On 11/29/2011 06:29 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> After discussing MOM / VDSM integration at length, two different strategies
> have
> emerged. I will call them Plan A and Plan B:
>
> Plan A: MOM integration at the OS/Packaging level
> Plan B: MOM integration as a new VDSM thread
I think a form of pla
On 12/02/2011 04:15 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 03:08:24AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:05:55AM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
>>> On 11/29/2011 06:29 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>>>> After discussing MOM / VDSM integr
On 12/05/2011 03:55 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:07:43PM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
>> On 12/02/2011 04:15 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 03:08:24AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:05:55AM +0200, Dor L
On 12/08/2011 12:33 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:42:24PM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2011 03:55 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:07:43PM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
>>&g
Hi,
I read the design here and I like to make sure that the future road map
will expand beyond the current scope.
The current design totally rely on libvirt and does not parse the
content of the PCI addressing. That's really really basic. The user
should be able to specify pci slot allocation
On 04/20/2012 02:23 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
So although I believe that when we create a gluster volume or an
ovirt storage domain then indeed we shouldn't need a lot of low
level commands, but it would appear to me that not allowing for
more control when needed is not going to work and that
On 04/30/2012 07:30 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 04/29/2012 04:19 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
To: "Gal Hammer"
Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 7:1
On 05/18/2012 04:28 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 05/17/2012 11:05 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/17/2012 06:55 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/15/2012 07:35 PM, Andrei Vakhnin wrote:
Yair
Thanks for an update. Can I have KVM hypervisors also
On 05/21/2012 06:15 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 05/18/2012 04:28 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 05/17/2012 11:05 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/17/2012 06:55 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
I am looking at GlusterFS integration with QEMU which
On 06/19/2012 08:12 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Deepak C Shetty"
To: "Ryan Harper"
Cc: "Saggi Mizrahi" , "Anthony Liguori" ,
"VDSM Project Development"
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:58:47 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [virt-node] VDSM as a general purpose virt h
On 10/03/2012 09:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
My personal preference is using the VDSM debug hook to inject code to a running
VDSM and dynamically add whatever you want.
This means the code is part of the test and not VDSM.
That's might be good for debugging/tracing but not for full functional
On 10/10/2012 11:23 AM, Noam Slomianko wrote:
Regarding qemu-kvm memory allocation behaviour, this is the clearest
explanation I found:
"Unless using explicit hugepages for the guest, KVM will
*not* initially allocate all RAM from the host OS. Each
page of RAM is only allocated when the guest O
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 04:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>>> If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
>>> around
>>> collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets of
>>> requirements
>>> are strictly overlapping or if the
On 11/16/2011 02:07 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can th
On 11/23/2011 07:09 AM, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:53:33PM -0500, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Adam Litke"
>>> To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 4:29:41 PM
>>> Subject: MOM integration questions
>
On 11/17/2011 09:58 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 10:34 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
>> On Thursday 17 November 2011 02:48:50 Michael Roth wrote:
>>> I've tried to summarize the pros/cons, points, and proposals outlined in
>>> this thread at the following wiki:
>>>
>>> http://www.ovirt.org/wik
On 11/25/2011 12:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:40:07PM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
>> On 11/17/2011 09:58 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
>>> On 11/17/2011 10:34 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 17 November 2011 02:48:50 Michael Roth wrote:
On 11/24/2011 01:12 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 11/23/2011 07:09 AM, Adam Litke wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:53:33PM -0500, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Litke"
> To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.
18 matches
Mail list logo
