On 04/27/2013 04:58 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
...
Of course with chance of source choosing (if more than one tuner is
used).
I don't understand what you mean here.
I thought about the possibility from diseqc.conf:
# A line containing space separated integer numbers, terminated with a ':'
On 22.04.2013 20:56, Lars Hanisch wrote:
Am 22.04.2013 14:28, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
...
or even
virtual void Drive(bool Left) {}// true = left, false = right
virtual void Step(int Steps) {} // <0 = left, >0 = right
virtual void SetLimit(bool Left) {} // true = left, false
On 23.04.2013 13:34, Ales Jurik wrote:
On 04/23/2013 01:08 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
...
I'm also thinking of allowing something in the form of
* 11700 V 9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 P
* 9 V 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 P
* 11700 H 9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 P
* 9 H
On 04/23/2013 01:08 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
...
I'm also thinking of allowing something in the form of
* 11700 V 9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 P
* 9 V 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 P
* 11700 H 9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 P
* 9 H 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 P
(no
Al 23/04/13 12:41, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
>>
>> So maybe it should be better called "SetCurrentPosition"
>
> The specs on the 0x6F command are a little vague.
> What do you suggest should be sent to a DiSEqC rotor?
> Something like
>
> 6F nn 00 00
>
> where 'nn' is the number of t
On 22.04.2013 18:12, Füley István wrote:
On 2013.04.21. 15:54, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
(...)
The question I have now is: will it be enough to have *one* single
positioner
in any given setup, or are there actually users who have more than one
positioner?
(...)
Klaus
Currently I have 4 tune
On 22.04.2013 13:30, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 22/04/13 11:12, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
virtual void Recalc(int Number)
///
What would this actually be good for?
Imagine that the dish moved but the counter didn't work, or simply
there's some slack accumulated, so the actual posit
Better to support multi-positioners. Makes options much more flexible.
On 4/21/2013 5:54 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based
on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual
base class cPositioner, which defin
Am 22.04.2013 14:28, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
>...
> or even
>
> virtual void Drive(bool Left) {}// true = left, false = right
> virtual void Step(int Steps) {} // <0 = left, >0 = right
> virtual void SetLimit(bool Left) {} // true = left, false = right
>
> ?
If you would go thi
On 2013.04.21. 15:54, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
(...)
The question I have now is: will it be enough to have *one* single
positioner
in any given setup, or are there actually users who have more than one
positioner?
(...)
Klaus
Currently I have 4 tuners, each of them is connected to several
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
wrote:
>> I think I would be interested to have possibility for multiple positioners
>> later, if VDR would only support it.
>
> There doesn't seem to be such a big demand for multiple positioners,
> so I guess I'll take the easy way and assume th
Al 22/04/13 14:28, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
> So what do you folks think?
I don't have any preference wrt Left/Right East/West.
My last (and only) set top box with integrated positioner was analogue
and used East/West, but I don't remember if it had any provision for the
southern hemisp
On 22.04.2013 13:38, Antti Hartikainen wrote:
...
I think I would be interested to have possibility for multiple positioners
later, if VDR would only support it.
There doesn't seem to be such a big demand for multiple positioners,
so I guess I'll take the easy way and assume there is only one.
On 22.04.2013 13:35, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 22/04/13 11:11, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
I'd suggest a parameter with the number of steps to move (and for "step"
I mean a "pulse", not the next/previous stored satellite position).
I don't see the need for a "number of steps".
Well, I
On 22.04.2013 12:37, Mike Booth wrote:
I have two positioners one for a ku dish and a second for a C Band dish.
The general desire for multiple positioners appears to be rather
low, so I guess I won't do the extra work to handle such cases.
Would it be possibles to cater for the southern hemi
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:46:34AM +0300, Teemu Suikki wrote:
> 2013/4/21 Klaus Schmidinger :
> > I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based
> > on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual
> > base class cPositioner, which defines all the func
Al 22/04/13 11:11, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
>> I'd suggest a parameter with the number of steps to move (and for "step"
>> I mean a "pulse", not the next/previous stored satellite position).
>
> I don't see the need for a "number of steps".
Well, I use it from time to time. Say I move
Al 22/04/13 11:12, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
>> virtual void Recalc(int Number)
>>///> Number
>>///
> What would this actually be good for?
Imagine that the dish moved but the counter didn't work, or simply
there's some slack accumulated, so the actual position and the
registere
I have two positioners one for a ku dish and a second for a C Band dish.
Would it be possibles to cater for the southern hemispere by a switch.
Your East is my West.
Mike
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
On 21.04.2013 20:36, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
One more observation
virtual void StepEast(void) {}
///< Move the dish one step to the east.
virtual void StepWest(void) {}
///< Move the dish one step to the west.
I'd
On 21.04.2013 20:17, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
Any visual feedback will be done via the channel display of the skin, by
comparing
CurrentLongitude() to TargetLongitude(). And of course any section
filtering will
start only after the target posit
On 21.04.2013 20:43, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 21/04/13 20:36, En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
One more observation
virtual void StepEast(void) {}
///< Move the dish one step to the east.
virtual void StepWest(void) {}
2013/4/21 Klaus Schmidinger :
> I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based
> on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual
> base class cPositioner, which defines all the functions necessary to
> control the positioner. An implementation of cDis
Al 21/04/13 20:36, En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
> Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
>
> One more observation
>
>> virtual void StepEast(void) {}
>> ///< Move the dish one step to the east.
>> virtual void StepWest(void) {}
>> ///< Move the dish one st
Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
One more observation
> virtual void StepEast(void) {}
> ///< Move the dish one step to the east.
> virtual void StepWest(void) {}
> ///< Move the dish one step to the west.
I'd suggest a parameter with the number of st
Al 21/04/13 20:17, En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
> Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
>
>>
>> Any visual feedback will be done via the channel display of the skin, by
>> comparing
>> CurrentLongitude() to TargetLongitude(). And of course any section
>> filtering will
>> start o
Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
>
> Any visual feedback will be done via the channel display of the skin, by
> comparing
> CurrentLongitude() to TargetLongitude(). And of course any section
> filtering will
> start only after the target position has been reached.
Mmh, how w
I currently only have one dish with motor, but if the VDR allows it I might
consider a second one.
Although in that setup I'm not sure that I would use them on just one
system. I would definitely add another receiver, maybe with a possibility
to share between the two motorized dishes.
On Sun, Apr
I don't have a dish motor myself but FWIW I know a few people who do
and they all have only one in their setup.
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
21.04.2013 15:54, Klaus Schmidinger kirjutas:
The question I have now is: will it be enough to have *one* single
positioner
in any given setup, or are there actually users who have more than one
positioner?
Hi and thanks for bringing this feature to the job list!
One is enough for me.
--
br,
On 21.04.2013 15:40, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 21/04/13 14:54, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based
on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual
base class cPositioner, which defines all the functions n
Al 21/04/13 14:54, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
> I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based
> on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual
> base class cPositioner, which defines all the functions necessary to
> control the positioner.
I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based
on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual
base class cPositioner, which defines all the functions necessary to
control the positioner. An implementation of cDiseqcPositioner will
allow control of "
33 matches
Mail list logo
