On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:15 AM, SACHIN ARORA sachin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Need to auto generate a report from windows master server.
I have created a small batch file below :
cd c:\program files\veritas\netbackup\bin\admincmd
bpimagelist -client usaroc9050as070.gepc.xerox.com -U
appliance (or the software) is worth the price is to evaluate it. You may
even find, like we did, that it's suitable and justifiable for some of your
data but not others.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
primary VMware storage on our NetApps and cut our storage requirements in
half.
We've got 2 similar sites doing de-dupe on their archives on the NetApps -
one gets 66% and another 13%.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
Thanks all, but I was specifically referring to the De-Duplication provided
by NBU7.
Same answer - it's essentially the PureDisk engine and it's going to depend
on the data stream. We use PureDisk. It's great for office documents and
lousy for TIFFs.
.../Ed
. AFS will continue to be supported with NetBackup
5.x clients running under 5.x or 6.0 servers.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedi http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
Do you have SELinux set to enforcing? If so, there's a bunch of work that
you need to do. See http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/337118.htm
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:34 AM
/NBUESVR_digest.htm
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
will happen if you log a call on
your Windows 2008 R2 6.5.x master server? Are you going to be satisfied
with them telling you to downgrade away from R2 or upgrading to NUB 7.0
before they help you? Is your management happy with suspect and guess?
I know mine wouldn't be.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP
to work for Symantec and they test a LOT more things than I could
ever hope to test. It's not quite infinite, but hundreds of them outnumber
the 3 of us on our storage team.
Kudos. I suspect you work for the government,
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ed+wilts+netbackup
The first link returned will show
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Martin, Jonathan jmart...@intersil.comwrote:
I, and many other members of this forum work on quasi-supported or
completely unsupported systems every day. We understand the risks involved,
we take necessary precautions, and often we succeed.
And many other
SSO allows you to share drives between a master server and multiple media
servers. It's not meant to share drives between 2 master servers. A master
server controls access to all of the tape drives within a robot - you can't
have 2 masters with this control.
I don't know how the logical
a perfectly valid 32k backup for the original backups.
This is similar to the questions we see about status 1 completion codes.
For some, it's a problem. For others, it isn't. That's why they pay us the
big bucks - to figure out which is which.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
your recovery to look
like. Don't focus on the BACKUPS - focus on the RECOVERIES. If you have no
plans to recover, don't bother backing it up in the first place.
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
using NetBackup. That's
what we do with most of our SQL and Oracle databases
As always, after you've put your backup solution together, test a recovery
of that database and see if it still works.
A Google search for netbackup sql server express will certainly help you.
…/Ed
Ed
.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Symantec just published their first Late Breaking News article for 7.0.
Keep an eye on the LBN updates as you get closer to your update.
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/341271.htm
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com
be. It's close, but
from an enterprise support perspective, close isn't good enough.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:44 AM, McDonald II, James F.
james.f.mcdonald...@saic.com wrote:
I was recently informed that someone I work with has had files stored on
our file server that should not have been there. They have since deleted
the original files, but the copies that are stored in
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:36 AM, lookn4me netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com
wrote:
I plan to replicate a production environment on a test server, but I need
to change the master server name as the test environment will not be
isolated. Anyone out there have success with the process? The
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:24 PM, lookn4me netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com
wrote:
Yes you correct, I am looking to copy the catalog and its database to the
new host in order to test upgrading and locate break/fix issues prior to the
upgrade. I need to have as much of the master server
One way to solve this problem is to use encryption. Use a key-per-tape
procedure and when the tape images expire, destroy the key. There will be
no way to ever get that data back and the tape can sit in your scratch pool
for years.
.../Ed
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:01 PM, bruceephx
Vmware licensing is also simplified. You don't need a license per guest OS
type any more. One license will let you back up both Windows and Llinux
guests on the same hardware.
