On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:34:14AM +0200, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Another thing: Will it have a proper framebuffer ? I mean the main
> problem of the current FF cards is that you can't do a lot of things
> because of the very limited OSD. ScumVM etc pp would be a really nice
> thing.
The OSD
Georg Acher schrieb
[ ... snip ... ]
>Well, you don't have to buy the card if you would wake up in cold sweat
>every once in a while because of the small binary-only part in the kernel.
>
>But IMO you can wait until the end of time for a full open source HDTV card
>with HDMI output. If you have t
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 08:29:19PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
> Georg Acher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) Don't use a HDMI transmitter and ignore the market demand.
>
> the market never "demanded" an encrypted data stream on the HDMI cable,
>From a technical view this is right, bu
Georg Acher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Don't use a HDMI transmitter and ignore the market demand.
the market never "demanded" an encrypted data stream on the HDMI cable,
and it is clearly the only reason they are picky about their secrets
within that driver. THEY want their chips be supporte
On 30 Jun 2007, at 14:44, Georg Acher wrote:
As a small hardware manufacturer you have three possibilities:
1) Don't use a HDMI transmitter and ignore the market demand.
2) Use a HDMI transmitter, care about the NDA and deliver binary
modules for
controlling it.
3) Use a HDMI transmitter,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:05:18PM +0200, Stefan Lucke wrote:
> > Actually there's not much closed source that affects the usage. On the PC
> > side there's none, on the card side it's only the driver for the HDMI-chip
> > in the kernel
>
> Damm, that's the nvidia way.
>
> They decide on which
I demand that Torgeir Veimo may or may not have written...
[snip]
> When some parts of the kernel becomes gpl3, which it might,
That can't usefully happen so long as there are GPLv2-only components: there
would be no common licence for the whole kernel, which would make it
undistributable without
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:29:23PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
> Anssi Hannula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If I understood correctly, you only need proprietary parts for the
> > kernel that runs *in* the card. The kernel running on your actual
> > system does not need proprietary par
Anssi Hannula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I understood correctly, you only need proprietary parts for the
> kernel that runs *in* the card. The kernel running on your actual
> system does not need proprietary parts, leaving you free to use a
> different kernel.
yes, but as there is linux als
Stefan Lucke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They decide on which kernel it runs. If I need for some other device
> a different kernel which they don't / won't support, I'm left alone.
that's exactly what the GPL tries to prevent.
> To my opinion that is a nogo way.
> I doubt if that's compatible w
On 30 Jun 2007, at 12:17, Anssi Hannula wrote:
If I understood correctly, you only need proprietary parts for the
kernel that runs *in* the card. The kernel running on your actual
system
does not need proprietary parts, leaving you free to use a
different kernel.
The binary provision for
Stefan Lucke wrote:
> On Friday 29 June 2007 18:24, Georg Acher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:21:45AM -0700, Jeremy Jones wrote:
>>
>>> I checked out the latest Reelbox testing svn code and browsed the code to
>>> see if it supports this device. I didn't look too thoroughly but it appears
On Friday 29 June 2007 18:24, Georg Acher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:21:45AM -0700, Jeremy Jones wrote:
>
> > I checked out the latest Reelbox testing svn code and browsed the code to
> > see if it supports this device. I didn't look too thoroughly but it appears
> > the reelbox-0.9.0 p
Georg Acher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:21:45AM -0700, Jeremy Jones wrote:
>
>> I checked out the latest Reelbox testing svn code and browsed the code to
>> see if it supports this device. I didn't look too thoroughly but it appears
>> the reelbox-0.9.0 plugin does support it. It looks
On 29 Jun 2007, at 20:55, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
bluetooth
ˆMˆMˆMˆMˆMˆMray
--
Torgeir Veimo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 29 Jun 2007, at 17:24, Georg Acher wrote:
Actually there's not much closed source that affects the usage. On
the PC
side there's none, on the card side it's only the driver for the
HDMI-chip
in the kernel (otherwise Silicon Image would shoot us) and of
course the
firmwares for the inter
On 29 Jun 2007, at 16:21, Jeremy Jones wrote:
On 6/29/07, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29 Jun 2007, at 10:35, Georg Acher wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:45:12PM -0700, Jeremy Jones wrote:
Is there any information regarding availability or pricing on the
HDTV PCI
card ?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:21:45AM -0700, Jeremy Jones wrote:
> I checked out the latest Reelbox testing svn code and browsed the code to
> see if it supports this device. I didn't look too thoroughly but it appears
> the reelbox-0.9.0 plugin does support it. It looks like communication to
> th
On 6/29/07, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29 Jun 2007, at 10:35, Georg Acher wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:45:12PM -0700, Jeremy Jones wrote:
Is there any information regarding availability or pricing on the HDTV PCI
card ? I have been waiting a long time for an HD MPEG-2/4
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:13:53PM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> Is this the card in question?
> http://www.directupload.net/images/070503/CjsyApL2.jpg
It is.
--
Georg Acher, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~acher
"Oh no, not again !" The bowl of petunias
On 29 Jun 2007, at 10:51, Georg Acher wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:47:58AM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
There is other hardware that does mpeg2/4/h.264 decoding, the lacking
piece is always proper open source drivers.
Will this hardware have open source drivers / open specifications?
W
On 29 Jun 2007, at 10:51, Georg Acher wrote:
With a few exceptions (eg the driver for the HDMI chip) it will be
open
source. Actually, there's a Linux running on the card...
Ok. Does the card have only HDMI output, or also other, eg. component
or DVI? Would it be possible to use it withou
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:47:58AM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> There is other hardware that does mpeg2/4/h.264 decoding, the lacking
> piece is always proper open source drivers.
>
> Will this hardware have open source drivers / open specifications?
With a few exceptions (eg the driver for
On 29 Jun 2007, at 10:35, Georg Acher wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:45:12PM -0700, Jeremy Jones wrote:
Is there any information regarding availability or pricing on the
HDTV PCI
card ? I have been waiting a long time for an HD MPEG-2/4 decoder
with HDMI
and this sounds promising :-)
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:45:12PM -0700, Jeremy Jones wrote:
> Is there any information regarding availability or pricing on the HDTV PCI
> card ? I have been waiting a long time for an HD MPEG-2/4 decoder with HDMI
> and this sounds promising :-)
Availability not earlier than August/September
On Friday 29 June 2007 07:45, Jeremy Jones wrote:
> On 6/27/07, Georg Acher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:17:03PM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> > > On 27 Jun 2007, at 20:51, Igor wrote:
> > > >Hello
> > > >
> > > >http://reel-multimedia.com/rmm-english/netceiver.html
> >
On 6/27/07, Georg Acher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:17:03PM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>
> On 27 Jun 2007, at 20:51, Igor wrote:
>
> >Hello
> >
> >http://reel-multimedia.com/rmm-english/netceiver.html
> >here's a good platform for future hdtv-vdr
> >Are you agree ? :)
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:17:03PM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>
> On 27 Jun 2007, at 20:51, Igor wrote:
>
> >Hello
> >
> >http://reel-multimedia.com/rmm-english/netceiver.html
> >here's a good platform for future hdtv-vdr
> >Are you agree ? :)
>
> Well, what's missing there is info about the "1
28 matches
Mail list logo
