Hello,
We are running Veritas Volume Manager 5.1SP1 on solaris 10 and experiencing
problem to import one 4TByte disk group, which has two concatenated 2T disks.
The alerts(on our Veritas Operations Manager console when rebooting server) are
disk asm_25000_33 import failed. After server up, I
:* Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVm
Sorry for any confusion...
I've got several powerpath devices from a dead system that I'm mounting
temporarily on one node in my cluster. I run a devfsadm -Cv and vxdctl
enable. After that I can see the powerpath devices listed as...
emc_clarrion0_10 auto:none
Hello,
Panic string and previous messages usually helps to understand cause.. Release
notes to RP2-RP3 also provides short descriptions of fixed issues like Fixed
the cause of a system panic when mutex_panic() was called from
vol_rwsleep_wrlock().
On 29.03.2010, at 19:02, Collin wrote:
I've
The original message states mount these disks as
/dev/vx/dmp/emc_array_Xs6 . Perhaps this is normal behavior. Mounts are
of devices which receive I/O. A /dev/vx/dmp/... device entry isn't I/O
capable.
I think a clearer statement of what Collin intends to do is needed.
Bill
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010
Sorry for any confusion...
I've got several powerpath devices from a dead system that I'm mounting
temporarily on one node in my cluster. I run a devfsadm -Cv and vxdctl
enable. After that I can see the powerpath devices listed as...
emc_clarrion0_10 auto:none - -online
Couple questions:
Are the underlying volumes VxVM volumes? If so, why are you not mounting
the /dev/vx/dsk/DGNAME/volname objects?
If the devices actually /are/ powerpath devices (i.e., they're
metadevices coalescing the underlying EMC LUN paths), why aren't you
mounting the powerpath
[mailto:veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Collin
Sent: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 2:09 AM
To: William Havey
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVm
Sorry for any confusion...
I've got several powerpath devices from a dead system that I'm mounting
I've got the following
Solaris 10
VxVM 5.0MP3RP1HF12
I have a number of mount points that are being migrated from
/dev/dsk/cXtXdXsX to clustered mount points. The problem I'm having is if I
mount these disk in the /dev/dsk/cXtXdXsX format I run the risk that if
something were to
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Collin wrote:
I've got the following
Solaris 10
VxVM 5.0MP3RP1HF12
I have a number of mount points that are being migrated from /dev/
dsk/cXtXdXsX to clustered mount points.
I'm guessing you mean 'clustered' in the sense of in a cluster -
I've tested this with heavy IO to vx volumes and have no problems. So this is
online procedure.
With regards,
--
Anton Pavlenko
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:50:12AM +0100, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
Hi Anton,
how about:
rm /dev/vx/dmp/*
rm /dev/vx/rdmp/*
Regards
Przemek
On Fri,
Hello.
This procedure is online.
I've tested it now more then 10 times on production server where lots of
Oracle databases are working.
Anton Pavlenko
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:29:58PM +0100, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
Hi all,
it happened on production server where lots of Oracle
Sorry, I have forgotten: this is Solaris 10 + Veritas 5 MP3.
# vxdiskconfig
VxVM INFO V-5-2-1401 This command may take a few minutes to complete
execution
Executing Solaris command: devfsadm (part 1 of 2) at 09:22:26 CET
Executing VxVM command: vxdctl enable (part 2 of 2) at 09:22:31 CET
-
From: veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of William Havey
Sent: 26 October 2009 14:17
To: przemol...@poczta.fm
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM vxdctl ERROR V-5-1-0 Data
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:41:40PM +0100, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to add to a server new LUNs but face the following problem:
server:/root# vxdctl enable
VxVM vxdctl ERROR V-5-1-0 Data Corruption Protection Activated - User
Corrective Action Needed
VxVM vxdctl
In my previous post, I omitted the vxdisk rm step. Following the
procedure hinted at in the INFO message:
1) devfsadm -c disks
2) vxdisk rm c5t0d25
3) vxdctl enable
2009/10/27 przemol...@poczta.fm:
Sorry, I have forgotten: this is Solaris 10 + Veritas 5 MP3.
# vxdiskconfig
VxVM INFO
To recover, first ensure that the OS device tree is up to date (requires OS
specific commands).
You may want to try: devfsadm -C
This will clean up your device tree. From the devfsadm man page:
-C Cleanup mode. Prompt devfsadm to cleanup dangling
/dev links that
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Marianne Van Den Berg
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM patch 122058-12 requires obsoleted patch
128306-05
Hi Marianne,
Installing the latest patch should be sufficient if you are getting only
this patch dependecy problem for installing SF 50MP3 RP2.
