e, so ut on the ~/builder will work
as well, because the structure under the ~/builder is the same as /.
- Original Message -
From: "Zhou Zheng Sheng"
To: "VDSM Project Development"
Cc: "Yaniv Bronheim"
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:25:46 AM
Subject: Re:
"
To: "VDSM Project Development"
Cc: "Yaniv Bronheim"
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:25:46 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] VDSM test unit running path
on 03/11/2013 14:56, Yaniv Bronheim wrote:
> Hey Shu,
> Personally when I run specific unit test I prefer to run it witho
on 03/11/2013 14:56, Yaniv Bronheim wrote:
Hey Shu,
Personally when I run specific unit test I prefer to run it without installing
vdsm package, means locally from my development directory.
I develop on my major machine and install the package on testing environments
for verification, so durin
practice but I'm not sure, we need
more opinions about that issue..
- Original Message -
From: "Shu Ming"
To: "VDSM Project Development"
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 8:18:35 AM
Subject: [vdsm] VDSM test unit running path
Hi,
Now, The VDSM test unit is expected
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:18:35PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now, The VDSM test unit is expected to run in a un-installed enviornment
> and use hackVDSM() to fake modules importing. hackVDSM() is pretty
> tricky for other modules to be added because of the dependency order. I
> would propos
Hi,
Now, The VDSM test unit is expected to run in a un-installed enviornment
and use hackVDSM() to fake modules importing. hackVDSM() is pretty
tricky for other modules to be added because of the dependency order. I
would propose to run the VDSM unit tests in a installed VDSM path which
is the sam