.../Ed
sent from my Google-powered phone
On Feb 17, 2010 3:10 AM, mfrank netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Wilcox, Donald A (GE, Research)
wil...@ge.com wrote:
I have recently had an issue with BMR for Oracle Linux. The BMR
portion of the backup will fail. I was told by Symantec that if I changed
the /etc/release file to something other that oracle linux it
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:48 AM, hsyashwanth
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
The features of netbackup 7 looks interesting. I would like to try the beta
version. Can any one let me know where I can download the new version?
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/341272.htm
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Mohammed Ahmed ahmed.itengin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am planning to upgrade VERITAS netbackup version from 6.0 to 6.5 i would
require to have procedure in upgrading the server version, Post upgrade
issues noticed, how to update clients, and how can i setup NOM
I'm not a VMware guy but I believe that vStorage is part of VMware. It's up
to NetBackup to use those APIs to do the backups. That's all part of
NetBackup 7 which has gone FA and is due to go GA in another week or so. It
looks really, really good and once we get NBU 7 installed (probably March
from SPARC to x64. I can't comment on whether or not it will work, but I'm
pretty sure it's unsupported. You can/should open a case with Symantec to
verify.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
I've been using ncftp for just about forever and it's still working fine. I
just checked using ncftp within cygwin on my home desktop.
ncftp ...ckup_Enterprise_Server show
anon-password NcFTP@
auto-ascii
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jimenez, Daniel daniel.jime...@owb.comwrote:
I would like to get an idea on how I can setup a low cost AES 256
encryption on Backup Exec. It can be software or hardware based. Any
assistance would be appreciated.
The current versions of Backup Exec support
Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
Thanks,
Scott
Ed Wilts ewi...@ewilts.org 12/17/2009 1:45 PM
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:18 PM, smpt sm...@peppas.gr wrote:
Dedupe works really good. But be careful
-term historical data, then you'll need Analytics
(or a 3rd party product).
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
(CLI, Java, Windows Admin Console, OpsCenter). I
personally think that we'll always have a CLI but that OpsCenter will
replace the other two. I have no facts to back that up.
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
It really is as simple as that. You don't need to use the required
interface stuff at all. Let the network stacks do the routing.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:18 PM, smpt sm...@peppas.gr wrote:
Dedupe works really good. But be careful, it is not the solution for all
systems .
It's also not free. You will pay for each terabyte of pre-duped data.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact
that
basic backups and restores will work. I would expect that extended
attributes or ACLs may or may not. FlashBackup is extremely unlikely to
work. Those are my guesses but if ext4 is important to you, look it up in
the official compat docs.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi
on 6.5.4.
Still the multiple channels was not working. Does the Database Server needs
a reboot?
Oracle needs to be restarted after new agents are installed.
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
bpexpdate -copy
The key thing to remember is that NetBackup doesn't like to manipulate tapes
- it likes to manipulate images.
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Watkins, Robert (AITC)
robert.watk...@va.gov wrote:
Load it on 1 master,
NO - do not load NOM on a master server. Dedicate a single server to be
your new NOM server and follow the manual on how to install and configure
it. The install is not for the week -
what version of the agents are
installed. There are NetBackup technotes out there that detail all of this.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Janardhana Babu Donga
jbdo
Nov 30 14:09
NB_6.5.5.alpha_5_337775.tar
ncftp ...ckup_Enterprise_Server
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:47 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net wrote
between the initial restore and when it's
resumed.
There are ways to preview the restore to tell you which tapes are needed but
why bother with a preview - you either need the restore or you don't.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
the new policy of EV with agent.
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/329620.htm
See also the related documents listed at the bottom of that page.
/Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
set of scripts.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
of the virtual machines and
virtual servers in your environment.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Mark Glazerman
mark.glazer...@spartech.com wrote:
Is backing VMware machines feasible to a remote VMware Backup proxy
server over a T1 line ?
We’re talking about 4 Virtual hosts with about 200GB of data between
them.
Doing some simple math, a T1 at
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
I think I posted a script to do this a long time ago. Unfortunately the
file naming pattern changed with NBU 6.x and I don't know if I have an
archaic version of the script lying around. I'll let you search the
archives for something named along the lines of validate_image. It requires
cygwin
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/336166.htm
Have fun!
