Have you checked if you are running out of memory or swap space?
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: 29 March 2010 15:41
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Hi,
Is anyone using de-dupe?
What kind of savings are you seeing?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
We are running, NBU 6.5.4 on HP-UX 11-31. Is there a way to find out
when a policy first started running?
Wayne BeDour
Unix System Administrator
PH: 248-447-1739
Internet: wbed...@lear.com
**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**
This E-mail message and any
We use Data Domain here (now owned by EMC which also has Avomar). The
DDs do get really high deduplication ratios and have been fairly stable.
I'd definitely recommend that kind of dedupe (there are different
kinds). This kind does the dedupe on the DD itself rather than
deduping on your
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.comwrote:
Is anyone using de-dupe?
What kind of savings are you seeing?
This is completely dependent on the input data streams. We've got some data
sets that get great de-dupe and some that absolutely suck. We de-dupe our
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.comwrote:
Is anyone using de-dupe?
What kind of savings are you seeing?
This is completely dependent on the input data streams. We've got some data
sets that get great de-dupe and
Thanks all, but I was specifically referring to the De-Duplication provided
by NBU7.
Same answer - it's essentially the PureDisk engine and it's going to depend
on the data stream. We use PureDisk. It's great for office documents and
lousy for TIFFs.
.../Ed
Maybe.
/opt/openv/netbackup/db/class
This is where the policies live.
You can look here and if you can see the difference between creation and
modification you might be able to tell.
Me I make a point of when creating a new policy I put a date in that active
field so I know when I
Ich werde ab 01.04.2010 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
11.04.2010.
Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
You can also use bpimagelist to show you the oldest active backup in the
catalogue. Although it doesn't give you the date for when the policy was first
created, it will tell you how far back you can possibly go with that policy.
bpimagelist -d 01/01/1970 -policy policy_name -U
Brian J.
Are you seeing 55MB/sec to the switch but only 10MB/sec to the tape
drive at the same time? If so, are you sure there is no other traffic on
that HBA?
Or is the backup spiking to 50MB/sec when it first starts and then
slowing down to 10MB/sec? This is normal behavior from my perspective as
Hello,
Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master
Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the
following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted
job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a LTO3 tape but
the
I have not had that problem.
My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb
knows it is a lto4)
As you have both types in your library I would check that the media
type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an
lto4.
I have a master/media, a
Judy,
I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and
LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes
to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is
reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the
A side note. Not sure if this make a difference. There is a firewall
between my master\media and media server. All the standard ports have
been configured and all backups and restores work fine today.
Dwayne
From:
I seem to remember reading in the book the type HAD to be HCART=lto4
(not sure if I read that somewhere or it just stuck in my head)
Try deleting one of your tapes, and get it added back in as an HCART -
your lto4 tape drives should already be HCART ( if not you will have to
change them as
Judy,
I will let you know what I find out.
Thanks
Dwayne Adams
From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
[mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:55 AM
To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:
I can confirm that this is not the case.
I think your problem is that both of your media types (LTO3 and LTO4)
are set to HCART3... you need to have that separated out, and you need
to have your drives configured the same. If your LTO3 media is HCART3
and your LTO4 media are HCART, then you
I set it up in a small test environment, and started backing up three clients
into a deduplication pool exclusively. 2 windows and 1 linux system
The first pass wasn't that impressive, maybe a 5% to 10% de-dup ratio and it
took a bit longer than just streaming that same data to tape or disk.
Scott,
1343 is a LTO4 tape. I just made the change and tested. I set one of
my LTO4 drives to HCART, created a new HCART Storage Unit, changed the
policy to use that storage unit, deleted the tapes and ran an inventory
as HCART to the Scratch Pool. Same outcome.
4/1/2010 10:11:01 AM -
Dwayne,
Can you show the errors in the bptm log with verbose set to 5?
Also do you have any system errors showing scsi errors for the problem?
len
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne
Sent: Thursday, April
Our environment, NBU 6.5.4 Master and separate media server running on
HP-UX 11-31 with a Data Domain VTL and MSL6060 tape library. Can I add
another media server and use the data domain vtl along with the other
media server? Do I have to use SSO to share the vtl or will the master
take care of
Wayne,
I'm assuming you are using the DD as VTL, not using OST. If so, yes,
using SSO you can share the VTL drives with the other media server. I
believe you have to have the SSO license on all media servers that share
the drives. It used to be sold on a per drive basis, not sure how they
Dwayne,
This happens when RObot Device host is not the true EMM
server. you can determine the true EMM server by executing nbemmcmd
-listhosts (the top host will be the true EMM server).
Thank you
Surjit Sedeora
Sr. Systems Engineer
NGIT
Adams, Dwayne wrote:
Scott,
1343
With the Raw Partition restore for flashbackup-windows we have seen you
need to set the restore option to overwrite. I haven't used the
Standard flashbackup policy
On 3/31/2010 6:16 PM, khester wrote:
We have been trying to restore about 1.5 TB of data to our File Server which
is a newly
25 matches
Mail list logo
