Re: [vdsm] link state semantics

2012-12-05 Thread Igor Lvovsky
- Original Message - From: Antoni Segura Puimedon asegu...@redhat.com To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Cc: Alona Kaplan alkap...@redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:32:34 PM Subject: [vdsm] link state semantics Hi list! We are working on the new 3.2 feature for

Re: [vdsm] link state semantics

2012-12-05 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:10:00PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:32:34PM -0500, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: Hi list! We are working on the new 3.2 feature for adding support for updating VM devices, more specifically at the moment network devices. There is

Re: [vdsm] link state semantics

2012-12-05 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:21:16PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:10:00PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:32:34PM -0500, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: Hi list! We are working on the new 3.2 feature for adding support for updating VM

Re: [vdsm] link state semantics

2012-12-05 Thread Livnat Peer
On 05/12/12 14:21, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:10:00PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:32:34PM -0500, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: Hi list! We are working on the new 3.2 feature for adding support for updating VM devices, more specifically at the

Re: [vdsm] Fedora, udev and nic renaming

2012-12-05 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:25:48AM -0500, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Thanks for this verbose description. I don't think using libguestfs is the solution for this. Yeah, it seems like a hack that would be quite hard to maintain for all supported guest operating systems. Fixing qemu to accept

Re: [vdsm] link state semantics

2012-12-05 Thread Adam Litke
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:25:48AM -0500, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: - Original Message - From: Igor Lvovsky ilvov...@redhat.com To: Antoni Segura Puimedon asegu...@redhat.com Cc: Alona Kaplan alkap...@redhat.com, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Wednesday, December

Re: [vdsm] Host bios information

2012-12-05 Thread Adam Litke
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:05:21AM +0200, ybronhei wrote: Today in the Api we display general information about the host that vdsm export by getCapabilities Api. We decided to add bios information as part of the information that is displayed in UI under host's general sub-tab. To

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Adam Litke
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:23:16PM +0200, ybronhei wrote: As part of an issue that if you push start for 200vms in the same time it takes hours because undefined issue, we thought about moving the collection of statistics outside vdsm. Thanks for bringing up this issue. I think this could be

Re: [vdsm] VDSM tasks, the future

2012-12-05 Thread Saggi Mizrahi
I'm sorry but your email client messed up the formatting and I can't figure out what are you comments. Could you please use text only emails. - Original Message - From: ybronhei ybron...@redhat.com To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com Cc: Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com, engine-devel

Re: [vdsm] Host bios information

2012-12-05 Thread ybronhei
On 12/05/2012 04:32 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:05:21AM +0200, ybronhei wrote: Today in the Api we display general information about the host that vdsm export by getCapabilities Api. We decided to add bios information as part of the information that is displayed in UI

Re: [vdsm] Host bios information

2012-12-05 Thread Adam Litke
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:25:10PM +0200, ybronhei wrote: On 12/05/2012 04:32 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:05:21AM +0200, ybronhei wrote: Today in the Api we display general information about the host that vdsm export by getCapabilities Api. We decided to add bios

Re: [vdsm] [VDSM][RFC] hsm service standalone

2012-12-05 Thread ybronhei
On 12/03/2012 07:22 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: HSM is not a package it's an application. Currently it and the rest of VDSM share the same process but they use RPC to communicate. This is done so that one day we can actually have them run as different processes. HSM is not something you import,

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Itamar Heim
On 12/05/2012 04:42 PM, Adam Litke wrote: I wanted to know what do you think about it and if you have better solution to avoid initiate so many threads? And if splitting vdsm is a good idea here? In first look, my opinion is that it can help and would be nice to have vmStatisticService that runs

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Adam Litke
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:30:10PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 04:42 PM, Adam Litke wrote: I wanted to know what do you think about it and if you have better solution to avoid initiate so many threads? And if splitting vdsm is a good idea here? In first look, my opinion is that it

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Itamar Heim
On 12/05/2012 08:57 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:30:10PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 04:42 PM, Adam Litke wrote: I wanted to know what do you think about it and if you have better solution to avoid initiate so many threads? And if splitting vdsm is a good idea

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Adam Litke
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:01:24PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 08:57 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:30:10PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 04:42 PM, Adam Litke wrote: I wanted to know what do you think about it and if you have better solution to avoid

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Itamar Heim
On 12/05/2012 10:16 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:01:24PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 08:57 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:30:10PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 04:42 PM, Adam Litke wrote: I wanted to know what do you think about it

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Adam Litke
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 10:16 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:01:24PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 08:57 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:30:10PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 04:42 PM,

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Itamar Heim
On 12/05/2012 10:33 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 10:16 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:01:24PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 08:57 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:30:10PM +0200,

Re: [vdsm] moving the collection of statistics to external process

2012-12-05 Thread Adam Litke
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:51:23PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 10:33 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 10:16 PM, Adam Litke wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:01:24PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: On 12/05/2012 08:57 PM,

Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API

2012-12-05 Thread Tony Asleson
On 12/04/2012 03:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and I think it's time to talk a bit. I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and concentrate about how the API looks and how you use it. First major change is

Re: [vdsm] [VDSM][RFC] hsm service standalone

2012-12-05 Thread Shu Ming
Saggi, It might be that the wiki page was a bit confusing. Let me articulate it again and help others to understand the intention of this project. 1) Now, HSM files here refers to the files under vdsm/storage which are storage service related code. And other VDSM files call into those