Check this URL
--- On Thu, 9/10/09, Marianne Van Den Berg mvdb...@stortech.co.za wrote:
From: Marianne Van Den Berg mvdb...@stortech.co.za
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM patch 122058-12 requires obsoleted patch 128306-05
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 3:33 AM
Hi all
I'm
Hi all
I'm trying to install SF50MP3 RP2 on our Solaris 10 lab machines.
VxVM patch 122058-12 fails to completely install as it requires
obsoleted patch 128306-05.
My VxVM package shows PStamp as RP2, but Status says partially
installed.
I'm about to download and install patch 138269-02
Hi Friends,
any body have VXVM , Cluster CBTs? i am ready to pay..
--
Regards,
Sekhar.
___
Veritas-vx maillist - Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
Hi --
Is there any way to copy the configuration copy ( nconfig ) and log
copies ( nlog ) to another disk in the diskgroup?
I took a shot-gun approach earlier and just changed the nconfig total
and nlog totals using vxedit and a config/log copy were put on the 1 of
the 3 disks I am moving.
As others have pointed out, we don't really know which hardware and software
resources you've got at disposal.
- Most generic solution would be to use plexes to migrate the data.
- You'll need to mess around with zoning and masking on the SAN side
regardless of what option you take
- BCVs are
Hi all.
Sorry about the vague subject.
Here is the situation and I am really looking for any ideas or comments on the
following:
I have inherited 20TBs of data split between 2 Servers ( Solaris/Sunfire/Sol8)
ServerA and ServerB
Each Server has 2 diskgroups.
Oracle and Sybase Filesystems and
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM -- Moving Large Amounts of Data
Hi all.
Sorry about the vague subject.
Here is the situation and I am really looking for any ideas or comments on the
following:
I have inherited 20TBs of data split between 2 Servers ( Solaris/Sunfire/Sol8)
ServerA
Well,
Like Andrey said, your not being very specific on what you want the
end state to be or what versions you have, etc. That said, are BCV's
an option? They're tailor made for this kind of stuff. The array
would do all the work for you and the systems could be up while you're
doing
Finally got this working - thanks to Symantec support.
I've never had to go through quite this process before to use a lun, but
then again, I've never used an EFI labeled lun before either.
First, format the lun using the /dev/vx/rdmp name, and set the size of
partition 0 to 0tb, and label the
All,
We have several NetApp luns zoned on our Sun servers. Some are on the
order of 100 GB, but we have 7 that are 1 TB. So by default Solaris puts
the EFI label on the disk. Well, I can bring the smaller luns into a dg,
but the 1 TB luns will not work no matter what I try.
# vxdisk -f init
-Original Message-
From: veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Bryan
Bahnmiller
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 8:33 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM can't use 1 TB luns
All,
We have
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Bryan
Bahnmiller
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 8:33 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM can't use 1 TB luns
All,
We have several NetApp luns zoned on our Sun servers. Some are on the
order of 100 GB, but we have 7 that are 1 TB. So
greg.robin...@dsto.defence.gov.au
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January, 2009 12:14:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM can't use 1 TB luns
This is the types of errors I've been seeing all day:
# vxdisk -f init fas60800_0 type=auto format=sliced
VxVM vxdisk ERROR V-5-1
I have a Sun server which has 12 luns from a Clariion array presented
to it. I created Vx volumes on the PowerPath devices.
Then I zoned in 9 more luns from a 2nd Clariion array. Solaris sees
the devices, PowerPath has created the emcpower devices and VxVM sees
the emcpower devices. But I
Hello all,
I have a situation where one system is taking a long time to scan for
disk groups. I have a VCS cluster in a 4+1 configuration. I have
recently added the last production node to the cluster. After the disks
were presented to the failover node, it took a long time for any Vx
commands
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 5.0 and 4.x keys
Are the keys for 4.x and 5.0 compatable
Richard Bonfoey - Unix Systems Administrator
Alteon Training LLC
PO Box 34787, MC 20-74
Seattle, WA 98124-1787
Work 206-662-8006
Cell 206-218-4919
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan
Bahnmiller
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:42 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM disk group commands take too long
Hello all,
I have a situation where one system is taking a long time to scan for
disk groups. I have a VCS
:42 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM disk group commands take too long
Hello all,
I have a situation where one system is taking a long time to scan for
disk groups. I have a VCS cluster in a 4+1 configuration. I have
recently added the last production node
07, 2008 11:42 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM disk group commands take too long
Hello all,
I have a situation where one system is taking a long time to scan for
disk groups. I have a VCS cluster in a 4+1 configuration. I have
recently added the last
]
Sent: 04 September 2008 14:15
To: Harindra Patel
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi,
It is not going to create any problem for any of the volumes
running as per my understanding , it will only stop changing the ssb id
seqno=0.854
ssb: actual_seqno=0.4
with regards,
Harindra.
