Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 50 for all backups
Have you checked if you are running out of memory or swap space? -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: 29 March 2010 15:41 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 50 for all backups Ok anything logged in the Windows Clients? Did you enable logging, as per the document I sent over to you? Anything changed in your NetBackup environment? For example, clients upgraded to a newer version or Maintenance Pack? Usually, from own experience, I see this when the NetBackup processes close down unexpectedly or terminate in an unusual manner. I know very little about Solaris, but I know there is some sort of ADM/Message folder - I think Is there anything in there?? Sorry I cannot help much more. Simon -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of NBU Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:07 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Error 50 for all backups Hi, Client OS are Win2008/2003/Solaris 9/10 etc Master is on Solaris 10 +-- |This was sent by qureshiu...@rediffmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Hi, Is anyone using de-dupe? What kind of savings are you seeing? Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Can I find out when a policy first ran?
We are running, NBU 6.5.4 on HP-UX 11-31. Is there a way to find out when a policy first started running? Wayne BeDour Unix System Administrator PH: 248-447-1739 Internet: wbed...@lear.com ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this E-mail message from your computer. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
We use Data Domain here (now owned by EMC which also has Avomar). The DDs do get really high deduplication ratios and have been fairly stable. I'd definitely recommend that kind of dedupe (there are different kinds). This kind does the dedupe on the DD itself rather than deduping on your server and pushing it to storage so doesn't have any more impact on server CPU/memory than going to tape. Of course you still need to make sure you're planning for offsite storage as they like any other medium will fill up eventually - we typically run ours around 90% of capacity even doing dedupe. DD does offer the ability to put units at an offsite location and transfer directly from the onsite ones to the offsite ones but we don't use that (yet). On top of everything else restores from the DDs as opposed to tape are incredibly fast. You'd want to be sure you look into how you're connecting. DDs offer fibre channel but it is an addon cost. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 6:28 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe? Hi, Is anyone using de-dupe? What kind of savings are you seeing? Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. -- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.comwrote: Is anyone using de-dupe? What kind of savings are you seeing? This is completely dependent on the input data streams. We've got some data sets that get great de-dupe and some that absolutely suck. We de-dupe our primary VMware storage on our NetApps and cut our storage requirements in half. We've got 2 similar sites doing de-dupe on their archives on the NetApps - one gets 66% and another 13%. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.org Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ed Wilts wrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.comwrote: Is anyone using de-dupe? What kind of savings are you seeing? This is completely dependent on the input data streams. We've got some data sets that get great de-dupe and some that absolutely suck. We de-dupe our primary VMware storage on our NetApps and cut our storage requirements in half. We've got 2 similar sites doing de-dupe on their archives on the NetApps - one gets 66% and another 13%. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.org Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts Hi, Thanks all, but I was specifically referring to the De-Duplication provided by NBU7. Yes, we use Data Domains too, they are good units =) Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Thanks all, but I was specifically referring to the De-Duplication provided by NBU7. Same answer - it's essentially the PureDisk engine and it's going to depend on the data stream. We use PureDisk. It's great for office documents and lousy for TIFFs. .../Ed ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Can I find out when a policy first ran?
Maybe. /opt/openv/netbackup/db/class This is where the policies live. You can look here and if you can see the difference between creation and modification you might be able to tell. Me I make a point of when creating a new policy I put a date in that active field so I know when I started using it. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of BeDour, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 8:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Can I find out when a policy first ran? We are running, NBU 6.5.4 on HP-UX 11-31. Is there a way to find out when a policy first started running? Wayne BeDour Unix System Administrator PH: 248-447-1739 Internet: wbed...@lear.com ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this E-mail message from your computer. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Thomas Schulz/DE/ConSors ist außer Haus.
Ich werde ab 01.04.2010 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 11.04.2010. Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Can I find out when a policy first ran?
