Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2015-07-08 Thread Robinson, Greg
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install We use the Symantec Altiris product set to deploy all sorts of software, and that includes NetBackup clients. There are many such products, which support a range of OS types so that you can do what you require.We do have to create our

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install

2015-07-08 Thread Scott Jacobson
as-bu2 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install I doubt we can push windows binaries from the master server itself. We can only push unix binaries from the master server. From: "Lightner, Jeff" Sent: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:51:49 To: Anurag Sharma , veritas-bu ,

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install

2015-07-08 Thread William Brown
Sent: 05 July 2015 17:10 To: Lightner,Jeff Cc: veritas-bu; veritas-bu2 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install I doubt we can push windows binaries from the master server itself. We can only push unix binaries from the master server. From: "Lightner, Jeff" Sen

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install

2015-07-05 Thread nbuser
eritas-bu <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>, veritas-bu2 <veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install No.   The master should be able to push to any clients it supports.   We have a mix of Linux, Windows and HP-UX.  Previously we u

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install

2015-07-02 Thread Lightner, Jeff
the push some time ago in favor of doing ssh install to Linux and Unix. From: Anurag Sharma [mailto:sharma.anu...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 2:21 AM To: Lightner, Jeff; veritas-bu; veritas-bu2 Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install Jeff, If my master and

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install

2015-07-01 Thread Anurag Sharma
1 Jul 2015 14:19:37 + Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install You can create the policy in NetBackup and use that screen to push to the clients you’re installing.That assumes you’ve opened up connection to the clients. You’d want separate policies for AIX,

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install

2015-07-01 Thread Lightner, Jeff
ilman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Anurag Sharma Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 5:17 AM To: veritas-bu; veritas-bu2 Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install Hello All, Let say we have our master server on solaris 10 (sprac architectu

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install

2015-07-01 Thread Anurag Sharma
Hello All, Let say we have our master server on solaris 10 (sprac architecture) and Media servers on Redhat and AIX and windows. Now we need to install NetBackup clients on 5000 server with mixed OS linux, windows etc. What is the best way to install clients ? I know we can push through SCCM

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support - RESOLVED

2015-06-16 Thread Lightner, Jeff
as-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support My apologies to Neil Conner. I realize on looking at this again today that he was trying to point out the compatibility matrix still shows use of the RHEL 2.6 client package for RH

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support

2015-05-12 Thread Lightner, Jeff
one. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Lightner, Jeff Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 2:11 PM To: Neil Conner Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 nati

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support

2015-04-23 Thread Lightner, Jeff
ent?". My question is "Where is the client to use for RHEL7's 3.x kernel?" From: Neil Conner [mailto:n...@mbari.org] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:15 PM To: Lightner, Jeff Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kern

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support

2015-04-23 Thread Neil Conner
In the OS compatibility list, look for the section “Client Selections for Backup Policies” and you’ll see the following: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 x86-64 Linux,RedHat2.6.18 Neil On Apr 23, 2015, at 8:29 AM, Lightner, Jeff wrote: > How do we get this. So far as we can tell

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support

2015-04-23 Thread Lightner, Jeff
How do we get this. So far as we can tell despite documentation to the contrary as detailed below we are still only seeing Linux Kernel 2.6 support in our 7.6 installation. We had found technote some time ago while still running NetBackup 7.1: https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH184

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape

2015-01-29 Thread Dan Pritts
2nd thing consider not duplicating from tape. They can only do one thing at a time and can end up searching for data sequentially. Consider basic disk and staging, or synthetic backup, or deduplication in combination with data life cycle policies. BasicDisk is free, and can make use of ch

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Oracle Intelegent Agent

2015-01-29 Thread Lightner, Jeff
om: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of gregsih Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:28 AM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Oracle Intelegent Agent We have NetBackup 7.6.0.4 running on R

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape

2015-01-29 Thread Lightner, Jeff
them). -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Bluejay Adametz Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 7:38 AM To: Veritas List Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape

2015-01-29 Thread Bluejay Adametz
> -- How do I check for the -mpx on my bpduplicate? The entire job is run > through a GUI interface so I have never seen that option. I've only done duplications via the command line (we script our duplications), However, looking around in the Java GUI, when you get to the "Setup Duplication Vari

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape

2015-01-29 Thread tanders1
-- How do I check for the -mpx on my bpduplicate? The entire job is run through a GUI interface so I have never seen that option. I first backup to tape and that is multiplexing so lots of jobs run at the same time. Then, I start duplication from the current tapes to new tapes. For some of the

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape

2015-01-29 Thread Bluejay Adametz
> I first backup to tape and that is multiplexing so lots of jobs run at the > same time. Then, I start duplication from the current tapes to new tapes. For > some of the server images, it goes pretty quickly and I can actually watch > the file size go up as it duplicates. Are you specifying -m

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Oracle Intelegent Agent

2015-01-29 Thread gregsih
We have NetBackup 7.6.0.4 running on Red Hat Linux 6.6 as our master server with a requirement to backup a number of Oracle 12c Databases (also running on RHEL 6.6) using the new Symantec OIA product. The databases are all RAC clusters, which the agent cannot cope with, so we are backing each da

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape

2015-01-28 Thread avro 42
First make sure your data buffers are set. This can improve performance InstallPath\Veritas\NetBackup\db\config (touch files are plain text files no extensions) NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS_RESTORE This can be a trial and error kind of thing but we use LOT3-5 and we have the data buf

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape

2015-01-28 Thread tanders1
Hello, I have been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks on this issue. I first backup to tape and that is multiplexing so lots of jobs run at the same time. Then, I start duplication from the current tapes to new tapes. For some of the server images, it goes pretty quickly and I can actual

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel

2014-11-24 Thread Dan Pritts
VD (or share) is called browser.exe. *From:*veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk *Sent:* Monday, November 24, 2014 4:55 AM *To:* VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU *Subject:* Re: [Verita

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel

2014-11-24 Thread tsimerson
With NBU 7.1, the Java console and native Windows console are pretty much the same. Prior to that, there was a huge difference in functionality. The only real difference between the two is that when you are accessing client properties through the native Windows console, you can actually browse

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel

2014-11-24 Thread Lightner, Jeff
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:55 AM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel Hi, Please forgive my confusion, but what does

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel

2014-11-24 Thread netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk
Hi, Please forgive my confusion, but what does putty and the windows admin console have to do with each other. You can use putty to login to the master then use the jnbSA to initiate an X display. Otherwise you use the windows admin console an specify the master server name. The server you are ru

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel

2014-11-24 Thread richarn
Jeff . Thanks for your reply. The Netbackup Administration Console I am trying to get to work is the one this you can install on a windows machine. It is run from the start menu in windows. I am o.k with the jnbSA , X window method and use this regularly using putty X forwarding. I believe

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain

2014-11-21 Thread Scott Jacobson
Just for clarification. My e-mail post was with regards to the 5230 model and not the 5220 though I did my POC with a 5220. The 5230 is leaps and bounds a complete and different generation than the 5220 - really no comparison in my books. My three 5230's are doing exactly what I need of them and

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel

2014-11-20 Thread Stier, Matthew
EDU Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel When you say "NetBackup Administration Console" exactly what command are you running? The jnbSA can actually be started from UNIX/Linux but since it is Java is sending an X window to you. If the consol

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel

2014-11-20 Thread Lightner, Jeff
sage- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of richarn Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:09 AM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel I am trying to u

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel

2014-11-20 Thread richarn
I am trying to use the Netbackup Administration Console as I believe it has certain advantages over the jnbSA jave interface. There are fire walls between my Windows machine where I want to run Administration Console and the redhat server which is the netbackup master server. To this end I hav