From: Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2008 13:45
To: Harindra Patel
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi ,
when the disk
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi,
You should'nt run vxdisksetup on that instead u should have tried
adding the disk after doing
vxdisk -f init c#t#d# privlen=value found from vxdisk list c#t#d#
then try adding the disk from this command
vxdg -g
: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi,
You should'nt run vxdisksetup on that instead u should have tried
adding the disk after doing
vxdisk -f init c#t#d# privlen=value found from vxdisk list c#t#d#
then try adding the disk from this command
vxdg -g diskgroup -k adddisk
giving me error as new disk even?
Harindra.
*From:* Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 04 September 2008 13:09
*To:* Harindra Patel
*Cc:* veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi Harindra
vxdg -g diskgroup set ssb=off can create problem to already running disks ?
Harindra.
*From:* Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 04 September 2008 14:03
*To:* Harindra Patel
*Cc:* veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi
: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi Harindra ,
This error u r getting because u have already cleared
all the data of the disk in the begining itself .By running vxdisksetup -i
C#T#D# . that has wiped out the entire data of both public and private
region
Hello,
Please enlighten me if the HBA information provided by VxVM DMP is HBA
port information or HBA Card information.
Regards,
Sweta Menon
LT Infotech
Manapakkam
Chennai
Larsen Toubro Infotech Ltd.
www.Lntinfotech.com
This Document is classified as:
LT Infotech Proprietary LT
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi,
It is not going to create any problem for any of the volumes
running as per my understanding , it will only stop changing the ssb id of
diskgroups with newly added disks.
Regards
Amit Srivastava
On 9/4/08
Hello,
Please enlighten me if the HBA information provided by VxVM DMP is HBA
port information or HBA Card information.
Regards,
Sweta Menon
LT Infotech
Manapakkam
Chennai
Larsen Toubro Infotech Ltd.
www.Lntinfotech.com
This Document is classified as:
LT Infotech Proprietary LT
Hi all,
I'm using VxVM 4.1 MP2 on Solaris 9 and have a strange problem. I'm
trying to add some disks to a diskgroup and I get the following error:
# /usr/lib/vxvm/bin/vxdisksetup -fi c2t216000C0FF892131d10
# /usr/lib/vxvm/bin/vxdisksetup -fi c2t216000C0FF892131d11
# vxdg -g TeachFS-DG adddisk
in public technotes on the topic.
Cheers,
jf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Bishop
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:59 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi all,
I'm using VxVM 4.1
Hi All,
I have just upgraded a test Solaris 8 server from SF 4.0 to SF 5.0
I used the upgrade_start and upgrade_finish scripts.
Upon doing a reboot vxconfigd does not start.
I can start it by hand and all seems well.
What is wrong?
I get the following error messages on the
Hi,
Sorry for crossposting as I am not sure if this is a VCS or VxVM problem.
We have a Veritas Cluster Server 4.0 running on two Solaris 8 (SPARC) nodes.
We had a power outage on one of the nodes A recently, then we started all
the stuff that was on node A on node B. Then we brought back node A
Hello,
You can easily do this and it just work. Also Sun have SUE disk, which
include veritas. Also there is a good instruction how to setup net boot
( not shure about wan boot) from SUE.
--
Antony Pavlenko
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:35:05PM +0100, Bernd Schemmer wrote:
Hi,
for maintenance
Antony,
You can easily do this and it just work.
Good to know, thanks for the confirmation.
Also Sun have SUE disk, which
include veritas. Also there is a good instruction how to setup net boot
( not shure about wan boot) from SUE.
I already heard about SUE - but until now I did not find
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Compatibility
Antony,
You can easily do this and it just work.
Good to know, thanks for the confirmation.
Also Sun have SUE disk, which
include veritas. Also there is a good instruction how to setup net boot
( not shure about wan boot) from SUE
Hi,
for maintenance purpose for our Sun Server we have created a Solaris
WANBOOT Image with VxVM 5.0 MP1 included.
The plan for using this WANBOOT Image is as follow:
- boot the Sun machine from the network using this WANBOOT image
- import the rootdg from the local disks
- do what ever
Not sure if this is a good idea when you want to do maintenance on a
Production box.