You can also use bpimagelist to show you the oldest active backup in the catalogue. Although it doesn't give you the date for when the policy was first created, it will tell you how far back you can possibly go with that policy. bpimagelist -d 01/01/1970 -policy policy_name -U Brian J. Greenberg General System Dynamics LLC br...@gsysd.com http://gsysd.com 312.242.1840 Follow me on Twitter Follow GSD on Twitter On Apr 1, 2010, at 9:03 AM, judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com wrote: Maybe. /opt/openv/netbackup/db/class This is where the policies live. You can look here and if you can see the difference between creation and modification you might be able to tell. Me I make a point of when creating a new policy I put a date in that active field so I know when I started using it. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of BeDour, Wayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 8:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Can I find out when a policy first ran? We are running, NBU 6.5.4 on HP-UX 11-31. Is there a way to find out when a policy first started running? Wayne BeDour Unix System Administrator PH: 248-447-1739 Internet: wbed...@lear.com ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Why SAN speed is too much slow
Are you seeing 55MB/sec to the switch but only 10MB/sec to the tape drive at the same time? If so, are you sure there is no other traffic on that HBA? Or is the backup spiking to 50MB/sec when it first starts and then slowing down to 10MB/sec? This is normal behavior from my perspective as buffers and command queues fill on the hardware. Have you tried running the same backup via gigabit Ethernet for test purposes? If you get the same speed over Ethernet then your SAN is probably fine. If you have the free space, create several large (50 x ~1GB ea) files and back them up. If the large files backup faster, then this issue is most likely not your SAN configuration, but your file system layout. 10MB/sec off a Windows file server with hundreds of thousands of small files is not bad from my perspective. I normally multi-stream multiple luns to get that closer to 25MB/sec. The only faster way I've found is with Flashbackup. ** Notice for Ed Wilt's management: Last time I checked, Flashbackup wasn't officially supported on Windows clusters. However, several posters here have Flashbackup working with Windows clusters. I have never tested this personally. You might also try disabling compression on the NTFS volume and formatting the volume with a larger cluster size (the bigger the better, however anything but 4KB disables compression.) Good luck! -Jonathan From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:48 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Why SAN speed is too much slow The fact that you are getting 50 MB/s to the switch tells me that something down stream. Your server configuration is probably fine. Here are some things you can check: 1. The speed and type of the port the tape library is connected to. A speed of 10 MB/s can be caused by port mismatch for zoning. This probably will not be the problem. 2. The speed of the fibre connection to the tape drive or library. This is similar to the switch. You might be having the fibre bridge on your library hard coded to 1 gig while the switch is 2 gig. There may also be a configuration on the bridge that sets the speed to the tape drive. It could be set to a low speed. Jeff On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:49 PM, qiblatain netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote: My Netbackup server is connected to the File server via LAN. My same Netbackup server is connected to the SAN Switch via Fiber. The File server is also connected to the SAN Switch via Fiber. SAN Switch is connected to one Robot Library having shared tape drive. I have done the necessary zonning required on the SAN Switch to take the traffice on the SAN. I am able to take the backup of the File Server through SAN using Media Server. I have done all the necessary tunning buffering in order to increase the speed, it has increased the speed but not adequate. The speed for my backups is 10 MB/S. I have checked even the performance graph on the SAN Switch. At port number 3 SAN Switch is receiving nearly 55 MB/S but suddenly it's speed lowers down at nearly 10 MB/S and start transmitting at the same speed to tape library. At other end the end from the port 5 of the SAN Switch to the Tape Libraray the speed again becomes fast. Is it possibe that the SAN Switch is not properly configured. Because I have done everything in order to increase the speed from the Netbackup end. I even have checked the console of the tape library but to no avail. Can any body guide me what are the necessary actions i can take in order to get the desired result for the SAN. I am using Windows Netbackup server 6.5.3. This Netbackup server is installed on the 2003 R2. I have made the File Server (FS02), as the second (additional) media server for SAN having version 6.5.2. The File Server (FS02) has Windows 2008. This File Server (FS02) is clustered with another File Server having name FS03. The problem for the low speed is possible due to some cluster issue? Waiting for Quick responses. +-- |This was sent by qiblat...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