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain

2014-11-17 Thread Christopher Costa
The 5220 appliance RAID card was powered by a battery and the battery went bad on them sometimes. Since the 5230 the RAID card is capacity and we have had zero problems since then. The 5230 with the 2.6.0.2 code can scale up to 148TB now, the 5330 will scale up to 450TB by summer. On Monday, Novem

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain

2014-11-17 Thread saiyed123
I appreciate all the posts and opinions, i welcome some more as the information is valuable in making the decision, i am bit concerned about performance and reliability ( as mentioned by Scott) so hopefully more Appliance users can validate this issue. I do feel Scott's issue may be 5220 applian

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain

2014-11-17 Thread scott . george
s. We were burnt by not doing enough of that ahead of time. In this space, performance and functionality go hand-in-hand at times. From: "Scott Jacobson" To: "Mikhail Nikitin" , Date: 11/16/2014 01:48 PM Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance V

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain

2014-11-16 Thread Scott Jacobson
You'll likely receive many responses to your inquire so I add mine as well. In my research with DD and Quantum is that they were all compatible pieces to create the solution your seeking, however, there are many moving parts in getting them to work and some features are missing (as mentioned, ie

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain

2014-11-15 Thread Mikhail Nikitin
Couple of things to consider. NBU Appliance is a media server plus a dedupe pool so it can do offhost VMware backups over SAN whereas OST Appliances need a media server. Some additional features like VMware instant recovery are not yet available for OST partners. You can attach Data Domain to the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain

2014-11-14 Thread Lightner, Jeff
ilto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of saiyed123 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 10:11 AM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain Our company is considering NBU for backup solution using backup appliance, our environment

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain

2014-11-14 Thread saiyed123
Our company is considering NBU for backup solution using backup appliance, our environment is mainly VMWARE ( 800+ guest) 30 + ESX and 30+Solaris boxes. We also need Exchange backups to improve and keep the backup over the san when possible. We will need data replicated offsite also. Current prop

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences.

2014-09-11 Thread Michael Graff Andersen
tafiles > in Oracle. If the backup was a “dump” from Oracle to flat files that were > then backed up to tape the dump can probably be imported by Oracle on Linux. > > > > > > > > *From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [ > mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences.

2014-09-10 Thread Lightner, Jeff
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu<mailto:veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences. I think I am going to have a lot of trouble importing this tape. Not only am I on 7.1 but my master server is Windows and theirs was Solaris Anyone have a possible

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences.

2014-09-09 Thread Lightner, Jeff
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences. I think I am going to have a lot of trouble importing this tape. Not only am I on 7.1 but my master server is Windows and theirs was Solaris Anyone have a possible way for me to read this tape without installing Solaris and creating a new

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences.

2014-09-09 Thread Preston, Douglas
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Preston, Douglas Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:12 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences. Does 7.5 write to tape differently than 7.1? Trying to import a tape

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences.

2014-09-09 Thread Preston, Douglas
Does 7.5 write to tape differently than 7.1? Trying to import a tape written in 7.5 to our master server using 7.1 bpimport -id ATL323 Import phase 2 started 9/9/2014 8:24:46 AM INF - Importing policy Lereta_SPL_1, schedule Full (atl-sunprod_1410102290), med ia id ATL323, created on 09/07/2014 0

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup change policy attribute question

2014-07-18 Thread Lightner, Jeff
: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup change policy attribute question There is no contradiction between your understanding and bpexpdate -recalculate. The original question was about policy settings (not retention levels) and change in the policy will not be propagated. The change in retention levels will be

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup change policy attribute question

2014-07-18 Thread Mikhail Nikitin
Message- > From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: > veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Mikhail Nikitin > Sent: July-17-14 10:30 PM > To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup change policy attribute question

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup change policy attribute question