Consider this in your design to solve whatever issue you have:
1. Make 1 local disk available, keep it out of control of Veritas.
(altboot)
2. Create all the slices on altboot similar in size as the Root disk
am unable to initialize my disk array under VVM 4.0 (StorageTek D173).
When I select initialize disk veritas says it is unable to read the
disk geometry.
Trying to label the disk fails with Disk unformatted. Trying to format
results in a Read error (failing to read VTOC) with an error code
and
something must have gotten screwed up there.
Cheers,
- Mike.Myers at nwdc.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rumbidzayi Gadhula
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 12:35 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] vxvm
Hi Gurus,
I have a small problem for which I need your help.
My requirement is to copy data from one server A to a new server B but I have
to do it only through Veritas VxVM mirroring. The disks from server B are dual
zoned with server A. I have mirrored the plexes on Server A with the disks
Rajinder Bhalla wrote:
Hi Gurus,
I have a small problem for which I need your help.
My requirement is to copy data from one server A to a new server B but
I have to do it only through Veritas VxVM mirroring. The disks from
server B are dual zoned with server A. I have mirrored
Hi,
We've done this before to migrate data to new arrays and other servers
a while ago. After the plexes have fully synced you could do this:
- Dissasociate server B's LUNs from the DG:
vxplex -g dg dis server B volume plex name
vxedit -g dg -fr rm server B volume plex name
vxdg -g dg -k rmdisk
October 2007 02:51
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies, I think I have got to know why this is
happening with help from Mark. vxconfigd in debug mode shows that it
fails after it finds a symmetrix VCM device. So
Hello,
Have you tried to use vxinstall to do things like creating volboot, removing
install-db, etcetera?
ashish madhavan wrote:
Hi,
I have a Sun 220R to which I have assigned 1000 luns of 45 Mb (this is
to simulation a case) from a symmetrix. Host details are -
1. SunOS 5.10
madhavan
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:25 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Dmitry Glushenok; Mark Alleyne
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue
Thanks for your replies Dmitry and Mark. I had forgotten to run
vxinstall. But even after I had it could not start vxconfigd.So I
Hi All,
I am trying to do an unattended installation of VXVM, VXFS VSF4.1 software.
It seems that we can do with a response file. Have any one done this
before.
Can you provide your ideas on how you achieved this in your environment.
N. Goutham.
___
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:18:26PM +0530, Goutham N wrote:
N. Goutham == Goutham N [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
N. Goutham Hi All, I am trying to do an unattended installation
N. Goutham of VXVM, VXFS VSF4.1 software. It seems that we can
N. Goutham do with a response file. Have any
To: Goutham N
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VXVM unattended installation
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:18:26PM +0530, Goutham N wrote:
N. Goutham == Goutham N [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
N. Goutham Hi All, I am trying to do an unattended installation
N
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goutham
N
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 4:48 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VXVM unattended installation
Hi All,
I am trying to do an unattended installation of VXVM, VXFS VSF4.1
software.
It seems that we can do with a response file. Have
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 3.2 is incompatible on Solaris 10
This package, VxVM 3.2, is only supported on Solaris 2.6, 7,
and 8; however, you appear to be running Solaris 2.10.
That is not a supported version of Solaris.
The answer is rather obvious
Has anyone successfully performed a LiveUpgrade using VxVM encapsulated
rootdisks? If so, could you please outline the procedure you used to do
so?
Conceptually, it isn't difficult. Break the plexes on rootdg - remove
the root mirror disk from rootdg - perform your LiveUpgrade on the root
MIS
+1 718 510 8586
Nextel: 172*26*16684
=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Svoboda,
Michael Steven
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 1:35 PM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM encapsulated rootdisk
If you don't do an unencapsulate of the root mirror after you detach it,
you will have a world of pain if you try to boot from it. See man page
for vxunroot and there's a procedure for doing this manually floating
around on the web
Sorta. You can't can't boot from a currently detatched
Has anyone successfully performed a LiveUpgrade using VxVM encapsulated
rootdisks? If so, could you please outline the procedure you used to do
so?
Conceptually, it isn't difficult. Break the plexes on rootdg - remove
the root mirror disk from rootdg - perform your LiveUpgrade on the root
If the OS install/upgrade goes badly you may well hose the disk in the
other disk group. Unless maybe you were to deport it...but then how
could you boot it...
I was thinking you would remove the (old mirror) disk from the existing
DG, give it to LU for install/upgrade, then create/encap a new
and try to LU to u3
...ouch.