Hello, Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a LTO3 tape but the tape is definitely a LTO4 tape. I have read the Technote on this but that is all I have found. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/321244.htm Thanks Dwayne Adams Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:41:25 AM - started process bpbrm (1216) 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:00 4/1/2010 8:41:37 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 8:42:23 AM - Error bptm(pid=3972) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - Warning bptm(pid=3972) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 8:42:54 AM - end writing termination requested by administrator(150) Netbackup 6.5.4 Library 1 Media Server Dell ML6000 series 2 LTO4 drives and 4 LTO3 drives (Downed for testing encryption with LTO4 tapes) manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00010049, fl2 0x0004 Library 2 Master\Media Dell ML6000 series 6 LTO4 drives manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00030849, fl2 0x ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:16 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Hello, Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a LTO3 tape but the tape is definitely a LTO4 tape. I have read the Technote on this but that is all I have found. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/321244.htm Thanks Dwayne Adams Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:41:25 AM - started process bpbrm (1216) 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:00 4/1/2010 8:41:37 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 8:42:23 AM - Error bptm(pid=3972) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - Warning bptm(pid=3972) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 8:42:54 AM - end writing termination requested by administrator(150) Netbackup 6.5.4 Library 1 Media Server Dell ML6000 series 2 LTO4 drives and 4 LTO3 drives (Downed for testing encryption with LTO4 tapes) manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00010049, fl2 0x0004 Library 2 Master\Media Dell ML6000 series 6 LTO4 drives manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00030849, fl2 0x ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
Judy, I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the drive? I called Dell and they were not much help. Once I said the KMS, I got the we only support our solution line. I am getting my ducks in a row so I can call Dell back if it is not a NBU config issue. My libraries are both setup for application managed encryption. Wish me luck. :-) Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:22 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:16 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Hello, Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a LTO3 tape but the tape is definitely a LTO4 tape. I have read the Technote on this but that is all I have found. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/321244.htm Thanks Dwayne Adams Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:41:25 AM - started process bpbrm (1216) 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:00 4/1/2010 8:41:37 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 8:42:23 AM - Error bptm(pid=3972) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - Warning bptm(pid=3972) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 8:42:54 AM - end writing termination requested by administrator(150) Netbackup 6.5.4 Library 1 Media Server Dell ML6000 series 2 LTO4 drives and 4 LTO3 drives (Downed for testing encryption with LTO4 tapes) manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00010049, fl2 0x0004 Library 2 Master\Media Dell ML6000 series 6 LTO4 drives manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00030849, fl2 0x ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
A side note. Not sure if this make a difference. There is a firewall between my master\media and media server. All the standard ports have been configured and all backups and restores work fine today. Dwayne From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:33 AM To: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Judy, I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the drive? I called Dell and they were not much help. Once I said the KMS, I got the we only support our solution line. I am getting my ducks in a row so I can call Dell back if it is not a NBU config issue. My libraries are both setup for application managed encryption. Wish me luck. :-) Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:22 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:16 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Hello, Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a LTO3 tape but the tape is definitely a LTO4 tape. I have read the Technote on this but that is all I have found. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/321244.htm Thanks Dwayne Adams Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:41:25 AM - started process bpbrm (1216) 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:00 4/1/2010 8:41:37 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 8:42:23 AM - Error bptm(pid=3972) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - Warning bptm(pid=3972) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 8:42:54 AM - end writing termination requested by administrator(150) Netbackup 6.5.4 Library 1 Media Server Dell ML6000 series 2 LTO4 drives and 4 LTO3 drives (Downed for testing encryption with LTO4 tapes) manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00010049, fl2 0x0004 Library 2 Master\Media Dell ML6000 series 6 LTO4 drives manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00030849, fl2 0x ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
I seem to remember reading in the book the type HAD to be HCART=lto4 (not sure if I read that somewhere or it just stuck in my head) Try deleting one of your tapes, and get it added back in as an HCART - your lto4 tape drives should already be HCART ( if not you will have to change them as well) Then give it a try - I really think that is the problem. From: Adams, Dwayne [mailto:adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:33 AM To: Judy Hinchcliffe; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Judy, I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the drive? I called Dell and they were not much help. Once I said the KMS, I got the we only support our solution line. I am getting my ducks in a row so I can call Dell back if it is not a NBU config issue. My libraries are both setup for application managed encryption. Wish me luck. J Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:22 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:16 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Hello, Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a LTO3 tape but the tape is definitely a LTO4 tape. I have read the Technote on this but that is all I have found. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/321244.htm Thanks Dwayne Adams Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:41:25 AM - started process bpbrm (1216) 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:00 4/1/2010 8:41:37 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 8:42:23 AM - Error bptm(pid=3972) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - Warning bptm(pid=3972) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 8:42:54 AM - end writing termination requested by administrator(150) Netbackup 6.5.4 Library 1 Media Server Dell ML6000 series 2 LTO4 drives and 4 LTO3 drives (Downed for testing encryption with LTO4 tapes) manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00010049, fl2 0x0004 Library 2 Master\Media Dell ML6000 series 6 LTO4 drives manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00030849, fl2 0x ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
Judy, I will let you know what I find out. Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:55 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I seem to remember reading in the book the type HAD to be HCART=lto4 (not sure if I read that somewhere or it just stuck in my head) Try deleting one of your tapes, and get it added back in as an HCART - your lto4 tape drives should already be HCART ( if not you will have to change them as well) Then give it a try - I really think that is the problem. From: Adams, Dwayne [mailto:adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:33 AM To: Judy Hinchcliffe; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Judy, I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the drive? I called Dell and they were not much help. Once I said the KMS, I got the we only support our solution line. I am getting my ducks in a row so I can call Dell back if it is not a NBU config issue. My libraries are both setup for application managed encryption. Wish me luck. :-) Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:22 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:16 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Hello, Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a LTO3 tape but the tape is definitely a LTO4 tape. I have read the Technote on this but that is all I have found. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/321244.htm Thanks Dwayne Adams Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:41:25 AM - started process bpbrm (1216) 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:00 4/1/2010 8:41:37 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 8:42:23 AM - Error bptm(pid=3972) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - Warning bptm(pid=3972) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 8:42:54 AM - end writing termination requested by administrator(150) Netbackup 6.5.4 Library 1 Media Server Dell ML6000 series 2 LTO4 drives and 4 LTO3 drives (Downed for testing encryption with LTO4 tapes) manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00010049, fl2 0x0004 Library 2 Master\Media Dell ML6000 series 6 LTO4 drives manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00030849, fl2 0x ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
I can confirm that this is not the case. I think your problem is that both of your media types (LTO3 and LTO4) are set to HCART3... you need to have that separated out, and you need to have your drives configured the same. If your LTO3 media is HCART3 and your LTO4 media are HCART, then you need your LTO3 drives to be HCART3 and your LTO4 drives to be HCART. Is your 001343 media an LTO4 cartridge? And was it mounted into an LTO4 drive when you tried to write the encrypted backup? Scott Chapman Senior Technical Specialist Storage and Database Administration ICBC - Victoria Ph: 250.414.7650 Cell: 250.213.9295 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:55 AM To: adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I seem to remember reading in the book the type HAD to be HCART=lto4 (not sure if I read that somewhere or it just stuck in my head) Try deleting one of your tapes, and get it added back in as an HCART - your lto4 tape drives should already be HCART ( if not you will have to change them as well) Then give it a try - I really think that is the problem. From: Adams, Dwayne [mailto:adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:33 AM To: Judy Hinchcliffe; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Judy, I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the drive? I called Dell and they were not much help. Once I said the KMS, I got the we only support our solution line. I am getting my ducks in a row so I can call Dell back if it is not a NBU config issue. My libraries are both setup for application managed encryption. Wish me luck. J Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:22 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:16 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Hello, Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a LTO3 tape but the tape is definitely a LTO4 tape. I have read the Technote on this but that is all I have found. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/321244.htm Thanks Dwayne Adams Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:41:25 AM - started process bpbrm (1216) 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 8:41:36 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:00 4/1/2010 8:41:37 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 8:42:23 AM - Error bptm(pid=3972) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - Warning bptm(pid=3972) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 8:42:24 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 8:42:54 AM - end writing termination requested by administrator(150) Netbackup 6.5.4 Library 1 Media Server Dell ML6000 series 2 LTO4 drives and 4 LTO3 drives (Downed for testing encryption with LTO4 tapes) manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00010049, fl2 0x0004 Library 2 Master\Media Dell ML6000 series 6 LTO4 drives manage_drive_attributes: report_attr, fl1 0x00030849, fl2 0x This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email immediately. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
I set it up in a small test environment, and started backing up three clients into a deduplication pool exclusively. 2 windows and 1 linux system The first pass wasn't that impressive, maybe a 5% to 10% de-dup ratio and it took a bit longer than just streaming that same data to tape or disk. The second pass had a 90% deduplication ratio, mostly because just 1 week had passed since the first full backup and not every file changed. After three weeks, I had about 300GB of data deduplicated down into about 90GB of disk space. The kbytes total reported from the catalog said 300G, and df -k said 90G. The data content of the three systems is typical for a user workstation. Email, photos, miscellaneous files. De-dup let me put many versions of those same files into a backup without actually having many copies of that file spinning on disk. And then the disk holding the de-duplicated data developed a bunch of bad sectors and I lost it all. Once I rebuild it, I'll check out the DR process for protecting your de-dup database and files. I also want to test client side de-duplication to see if that helps stream data compared to media server de-duplication alone. The media/master server is a quad core with 8g ram, and the clients are a desktop and a laptop. After seeing it run and observing the space savings it generates, I think it is a very creative way to solve some (not all) problems. It is definitely not a set it and forget it technology. You still need to monitor its utilization similar to how you would monitor basic disk or tape usage. -Jon From: Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Thu, April 1, 2010 3:27:36 AM Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe? Hi, Is anyone using de-dupe? What kind of savings are you seeing? Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
Scott, 1343 is a LTO4 tape. I just made the change and tested. I set one of my LTO4 drives to HCART, created a new HCART Storage Unit, changed the policy to use that storage unit, deleted the tapes and ran an inventory as HCART to the Scratch Pool. Same outcome. 4/1/2010 10:11:01 AM - estimated 0 kbytes needed 4/1/2010 10:11:05 AM - started process bpbrm (3608) 4/1/2010 10:11:17 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 10:11:18 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:01 4/1/2010 10:11:19 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 10:11:54 AM - Error bptm(pid=4024) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 10:11:55 AM - Warning bptm(pid=4024) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 10:11:55 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource 001342 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource IBM.ULTRIUM-TD4.001 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource som012-hcart-robot-tld-1 4/1/2010 10:12:34 AM - mounting 001342 4/1/2010 10:13:17 AM - Error bptm(pid=4024) FREEZING media id 001342, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 10:13:18 AM - Warning bptm(pid=4024) media id 001342 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 10:13:18 AM - current media 001342 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 10:13:58 AM - end writing unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) termination requested by administrator(150) Dwayne From: Chapman, Scott [mailto:scott.chap...