2014-07-17 Thread Mikhail Nikitin
Hi, No, NetBackup does not propagate changes in retention retrospectively. If you need to change retention of existing images, you need to run bpexpdate with the -recalculate switch for the images in question. On 3 Jul 2014, at 3:56 am, settler wrote: > If I change the retention attributes on

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup change policy attribute question

2014-07-17 Thread settler
If I change the retention attributes on an existing policy, do the retention attributes apply to that which was backed up prior to making the change? e.g. if I change retention attributes from 1 year, to 45 days, will data older than 45 days that has been backed up prior to making the policy c

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 certification

2014-04-26 Thread smpt1
, April 26, 2014 7:37 PM To: veritas-bu; veritas-bu2 Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 certification Anyone done it ? Any gotcha ? I haven't worked on nbu appliance and PDDO any questions on those ? ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Verit

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 certification

2014-04-26 Thread Anurag Sharma
Anyone done it ? Any gotcha ? I haven't worked on nbu appliance and PDDO any questions on those ? ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/verit

[Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.1 convert catalog to 7.5

2014-02-12 Thread Venkatraghavan Marisamy
-- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:32 + From: "Iverson, Jerald" Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.1 convert catalog to 7.5 To: "veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" Message-ID: <821dc9c5c44a7a4ebb4e64c1ebbdeaa302160...@ushouxmb11

Re: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.1 convert catalog to 7.5

2014-02-07 Thread smpt1
4 6:02 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.1 convert catalog to 7.5 environment: redhat linux 7.5 master/media server we move ("archive") old catalog images which don't expire under netbackup/db/images for 1 client to a nfs mounted fil

[Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.1 convert catalog to 7.5

2014-02-07 Thread Iverson, Jerald
environment: redhat linux 7.5 master/media server we move ("archive") old catalog images which don't expire under netbackup/db/images for 1 client to a nfs mounted filesystem to keep the image database to a managable size, and then link an epoch directory to the nfs mount if needed for a restor

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

2014-02-02 Thread Mikhail Nikitin
it. > > Suni : Let us know what did you do finally. DDBOOST over IP or FC or VTL over > FC ? > > MikhailI hate to say but do you have these documentations pdfs handy if you > can email me acrooss ? > > Anurag > > Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:54:19 +1100 > Subject:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

2014-02-02 Thread Anurag Sharma
: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain, From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com To: sharma.anu...@hotmail.com CC: sunilgulati1...@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Hi Anurag, DD Boost over FC utilizes additional DFC storage server responsible for FC transfer, on top those you have for

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

2014-02-01 Thread Mikhail Nikitin
till have to be through IP > right ? So I guess you will establish initial connection using mangement IP > then transfer data using FC ??? > > > > Anurag > > -- > Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:18:46 +1100 > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

2014-02-01 Thread Anurag Sharma
mangement IP then transfer data using FC ??? Anurag Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:18:46 +1100 Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain, From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com To: sharma.anu...@hotmail.com CC: sunilgulati1...@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Anurag, This is not

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

2014-02-01 Thread Mikhail Nikitin
gmail.com > CC: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain, > > Hi Sunil, > > I believe you can use DD Boost over FC between media server and DD. With > NetWorker you can use ClientDirect with FC, too if memory serves me well. >

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

2014-01-31 Thread Anurag Sharma
device as VTL and DDBOOST at the same time. Anurag Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:58:33 +1100 From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com To: sunilgulati1...@gmail.com CC: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain, Hi Sunil, I believe you can use DD Boost over FC

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

2014-01-27 Thread Mikhail Nikitin
Hi Sunil, I believe you can use DD Boost over FC between media server and DD. With NetWorker you can use ClientDirect with FC, too if memory serves me well. However, DDs can't replicate over FC atm, you have to use 1 or 10 gig links to replicate data. Of course you need DD OS 5.4+, DD Boost plug-