No I prefer a solid clean mirror break off or better yet just physically pull
the drive. Simple quick reliable
--Original Message--
From: Darren Dunham
To: Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Aug 16, 2007 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM encapsulated
the rest of
your storage. Obviously you will need a system running solaris 8 and v3.2
veritas to get the data off your other veritas filesystems and volumes
--Original Message--
From: Nath Pankaj-a22823
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Aug 14, 2007 3:59 AM
Subject: [Veritas-vx
Of Nath Pankaj-a22823
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:59 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 3.2 is incompatible on Solaris 10
Hi,
I have installed Solaris 10 and then while installing the VxVM
3.2 I am getting the following errors
This package
Of
Gowthaman N
Sent: 15 July 2007 08:24
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VXVM Shell Script Automation
Hi All,
Have any one done Shell script to automate the VXVM tasks for below
Mirroring,Creation of Disk Group,Adding/Removing/Growing LV,Relayout and
Growing/Shrink
(root)@fromage:~# fsck -N /dev/vx/rdsk/entcab1-dg/vol1
[...]
CORRECT BAD CG SUMMARIES? no
[...]
Not sure if I should run `fsck -Y' to fix this?!
There's not much else you can do. The fact that 'fsck' is running
mount -o ro /dev//mnt
Does it mount read only ? If so take a backup first then fsck it.
- Original Message
From: Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Friday, 6 July, 2007 3:06:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx
I am failing to mount vol1, but vol2 mounts just fine. Should I jsut run
fsck?
dg entcab1-dg default default 780001004546516.1101.fromage
dm entcab101c6t2d0s2 sliced 286711000652800 -
dm entcab102c6t2d1s2 sliced 286711000652800 -
dm entcab103c6t4d0s2
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:37:18PM, Darren Dunham wrote:
I am failing to mount vol1, but vol2 mounts just fine. Should I jsut run
fsck?
v vol1 -ENABLED ACTIVE 2001248256 SELECT
vol1-04 fsgen
pl vol1-04 vol1 ENABLED ACTIVE 2001248256 STRIPE
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 05:08:27AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:37:18PM, Darren Dunham wrote:
I am failing to mount vol1, but vol2 mounts just fine. Should I jsut run
fsck?
v vol1 -ENABLED ACTIVE 2001248256 SELECT
vol1-04 fsgen
pl
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 05:14:09AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 05:08:27AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:37:18PM, Darren Dunham wrote:
I am failing to mount vol1, but vol2 mounts just fine. Should I jsut run
fsck?
v vol1 -
Subject: Re: Re: [Veritas-vx] Vxvm issues with Aix disks
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:58 +0400
Just try to read PVID from the disk itself (not from ODM database) to make
sure the disk is readable
lquerypv -h /dev/hdisk6 80 10
Check up the pathes to the disk lspath -l hdisk6 and remove all the bad
Hi Gurus,
Had a quick question.
I presume vxvm allows continued access to data during data resync between
plexes of a mirror.
Is this the behaviour or is there any option which restricts data access
till the plexes are fully resynced?. Can i specify with any options that
data shoudl continue
For example when jumpstarting a new server that will have VxVM 5.0 and
Solaris 10 would one still recommend leaving 2 slices free with some space
on them?
Has anyone seen any docs for Solaris 10 best practices for VxVM or is the
same old same old as 3.x?
Thanks
For a new Solaris 10 installation (jumpstart), do I need to leave any free
space on the disk for the private region or should I say, is it recommended?
Also, the older solaris blueprints Boot Disk Management it explains how to
configure VxVM 3.x and to use the custom options of vxinstall, is
is issuing this.
-kiru
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Hudson
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:08 PM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 5.0 Solaris 5.10 Dmp help...
Ok
, December 11, 2006 5:08 PM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 5.0 Solaris 5.10 Dmp help...
Ok, Sun 6900, 5.10, VxVM 5.0
We are trying to unconfigure N0.IB6 (via cfgadm). To do so all I/O must
stop.
run vxdmpadm listctlr all
CTLR-NAME ENCLR-TYPE
Ok, Sun 6900, 5.10, VxVM 5.0
We are trying to unconfigure N0.IB6 (via cfgadm). To do so all I/O must
stop.
run vxdmpadm listctlr all
CTLR-NAME ENCLR-TYPE STATE ENCLR-NAME
=
c3 EVA8000 ENABLED EVA80001
Title: CorporateMailSIGl
Hi,
It seems that you already have your root disk mirrored.
Using vxdiskadm menu and vxmirror command you can't create more than
one mirror.
You should mirror every volume in your root disk (root, swap and so on)
and after run a vxbootsetup command
Regards
Long
91 matches
Mail list logo
