We are currently using a Hauppauge ImpactVCB card for display capture
in our next generation Pencil Tester. Using the 6.4 bttv drivers for
Linux, I'm seeing 4-5 black pixels at either end of the scanline on both
a displayed and captured image. The desire is to display and capture a
640x480
I believe the standard you're referring to is ATVEF-A, see:
http://www.atvef.com/library/spec1_1a.html
The ATVEF-A data is on line 21 of the odd frames, along with the CC
data. It's teletext-2 format (so you can differentiate it from CC
data). Try watching some of the mid-afternoon
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 around 19:57:26 -0400, German Poo Caaman~o wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, German Poo Caaman~o wrote:
I'm trying a Bravado 1000 videocard (Truevision) with followings chips:
- Phillips SAA7110A WP --- Tried with Pauline Middelink's driver
- AMCC PCI MatchMaker 55933Q
Greetings,
I am interested in using the gpio and i2c for a couple of
upcomming projects.
If I have a seperate device driver and I want to do some
reads/writes on these busses, then can I use call the
bttv driver to access the ports?
Is the access granted from user space also?
I see that
Neil Okamoto wrote:
I don't know about the EZCAMII, but the EZCAM is supported at:
http://webcam.sourceforge.net/
I know, but EZCAMII does not seem to be a CPiA webcam which is all that project
cares about. So I thought I'd ask if anyone had looked into this Conexant device.
I am looking for an appropriate mailing list to discuss miscellaneous
video encoding, video editing, video hardware for Unix-type systems. Does
anyone have any suggestions?
In particular, at this time, I am seeking advice/information about video
encoding formats.
I am working on writing an
A friend of mine made me a deal... He said that he would buy me a tv
tuner card if I recorded some show for him on a daily basis and had it
avalible for him to download... This is because he doesn't get cable,
and I do. Anyways, this seems like a pretty good deal to me, I figure
it would be
This patch, against 2.4.0-test10-pre6, updates bttv to use the new and
groovy method of supporting mmap.
Advantages:
* Code more simple.
* mmap now only limited to number of free pages in the system.
* mmap no longer requires vmalloc, or remap_page_range.
Disadvantages:
* Requires videodev API
Hello,
I have installed the usb-backport from www.suse.cz and
ov511's driver version 1.25 from alpha.dyndns.org for a USB
creative Webcam III. Besides usb-uhci complaining when I modprobe
it with the webcam connected,
#modprobe usbcore
#modprobe usb-uhci
usb-uhci.c: Detected 2
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 around 09:24:52 -0800, Jon Pennington wrote:
On Sat, 28 October 2000, Justin Schoeman wrote:
I want to do distribution-quality video capture with my bt878 or Zoran 36120
(which I can't get to work at the moment), and then put that on a VCD format media.
Am I asking
http://148.231.197.98/cgi-bin/w3cam.cgi?input=composite%20norm=ntsc
http://148.231.197.98/cgi-bin/w3cam.cgi?help
maybe somone can help me with this one
I know I still need to upgrade the Bttv driver
and havent figured out what to use or how
one site I found a diff that supposedly needs to be
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000 around 09:33:12 +1300, Glenn Ramsey wrote:
I am getting different results when using different applications
to capture images from a video camera and I wonder if anyone can
help me sort out what might be wrong.
Using xawtv (3.12) or broadcast2000 the captured image seems
This can be disregarded, since I sent it in OCTOBER and have since gotten
a card.
-Aaron Solochek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Aaron Solochek wrote:
A friend of mine made me a deal... He said that he would buy me a tv
tuner card if I recorded some show for him on a daily basis
Aaron Solochek wrote:
A friend of mine made me a deal... He said that he would buy me a tv
tuner card if I recorded some show for him on a daily basis and had it
avalible for him to download... This is because he doesn't get cable,
and I do. Anyways, this seems like a pretty good deal to
Hello all,
I have a simple task where I am trying to simply read ov511 based camera and
dump pictures to the drive.
I grabbed vgrabber.c, which helped a lot, but for some reason, it takes 1
second to take a picture.
Am I doing something wrong here? I really would like 20-30 fps.
-- Devin
For everyone's information:
I've started a list of V4L tips to help people try and get V4L up and
running. It's not complete, and somewhat raw, but it does contain some
good tips.
You can find it at:
http://www.eecs.lehigh.edu/~rjm2/v4l-notes.txt
I've also written a C++ API for V4L capture
Hi,
I hope I have provided the necessary information for this information.
I have the following hardware:
Nividia TNT2 Ultra 32MB (Viper V770)
Bt-878A (PixelView PlayTV Pro PV-BT878+ w/FM)
Im currently running:
RH 6.1 (all changed around)
Kenel 2.4.0
Nvidia 0.9-5 drivers
xawtv 3.30
bttv 0.7.50
I think the changes in 2.2.18pre2's bttv.c and friends have broken
something. Here's how things go:
solvent:/home/ian# /usr/local/bin/tv-on
insmod videodev
insmod i2c-core
insmod i2c-dev
insmod i2c
insmod tuner type=2
insmod msp3400
insmod bttv card=10
dmesg output:
Linux video capture
Hello *,
I'd like to comment on the current v4l -
v4l2 discussion, because I think that some things
are going in the wrong direction at the moment.