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain

2014-01-27 Thread Sunil Gulati
Hello, Can we use DDboost feature over FC ? Like I have production and a DR site in my environment. I have data domain & netbackup media servers at both location. I have kept tape library at my primary site for tape outs. I want to use SLP which will run 4 backup jobs (Backup, Replication, Impor

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup SMEs required

2013-12-11 Thread Anurag Sharma
THIS POSITION IS IN INDIA ONLY NetBackup SMEs required urgently Ericsson anybody intersted please share your resume at sharma.anu...@hotmail.com ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup NDMP Dedupe

2013-09-13 Thread Dwayne Adams
Hello, Can someone share their experience with NDMP stream Deduplication using Netbackup Accelerator? Thanks, Dwayne Adams http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/power-netbackup-deduplication-application-awareness-and-global-deduplication _

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to another Filer non-celera

2013-09-05 Thread Christopher Costa
ailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: > veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu ] On Behalf Of > William Brown > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:11 PM > To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to > another Filer non-celera > > P

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to another Filer non-celera

2013-09-05 Thread William Brown
--- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Venkatraghavan Marisamy Sent: 05 September 2013 08:44 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to another Filer non-celera Hi All, We

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to another Filer non-celera

2013-09-05 Thread Lightner, Jeff
ubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to another Filer non-celera Probably not but you can ask EMC. We had a similar issue and still have a Celerra without support, just to allow restores until the backups expire. NDMP uses the native 'dump' capability of the

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to another Filer non-celera

2013-09-05 Thread Venkatraghavan Marisamy
Hi All, We had EMC Celera NAS Filers backups taken by NetBackup NDMP Agent. However these Filers were decommissioned . I remember a limitation that if NDMP backups, backed through a particular filer can be restored only to a filer of similar make and model . It cannot be redirected to another f

[Veritas-bu] netbackup media-server -> master-server

2013-09-02 Thread shoodlum
thanks for your time I will look into this -Steve +-- |This was sent by steven_h...@sdesigns.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +

Re: [Veritas-bu] netbackup media-server -> master-server

2013-09-01 Thread Girish Jorapurkar
NB 7.5 Resilient Network feature may help in your case: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH183552 From: shoodlum To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Sent: Sunday, September 1, 2013 10:53 AM Subject: [Veritas-bu] netba

[Veritas-bu] netbackup media-server -> master-server

2013-09-01 Thread shoodlum
All- I have the following setup location 1 media server master server --- location 2 media server the locations are connected with a fast network connection but every-once-in-a-while I have a network connection problem(about 2 seconds) between the 2 sites, when this happens the running jobs

[Veritas-bu] netbackup and mtx on same server

2013-08-15 Thread Dennis Peacock
Maybe Netbackup has the robot arm and mtx can't talk to it.?? +-- |This was sent by dpe...@acxiom.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-

[Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.5.0.6 bpimmedia question

2013-07-29 Thread SteveMurphy
Jerald, you bring up a valid point. 2 of them, actually. In 7.5, the image header is no longer a standalone file, it resides in the EMM database. As to bpimmedia, this was discovered earlier on in 7.5 so it is a known issue. However, it has not come up in an actual Support case. There is a bug

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.5.0.6 - Consuming All Memory

2013-07-29 Thread SteveMurphy
I recommend opening a case with Symantec Support on this. There are no known issues with bpdbm in 7.5.0.6 that I could find. It would be beneficial if we could get a couple of bpdbm crash dumps and debug logs so that we may see what is using the memory in addition to bpdbm. Steve Murphy NetBackup

[Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.5.0.6 bpimmedia question

2013-07-24 Thread Iverson, Jerald
i've upgraded 1 of my environments to 7.5.0.6, and noticed that the db/images///__ files are no longer there. the .f files are there, and now a .lck file is there, but not the backup image header file for me to grab backup data out of. so i'm trying to get fragment information using the bpimm

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.5.0.6 - Consuming All Memory

