P wrote:
> > A few months ago I posted a VDR patch to implement support for
> > Freeview+, the cut-down version of TV-Anytime (ETSI TS 102 323)
> > broadcast in the UK.
> >
> > I've prepared a new version against V
On Sunday 05 October 2008, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> Interesting stuff :)
>
> I don't suppose it's possible to implement this as a plugin rather than
> a patch to VDR's core? Is there not enough core exposed via the plugin
> API?
>
> I can't see the patch going into VDR core any time because it's focu
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:10 +0100, Dave P wrote:
> A few months ago I posted a VDR patch to implement support for Freeview+,
> the cut-down version of TV-Anytime (ETSI TS 102 323) broadcast in the UK.
>
> I've prepared a new version against VDR 1.6.0-2, and included a simple Perl
> script which
A few months ago I posted a VDR patch to implement support for Freeview+,
the cut-down version of TV-Anytime (ETSI TS 102 323) broadcast in the UK.
I've prepared a new version against VDR 1.6.0-2, and included a simple Perl
script which automatically creates timers for all of the programmes in a
18 matches
Mail list logo