@icbc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:06 AM To: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I can confirm that this is not the case. I think your problem is that both of your media types (LTO3 and LTO4) are set to HCART3... you need to have that separated out, and you need to have your drives configured the same. If your LTO3 media is HCART3 and your LTO4 media are HCART, then you need your LTO3 drives to be HCART3 and your LTO4 drives to be HCART. Is your 001343 media an LTO4 cartridge? And was it mounted into an LTO4 drive when you tried to write the encrypted backup? Scott Chapman Senior Technical Specialist Storage and Database Administration ICBC - Victoria Ph: 250.414.7650 Cell: 250.213.9295 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:55 AM To: adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I seem to remember reading in the book the type HAD to be HCART=lto4 (not sure if I read that somewhere or it just stuck in my head) Try deleting one of your tapes, and get it added back in as an HCART - your lto4 tape drives should already be HCART ( if not you will have to change them as well) Then give it a try - I really think that is the problem. From: Adams, Dwayne [mailto:adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:33 AM To: Judy Hinchcliffe; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Judy, I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the drive? I called Dell and they were not much help. Once I said the KMS, I got the we only support our solution line. I am getting my ducks in a row so I can call Dell back if it is not a NBU config issue. My libraries are both setup for application managed encryption. Wish me luck. :-) Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:22 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:16 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Hello, Has anyone run into this issue with KMS? I have setup KMS on my Master Server and can encrypt data to the pools from my Master. I get the following error and the tape is frozen when I try to run an encrypted job from my Media Server. The bptm log says the tape is a
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
Dwayne, Can you show the errors in the bptm log with verbose set to 5? Also do you have any system errors showing scsi errors for the problem? len From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 1:25 PM To: Chapman, Scott; judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Scott, 1343 is a LTO4 tape. I just made the change and tested. I set one of my LTO4 drives to HCART, created a new HCART Storage Unit, changed the policy to use that storage unit, deleted the tapes and ran an inventory as HCART to the Scratch Pool. Same outcome. 4/1/2010 10:11:01 AM - estimated 0 kbytes needed 4/1/2010 10:11:05 AM - started process bpbrm (3608) 4/1/2010 10:11:17 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 10:11:18 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:01 4/1/2010 10:11:19 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 10:11:54 AM - Error bptm(pid=4024) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 10:11:55 AM - Warning bptm(pid=4024) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 10:11:55 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource 001342 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource IBM.ULTRIUM-TD4.001 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource som012-hcart-robot-tld-1 4/1/2010 10:12:34 AM - mounting 001342 4/1/2010 10:13:17 AM - Error bptm(pid=4024) FREEZING media id 001342, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 10:13:18 AM - Warning bptm(pid=4024) media id 001342 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 10:13:18 AM - current media 001342 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 10:13:58 AM - end writing unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) termination requested by administrator(150) Dwayne From: Chapman, Scott [mailto:scott.chap...@icbc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:06 AM To: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I can confirm that this is not the case. I think your problem is that both of your media types (LTO3 and LTO4) are set to HCART3... you need to have that separated out, and you need to have your drives configured the same. If your LTO3 media is HCART3 and your LTO4 media are HCART, then you need your LTO3 drives to be HCART3 and your LTO4 drives to be HCART. Is your 001343 media an LTO4 cartridge? And was it mounted into an LTO4 drive when you tried to write the encrypted backup? Scott Chapman Senior Technical Specialist Storage and Database Administration ICBC - Victoria Ph: 250.414.7650 Cell: 250.213.9295 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:55 AM To: adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I seem to remember reading in the book the type HAD to be HCART=lto4 (not sure if I read that somewhere or it just stuck in my head) Try deleting one of your tapes, and get it added back in as an HCART - your lto4 tape drives should already be HCART ( if not you will have to change them as well) Then give it a try - I really think that is the problem. From: Adams, Dwayne [mailto:adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:33 AM To: Judy Hinchcliffe; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Judy, I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the drive? I called Dell and they were not much help. Once I said the KMS, I got the we only support our solution line. I am getting my ducks in a row so I can call Dell back if it is not a NBU config issue. My libraries are both setup for application managed encryption. Wish me luck. :) Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:22 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010
[Veritas-bu] 2 media servers under the same master?
Our environment, NBU 6.5.4 Master and separate media server running on HP-UX 11-31 with a Data Domain VTL and MSL6060 tape library. Can I add another media server and use the data domain vtl along with the other media server? Do I have to use SSO to share the vtl or will the master take care of the sharing? Thanks in advance for any advice. Wayne BeDour Unix System Administrator PH: 248-447-1739 Internet: wbed...@lear.com ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this E-mail message from your computer. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 2 media servers under the same master?