2013-07-16 Thread bditty
I am running netbackup 7.5.0.6 and the BPDBM process is consuming all of the memory on the master backup server. We were running the .4 release, support recommended we upgrade, but that did not resolve the issue. The server is running W2K8 R2, symptoms arose about 4 weeks back, close to when t

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script

2013-05-03 Thread Ken Olstad
he clients & servers to perform well, so we don't often >hand install...but it definitely works locally for RHEL. > >William > >From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu >[veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] on beh

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script

2013-05-02 Thread William Brown
@mbari.org] Sent: 01 May 2013 23:58 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script Environment: NetBackup 7.5.0.5 on Linux. I have some 32-bit Linux machines that need to be backed up. I still have the 6.5 installation CDs, so that's not a

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script

2013-05-02 Thread Neil Conner
_ > From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > [veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] on behalf of Neil Conner > [n...@mbari.org] > Sent: 01 May 2013 23:58 > To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update s

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script

2013-05-01 Thread William Brown
Conner [n...@mbari.org] Sent: 01 May 2013 23:58 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script Environment: NetBackup 7.5.0.5 on Linux. I have some 32-bit Linux machines that need to be backed up. I still have the 6.5 installation CDs, so

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script

2013-05-01 Thread Neil Conner
Environment: NetBackup 7.5.0.5 on Linux. I have some 32-bit Linux machines that need to be backed up. I still have the 6.5 installation CDs, so that's not a problem. But I'd like to install the 6.5.6 update to be consistent with my other clients. As near as I can tell, the scripts supplied w

[Veritas-bu] netbackup and mtx on same server

2013-03-20 Thread port
hi all! os : solaris 10 i have already worked fine mtx . After that i install netbackup 6.5. now when i execute /usr/local/sbin/mtx -f /dev/scsi/changer/c4t0d0 status no Data Transfer Element reported i reinstall mtx package but its not help me. must I remove the mtx package before Netbackup ins

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10 - Question / Query

2013-01-26 Thread dascott28
There is an agent for Netbackup to automate backups of Enterprise Vault. For more details see the following: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH126523 +-- |This was sent by dascot...@live.com via

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10 - Question / Query

2013-01-24 Thread Robin Small
the server, but a lot of it is accessible only to the account that's the specified EV Administrator (we use a service account here). Hope that helps, ~ Robin From: Simon Weaver [mailto:simon.wea...@iscl.net] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:55 AM To: Robin Small; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.ed

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10 - Question / Query

2013-01-24 Thread Simon Weaver
Sent: Wed 23/01/2013 16:14 To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10 - Question / Query I'm doing EV 10.0.3 backups through NBU 7.5.0.4 I use the directives and the database/app agent on my EV servers. I'm not sure if you kn

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification

2013-01-24 Thread Simon Weaver
Simon From: Anatoly Pugachev [mailto:mator...@gmail.com] Sent: Thu 24/01/2013 09:53 To: Simon Weaver Cc: George Winter; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification http://www.symantec.com/docs/HOWTO44506 On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification

2013-01-24 Thread Anatoly Pugachev
http://www.symantec.com/docs/HOWTO44506 On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Simon Weaver wrote: > Hello George > Many thanks that this as it is very very helpful information. > > Tell me I'm not fully aware of all the keywords in regards to the > intelligent policy for VM But is there some sort of w

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification

2013-01-23 Thread Simon Weaver
eaver > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:29 AM > To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification > > Hello again > 2 posts in a day :) Rare! > I am now looking at VMware Integration with vSphere 4.x and NB

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification

2013-01-23 Thread George Winter
Corp From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Simon Weaver Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:29 AM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification Hello again 2 posts

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10 - Question / Query

2013-01-23 Thread Robin Small
s? Are they local or point to an external sql server? ~ Robin From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Simon Weaver Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:13 AM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] N