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
where they do help.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:34 PM, RyanV netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote:
BMR doesn't support Windows 2008 clients at this time.
This is coming - it's on the tentative roadmap for the Denali release
(7.0.1, available around Aug/2010, subject to change).
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP
at the current location will be controlling both physical
tapes drives as well as a virtual tape drive at the old site.
If I configure both tape libraries with the same range of volume labels,
will this confuse the Media Manager Volume Database?
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi
.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
might be another story. Now I
would expect you (or somebody) to eventually test this. And then report
back, because I'm thinking about a Solaris to Linux migration too :-)
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu
install Win2008 on the bare metal, we can push
over 100MB/sec to disk. Put a Win2008 guest in ESX on the same hardware and
the disk I/O tops out at about 30MB/sec.
Your idea is a good one (in theory), but be very cautious about performance
along the way.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
on them.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
if there is a preference or is this now
considered an option if you do not have the drivers available?
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo
-clerk-0930-2009_3139333436.htm
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
OK, my comment is for WS08, not WS08 R2.
For R2 support, Urs appears to be correct - 6.5.5 as per this technote:
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/333092.htm
.../Ed
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Ed Wilts ewi...@ewilts.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:03 AM, brad.hillebrand
) that this document needs to be
updated for currently supported versions of NetBackup.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Jimenez, Daniel daniel.jime...@owb.comwrote:
I found the script below that pulls the policy and storage device from
Netbackup but it is for Unix and was wondering if anyone knows how to
translate this to Windows?
http://cygwin.org/
1/2 a :-)
Seriously, we
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Victor Engle victor.en...@gmail.comwrote:
Is there a command to get a backup a backup history for a specific
client over a specific time frame?
It really depends on the level of detail you want.
Your best general purpose bet is something like Aptare
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:03 AM, brad.hillebrand brad.hillebr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Server and Client version 6.5.3 installs fine. In management console,
added as a x64 windows2008 client. Host properties show as OS “UNKNOWN 6”
and OS Type is “OTHER”. On regular 2008 servers, it shows as OS
list.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
I would guess that the line terminations are getting you. Windows has cr/lf
and Unix just lf. Since you're backing up the file in a binary fashion,
when you restore it to another platform, your terminations aren't going to
match what the OS expected.
This is also one of the reasons that
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Hi,
Have you looked at bpdbjobs?
bpdbjobs
bpdbjobs -most_columns
bpdbjobs -all_columns
Other than that,
bperror -backstat -by_statcode -U
Will give you a nice summary.
Justin.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
). There are very rare cases where this will not work (e.g. a
scheduler bug that doesn't schedule the job in the first place).
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
supposed to do well. Unfortunately, it's not supposed to
do much :-(
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
. You need to ask the
master.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
the hostname?
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
needed to
enable the flashbackup-windows policy type?
I'm not a Hyper-V customer, but the Advanced/Enterprise Client is required
for all of the other Flashbackup policies so I'd be surprised if it wasn't
for Hyper-V.
The online compatibility lists will probably tell you for sure...
.../Ed
Ed
and put 1 entry per line.
2. bpsetconfig -h $CLIENTNAME $SERVERFILENAME
Check the list with:
bpgetconfig -M $CLIENTNAME SERVER
That might work from the media server...
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu
that you visit the 6.5 upgrade portal:
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290185.htm
The 6.0 upgrade portal is at
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/285223.htm
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:06 AM, annym netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote:
Hello community, this last weekend I had an error on one tape. This tape is
in a tape robot and the error indicates media error for this tape.
The problem however is that I had hoped that Netbackup should handle
your media servers will typically be bigger/better/faster than the clients.
Get bigger and you're into something like the DataForts. Get even bigger
and you go for something like the Brocade encrypting blade/switch.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
any enterprise monitoring services, say NetIQ, it
complains because a service is configured for AUTOMATIC but is stopped.