Wayne, I'm assuming you are using the DD as VTL, not using OST. If so, yes, using SSO you can share the VTL drives with the other media server. I believe you have to have the SSO license on all media servers that share the drives. It used to be sold on a per drive basis, not sure how they sell it anymore. -- See your sales rep for details. :) Bryan BeDour, Wayne wbed...@lear.com Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 04/01/2010 12:46 PM To veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] 2 media servers under the same master? Our environment, NBU 6.5.4 Master and separate media server running on HP-UX 11-31 with a Data Domain VTL and MSL6060 tape library. Can I add another media server and use the data domain vtl along with the other media server? Do I have to use SSO to share the vtl or will the master take care of the sharing? Thanks in advance for any advice. Wayne BeDour Unix System Administrator PH: 248-447-1739 Internet: wbed...@lear.com ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this E-mail message from your computer. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu BR_ FONT size=2BR DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email./FONT___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption
Dwayne, This happens when RObot Device host is not the true EMM server. you can determine the true EMM server by executing nbemmcmd -listhosts (the top host will be the true EMM server). Thank you Surjit Sedeora Sr. Systems Engineer NGIT Adams, Dwayne wrote: Scott, 1343 is a LTO4 tape. I just made the change and tested. I set one of my LTO4 drives to HCART, created a new HCART Storage Unit, changed the policy to use that storage unit, deleted the tapes and ran an inventory as HCART to the Scratch Pool. Same outcome. 4/1/2010 10:11:01 AM - estimated 0 kbytes needed 4/1/2010 10:11:05 AM - started process bpbrm (3608) 4/1/2010 10:11:17 AM - connecting 4/1/2010 10:11:18 AM - connected; connect time: 00:00:01 4/1/2010 10:11:19 AM - mounting 001343 4/1/2010 10:11:54 AM - Error bptm(pid=4024) FREEZING media id 001343, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 10:11:55 AM - Warning bptm(pid=4024) media id 001343 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 10:11:55 AM - current media 001343 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource 001342 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource IBM.ULTRIUM-TD4.001 4/1/2010 10:12:32 AM - granted resource som012-hcart-robot-tld-1 4/1/2010 10:12:34 AM - mounting 001342 4/1/2010 10:13:17 AM - Error bptm(pid=4024) FREEZING media id 001342, Encryption unavailable for an ENCR pool 4/1/2010 10:13:18 AM - Warning bptm(pid=4024) media id 001342 load operation reported an error 4/1/2010 10:13:18 AM - current media 001342 complete, requesting next resource Any 4/1/2010 10:13:58 AM - end writing unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) termination requested by administrator(150) Dwayne From: Chapman, Scott [mailto:scott.chap...@icbc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:06 AM To: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I can confirm that this is not the case. I think your problem is that both of your media types (LTO3 and LTO4) are set to HCART3 you need to have that separated out, and you need to have your drives configured the same. If your LTO3 media is HCART3 and your LTO4 media are HCART, then you need your LTO3 drives to be HCART3 and your LTO4 drives to be HCART. Is your 001343 media an LTO4 cartridge? And was it mounted into an LTO4 drive when you tried to write the encrypted backup? Scott Chapman Senior Technical Specialist Storage and Database Administration ICBC - Victoria Ph: 250.414.7650 Cell: 250.213.9295 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:55 AM To: adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I seem to remember reading in the book the type HAD to be HCART=lto4 (not sure if I read that somewhere or it just stuck in my head) Try deleting one of your tapes, and get it added back in as an HCART your lto4 tape drives should already be HCART ( if not you will have to change them as well) Then give it a try I really think that is the problem. From: Adams, Dwayne [mailto:adam...@medsch.ucsf.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:33 AM To: Judy Hinchcliffe; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption Judy, I have a call in to Symantec now. My environment already has LTO3 and LTO4 media set to HCART3 (not my doing). I am going to change the tapes to HCART as part of this project. I wonder if the fl1 0x00010049 is reported by the drive or Netbackup is providing that information to the drive? I called Dell and they were not much help. Once I said the KMS, I got the we only support our solution line. I am getting my ducks in a row so I can call Dell back if it is not a NBU config issue. My libraries are both setup for application managed encryption. Wish me luck. J Thanks Dwayne Adams From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:22 AM To: Adams, Dwayne; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] KMS encryption I have not had that problem. My thought is what media type is 001343 - it has to be hcart (so nb knows it is a lto4) As you have both types in your library I would check that the media type/barcode say it is a lto4 as well has physically check that it is an lto4. I have a master/media, a media, and 2 SAN Media all encrypting just fine. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:16 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re:
Re: [Veritas-bu] Flashbackup restores to Windows a success but no data on Dr
With the Raw Partition restore for flashbackup-windows we have seen you need to set the restore option to overwrite. I haven't used the Standard flashbackup policy On 3/31/2010 6:16 PM, khester wrote: We have been trying to restore about 1.5 TB of data to our File Server which is a newly built staging server. We're restoring it from the original File Server which was backed up using Flash Backup (raw). Most of the restores have worked, however, it fails when we select individual folders are failing with an status 5 so we decided to move to full volume restores but when we restore it completes successfully but when we login to the source server, there's no data on the drive. +-- |This was sent by kenisha.hes...@usmint.treas.gov via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