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification

2013-01-23 Thread Simon Weaver
Hello again 2 posts in a day :) Rare! I am now looking at VMware Integration with vSphere 4.x and NBU 7.5.0.4. So far tests have gone well, but I got a quick question regarding RDM's. Essentially, I have over 1000 VM's with a mix of RDM's and no RDM's. Question: Is there any easy method in NBU,

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10 - Question / Query

2013-01-23 Thread Simon Weaver
Hi All I am looking for some advice or assitance in regards to Enterprise Vault Email Backups and NetBackup 7.5 Presently, I have been doing Full backups of all drive letters of the Server (Windows 2008 R2) and Diff backups during the week (Based on the Enterprise Vault details I found). Ho

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3 Catalog backup bug?

2012-12-10 Thread Justin Piszcz
Hi, In the bpdbm log: NBDBsystem: System call failed with status: 1792 validate_database: Database validation failed for database NBDB Justin. On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Hello, > > I see this every so often, was curious if anyone else has seen this with > 7.5.0.3? >

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3 Catalog backup bug?

2012-12-10 Thread Justin Piszcz
Hello, I see this every so often, was curious if anyone else has seen this with 7.5.0.3? 12/09/2012 22:27:30 - Info bpdbm (pid=22505) staging relational database files for catalog backup 12/09/2012 22:27:30 - Info bpdbm (pid=22505) staging NBAZDB backup to /usr/openv/db/staging 12/09/2012 22:27:3

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup appliance hangs

2012-11-19 Thread Rusty Major
If you're going to 1.4.3, check with Symantec on this first. Otherwise, if you want to go 1.4.2, make sure you get any other EEBs that go along with it. There is a RAID controller patch that is pretty important and I can't remember if it's in 1.4.2 or not. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Bluejay

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup appliance hangs

2012-11-19 Thread Bluejay Adametz
> It can be pinged, but console access is locked up, and ssh is > similarly non-responsive. After the node is power-cycled, the storage pool > comes back up and is happy until the next time. I've had this happen 3 > times this year, but two of those instances have happened in the last 3 > weeks.

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup appliance hangs

2012-11-19 Thread Jack . Forester
Anyone out there using NetBackup dedupe appliances (5000, 5020) in a multiple node configuration having any problems where a content router node seems to just hang and require power-cycling? I have a NetBackup 5000 appliance at one location at version 1.4.1.1 that for some reason just hangs. It

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1.0.3 and StorNext?

2012-10-10 Thread Barber, Daniel Layne (Layne) CTR DISA CDM (US)
Anyone have any experience backing up StorNext volumes. We are getting EXTREMELY slow backups of one of these types of volumes., it has thousands of small web content files. 7.1.0.3 HP-UX 11.31 Master and Media Servers Thank you, Layne ___ Veritas-b

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3: bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo() for x.x.x.

2012-09-06 Thread Michael Graff Andersen
It was because they wanted to redesign the reverse lookup zones to ease administration. They had forgotten to mention this and assumed that all clients dynamically registered at reboot in the maintenance weekend when the change was done. Regards Michael 2012/9/5 tsimerson : > I'm curious as to wh

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup , Vmware and Netapp

2012-09-06 Thread Bluejay Adametz
> As you have suggested Netbackup have a feature for backing up VMDK, But > that requires equal amount of space in the datastore. Please correct me if > i am wrong. I've been experimenting with this for the last week or so with NetBackup 7.5.0.3, and, no, it does not duplicate the VMDKs on the dat

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup , Vmware and Netapp

2012-09-06 Thread Abhishek Dhingra1
cc s...@mailman.eng.aub urn.edu Subject [Veritas-bu] Netbackup , Vmware

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup , Vmware and Netapp

2012-09-05 Thread Anurag Sharma
. !!! Anurag Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:40:00 -0400 From: wtsm...@maine.edu To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup , Vmware and Netapp I'd consider NetApp's Snap Mirror / Snap Vault. Cheers, Wayne On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Abhishek Dhingra1

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >