Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-05-19 Thread Anssi Hannula
Tobi wrote: > Anssi Hannula wrote: > >> The kernel headers should be fixed to use strict types (patches >> available). See my earlier reply on the issue: >> http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2009-March/019783.html > > You're right. Thanks for the pointer! I've seen this weeks ago and thought > it

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-09 Thread Tobi
Anssi Hannula wrote: > The kernel headers should be fixed to use strict types (patches > available). See my earlier reply on the issue: > http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2009-March/019783.html You're right. Thanks for the pointer! I've seen this weeks ago and thought it would have already made

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-09 Thread Anssi Hannula
Tobi wrote: > Hi! > > Recent DVB driver releases (now in Kernel 2.6.29) cause trouble compiling > VDR (see snippet A below). > > The common solution to this seems to be to add a "-D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES". > > It felt wrong somehow and I didn't liked this, so I tried another > solution, which is

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-09 Thread Tobi
Tobi wrote: > I've forwarded the header issue to linux-media. If there will be any > answers / comments about it, I'll keep you informed. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-me...@vger.kernel.org/msg04232.html Seems this is more of a general issue. As I digged a little bit deeper, I saw, that

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-09 Thread Tobi
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > Well, so what is the preferred method of making the DVB driver developers > aware of bugs, if one doesn't want to suffer from all the traffic on the > linux-media list? I've forwarded the header issue to linux-media. If there will be any answers / comments about it, I'l

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-09 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 04/09/09 09:25, Niels Wagenaar wrote: > Op Do, 9 april, 2009 08:29, schreef Matthias Becker: >>> According to my information (a message on the linux-dvb mailinglist), >>> the >>> old mailinglists (V4L and DVB) are now merged into linux-media. >> what does "merged" mean? Are Posts on the "old" li

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-09 Thread Niels Wagenaar
Op Do, 9 april, 2009 08:29, schreef Matthias Becker: >> According to my information (a message on the linux-dvb mailinglist), >> the >> old mailinglists (V4L and DVB) are now merged into linux-media. > > what does "merged" mean? Are Posts on the "old" list > replicated to the new one? > No. Merge

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-08 Thread Matthias Becker
> According to my information (a message on the linux-dvb mailinglist), the > old mailinglists (V4L and DVB) are now merged into linux-media. what does "merged" mean? Are Posts on the "old" list replicated to the new one? Regadrs, Matthias ___ vdr mail

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-08 Thread Niels Wagenaar
Op Wo, 8 april, 2009 15:04, schreef Klaus Schmidinger: > On 04/08/09 15:00, Matthias Becker wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is the linux-dvb ML still "alive"? >> maybe http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-media is read more >> frequently > > That one has way too much non DVB related traffic for me. > >

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-08 Thread Andy Carter
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 14:04:39 Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 04/08/09 15:00, Matthias Becker wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is the linux-dvb ML still "alive"? > > maybe http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-media is read more > > frequently > > That one has way too much non DVB related traffic

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-08 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 04/08/09 15:00, Matthias Becker wrote: > Hi, > > is the linux-dvb ML still "alive"? > maybe http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-media is read more > frequently That one has way too much non DVB related traffic for me. Klaus > 2009/4/8 Klaus Schmidinger : >> On 04/08/09 01:21, Tobi

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-08 Thread Matthias Becker
Hi, is the linux-dvb ML still "alive"? maybe http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-media is read more frequently Regards, Matthias 2009/4/8 Klaus Schmidinger : > On 04/08/09 01:21, Tobi wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Recent DVB driver releases (now in Kernel 2.6.29) cause trouble compiling >> VDR (s

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-08 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 04/08/09 01:21, Tobi wrote: > Hi! > > Recent DVB driver releases (now in Kernel 2.6.29) cause trouble compiling > VDR (see snippet A below). > > The common solution to this seems to be to add a "-D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES". > > It felt wrong somehow and I didn't liked this, so I tried another >

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-08 Thread Tobi
Tony Houghton wrote: > I used -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES but compilation then failed on the use of > __u8 in . ISTR reading that might only be a problem > for 64-bit. I didn't had this problem. VDR 1.6.0 and 1.7.4 compile fine with 2.6.29 and GCC 4.3 on x86_64. It works also with the latest drivers

Re: [vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-07 Thread Tony Houghton
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:21:27 +0200 Tobi wrote: > Recent DVB driver releases (now in Kernel 2.6.29) cause trouble compiling > VDR (see snippet A below). > > The common solution to this seems to be to add a "-D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES". > > It felt wrong somehow and I didn't liked this, so I tried a

[vdr] Compilation issues with recent DVB header files vs libc6

2009-04-07 Thread Tobi
Hi! Recent DVB driver releases (now in Kernel 2.6.29) cause trouble compiling VDR (see snippet A below). The common solution to this seems to be to add a "-D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES". It felt wrong somehow and I didn't liked this, so I tried another solution, which is to have any libc6 includes ap