1) backward-compatibility layer in v4l2
I still dont see the need of a v4l-backward
compatibility layer in v4l2. To be honest:
it's more or a less
Hello *,
I'd like to comment on the current v4l -
v4l2 discussion, because I think that some things
are going in the wrong direction at the moment.
1) backward-compatibility layer in v4l2
I still dont see the need of a v4l-backward
compatibility layer in v4l2. To be honest:
it's more or a less
Hi everyone,
I'm looking for technical information on the FlyWindows98 video
card.
I'll have to write a extremelly fast and very specific capture
driver for this camera to be used in a critical real-time system.
I know this is not the best card (maybe not even a
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 03:59:45PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I am looking for an appropriate mailing list to discuss miscellaneous
video encoding, video editing, video hardware for Unix-type systems. Does
anyone have any suggestions?
I'm new, so this list has a bit too much information
Thanks for the info. I had looked at v4l and X source code, including
i810_video.c, but didn't know about xf86XVRegisterOffscreenImages (actual
spelling). I can see that in the mga driver source.
Regarding "offscreen surface support":
Other than the source code, is there any way to tell that
Hello,
I have an application where we need to use two bt878-based
frame-grabbers on the same machine (to simultaneously capture video from
two cameras). I can get images from 1 card, but only get fuzz if I plug
in two cards.
Before delving into the driver source, I thought I should check with
Hello *,
I'd like to comment on the current v4l -
v4l2 discussion, because I think that some things
are going in the wrong direction at the moment.
1) backward-compatibility layer in v4l2
I still dont see the need of a v4l-backward
compatibility layer in v4l2. To be honest:
it's more or a less
Hello,
I still have problems to kill the kwintv-process.
It doesn´t work with kill -9 or fuser -k -9 /dev/video.
fuser shows:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/video root 1798 m kwintv
I can not reload the module, because the device it still
Hi,
I've seen lots of development work related to capturing NTSC/PAL video
and simply displaying it (video4linux, video4linux2 for TV tuner cards,
etc.)
However, I haven't seen much (any ...?) information or projects related
to overlaying graphics on top of captured video.
With
Does anyone have experience to connect with TV through a card
(for example DC10Plus) ?
Thank you in advance.
Junzo Tamada
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi, every body.
I just got this video card a few weeks ago. on the box, it says it
supports linux, but the problem is I cannot make it work with RedHat 6.2.
the support group of ELSA said that some people could make this video card
work with linux, but they don't know how. So, if anyone
I believe the standard you're referring to is ATVEF-A, see:
http://www.atvef.com/library/spec1_1a.html
The ATVEF-A data is on line 21 of the odd frames, along with the CC
data. It's teletext-2 format (so you can differentiate it from CC
data). Try watching some of the mid-afternoon
Is it just my Netscape mail reader or are have other
people also started getting repeats of mail from as
far back as September?
Thanks,
Scott
___
Video4linux-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its not just you. They're coming, and in force.
"Scott A. Herod" wrote:
Is it just my Netscape mail reader or are have other
people also started getting repeats of mail from as
far back as September?
Thanks,
Scott
___
Video4linux-list
Michael,
You note that the discussion of XV_DONT_BLIT_THE_COLORKEY is on the xpert list.
Should general discussion of Xv issues be on that list? It's awfully busy. I
posted on this list because I think of it as the "Video For Linux" list (video
issues on Linux) rather than the "Video4Linux"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the changes in 2.2.18pre2's bttv.c and friends have broken
something. Here's how things go:
Call me anal but, shouldn't you try using the release version of 2.2.18
first, instead of reporting bugs in an old pre-release version?
- Eric
This is a simple question. I am trying to accurately see
how many frames i can grab and write per second using the
v4l interface on my slow mule box.
If my understanding is correct, with mmap, VIDIOCSYNC, frees
a specified frame and then the driver fills the mapped memory
with a video image.
Eric Jorgensen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the changes in 2.2.18pre2's bttv.c and friends have broken
something. Here's how things go:
Call me anal but, shouldn't you try using the release version of 2.2.18
first, instead of reporting bugs in an old pre-release
Peter Kaczowka wrote:
You mention "the next few years" - but in the next few years video will be
going digital; much of it already is. Isn't all the below discussion
relevant only to analog video?
Yes and No...
The current ATVEF-A standard is for analog video, but the standard is
You mention "the next few years" - but in the next few years video will be
going digital; much of it already is. Isn't all the below discussion
relevant only to analog video? With digital video, ATVEF-type information
wouldn't be encoded in specific scanlines, would it? Does ATVEF
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 01:56:49PM -0500, Peter Kaczowka wrote:
Regarding "offscreen surface support":
Other than the source code, is there any way to tell that you have "offscreen
surface support"?
Not afaict, no. Without it, XvPutVideo still works (driver bugs aside, of
course), it is just
Hello,
I have an odd problem with my bttv. The video and sound works fine, well
kind off. If I want sound in xawtv I have to "mute" it and if I don't
want sound I turn the volume 100% ! And the sound is coming through one
speaker only.
I'm running a Gallant card, which is unsupported and the
rrubio wrote:
We are currently using a Hauppauge ImpactVCB card for display capture
in our next generation Pencil Tester. Using the 6.4 bttv drivers for
Linux, I'm seeing 4-5 black pixels at either end of the scanline on both
a displayed and captured image. The desire is to display and
41 matches
Mail list logo