So we either have to train our admins to ignore these stupid messages or set
the service to manual or disabled.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi
client setup. It's not like anybody can accidentally start using
the SAN client...
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Spellacy, Sean sean.spell...@viha.cawrote:
I have recently added to my job list a Fileserver cluster made up of four
win2k3r2 machines with roughly 5TB of data on them, millions of files.
As expected this takes a relative eternity to backup.
I was hoping to
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Kalusche, Dan
dan.kalus...@andersencorp.com wrote:
Just wondering if anyone's run into this one…
I've upgraded the master to 6.5.4 to bypass a HP patch problem on some
clients. I've attempted to upgrade the NOM server to 6.5.4, but it'll hang
about 3/4 of
data classifications of SLPs anyway, so it doesn't bother me
much except these timeouts should not be happening. I have a similar issue,
although worded differently, running the java admin console directly on the
master.
Any ideas which daemon is hosed?
Thanks,
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD
:-)
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
but it's not a
mandatory requirement yet.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
is that high that you are saturating a
mirrored disk, then you've got major memory constraint issues to deal with.
Fault tolerance is the least of your problems.
Disks do exactly 3 things:
1. They read
2. They write
3. They fail
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
-bit. 64-bit Windows ha's been a
more stable platform for us than 32-bit.
Microsoft's general direction also appears to towards 64-bit.
My recommendation would be to go with 64-bit unless you have a compelling
reason to keep it at only 32-bit.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi
the Windows Open File Backup options and apply them.
man bpclient
e.g.: bpclient -client newserver.example.com -add -WOFB_enabled 0
-WOFB_FIM 1
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
with
bpsetconfig -h.
2. Connect to the client (bpsetconfig)
a. Set timeouts to the standards that you have in your environment.
b. Under the Windows Client - Client Settings
1. Set the Communications buffer size to 1024 kilobytes
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP
recover very often (if ever,
unless you have a good DR plan).
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
dadsadhoc
Thanks,
Sushil
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
requests.
The problem is non-trivial because although you may get notified of a single
mount request, the actual job may need multiple tapes (and DSSU-based
images) so you need to search for them all.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
misleading is that your performance will vary based on
everything else that's going on as well as writing really small images to
tape. Performance analysis is really hard in NetBackup - many of the tools
you would like to have simply aren't there.
Good luck,
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP
, are they?
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
,and then the clients,
especially those using special agents like this one.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:07 AM, zeelander
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
Is there a Mac client for Netbackup 6.5?
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/303344.htm
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Ed Wilts ewi...@ewilts.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ed Wilts ewi...@ewilts.org wrote:
It's popping up...
[snip]
I expect that there are still quite a few packages to go so be patient a
little longer...
It sounds like people are starting
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Harpreet SINGH
harpreet_si...@ctl.creative.com wrote:
Dear Mr. Ed Wilts,
May I know where I can download ver 6.5.4.
Had you followed the link I gave to the 45-day digest summary,
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/NBUESVR_digest.htm, you would have
found
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ed Wilts ewi...@ewilts.org wrote:
It's popping up...
[snip]
I expect that there are still quite a few packages to go so be patient a
little longer...
It sounds like people are starting to download before the whole kit has been
uploaded and it's doing nasty
NB_6.5.4.winnt.x86_326385.exe
I expect that there are still quite a few packages to go so be patient a
little longer...
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
. These are not
legal and if you're discovered to have cheated, you will likely lose your
certification.
The purpose the certification is to prove that you understand the topics,
not that you memorized the answers to a pre-defined set of questions.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
letters are the same between the
systems. The vir1 policy would back up just the volumes that are floating
between the hosts - for example, E: F:. You have to make sure you don't
try to back up the data volumes in the OS policy or you will get a status
71.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewilts at ewilts.org (ewilts at ewilts.org)
This is the problem, the business owners don't care about the OS or local
drives. They do an SQL back up and have it written on one of the floating
drives. The only thing we are backing up
101 - 200 of 963 matches
Mail list logo
