Well, the good news is I worked out a compromise. The bad news is the
video I just spent 10+ hours working on will never be posted.
She wants me to sever all connection to her from the video, remove her
name, the metatags and the youtube response connection so that nobody
watching her stuff
Thank you, Jason, for contributing something that was well-timed, direct in
its intention and in context. And my tongue is not in my cheek when I say
that.
Videoblogging is fantastic and presents awe-inspiring opportunities, but it
is by no means a road to Damascus, a Utopia or a space free of
Jesus. This is getting so very, very ridiculous and out of hand.
What are you? On dope?
How many of us came out and said 'stop it' when this latest blog
post came out beating up on Zadi's show? ? Are you freaking kidding
me? Very few! You know why? Because very few people saw it as Steve
All I have to say is BALLS!
-Lan
www.LanBui.com
With regards to all non-French people who use Blip.tv.
Loiez Deniel lives in Rural France near to Claremont Feront, if you
google map it, you will see that he lives slap bang in the middle of
france, about oh lets see at least 3-4 hours away from Paris.
He has complain bitterly about
Thx Paul to help me to be understood ;-)
In France we have the best offer DSL in the world and the cheapest.
With the growth of the video the issue in 2008 will be who will pay
the bandwidth?
There was recently a very important meeting of ISPs in Paris on the
subject.
We are now doing videos
Oh its the naked conversations man, who has proven time and time again that he
cant
handle naked conversations.
Leadership being beaten upon? What leadership? I thought this place worked
quite well
because the only leaders are those leading any particular conversation at one
moment in
time.
so much for living in the now :)
On Dec 24, 2007, at 12:20 AM, ractalfece wrote:
Otherwise, she will hunt me down, her team is researching my website
server right now to have it shut down. She will ask youtube to delete
my entire account. She says she will begin a two year legal battle.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Robert Scoble
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't get where this is coming from.
I'm outta here. You discuss amongst yourselves. If you think it's
perfect,
and I'm wrong, that's cool.
The consistent thing I notice about Scoble is that he is a surface
guy.
Hello,
This is my first post here.
Just to say that I saw Loiez's site for the first time yesterday,
following a link on Robert Croma's site. The video's loaded virtually
instantly and all worked perfectly. I'm in Upstate New York (Stone
Ridge).
It's wonderful work.
Sam
Thanks Paul :) Merry Christmas to you and everyone else who celebrates!
Cheers!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Huddack should have been Time Magazine's Person of the Year!!!
Mike Huddack should also be nominated for next years Nobel peace
:) Merry Christmas Loiez. You should be on the new bandwidth now. Please let
us know
if it helps!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx Mike
That is a great gift for xmas !
Peace, love and vlogging
Loiez
Le 24 déc. 07 à 15:10, mikehudack a
The flurry of videoblogging messages must, I assumed, mean an
argument brewing over here. And I was right.
Now I don't know much about the original spark. I've become a lurker
more than a full-fledged participant. But I did notice Mr. Scoble
saying a community becomes how it treats its
Well, this list doesn't do it for me much anymore either. I dont
really get that much support from the list. This is not to say that
this is not a supportive community or that its gone bad, its just that
I personally dont get that much from it anymore.
People are not as moved as they seemed to
Well, the good news is I worked out a compromise. The bad news is the
video I just spent 10+ hours working on will never be posted.
She wants me to sever all connection to her from the video, remove her
name, the metatags and the youtube response connection so that nobody
watching her
yeah! That's perfect now
Thx from France
LOiez
Le 24 déc. 07 à 16:17, mikehudack a écrit :
:) Merry Christmas Loiez. You should be on the new bandwidth now.
Please let us know
if it helps!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx Mike
I posted a film that I made on the writer J.G.Ballard in 1983 here:
http://ommane.blogspot.com/
The video file is hosted on blip.tv were it runs fine. When I click on
the image on my new blog it doesn't go through to blip but launches
Windows Media Player were it runs very small and without
Andrew, I saw your post yesterday and read the dembot blog post as a
result. I never responded, however, because I'm not sure what I
foresee the future of networks being so I didn't have a meaningful
reply. Maybe it was the same for others here.
Regarding the dying of the list ... rage
Plays fine with sound from both locations, but I'm using flip4mac on a
macbook pro, so that might have something to do with it. Flip4mac
allows wmv files to play in Quicktime.
Tried to download the file to have a look at its guts, but it crashed Firefox :(
Try posting the file with blip's copy
Just the other day I posted what I would consider a pretty relevant
topic about the changing industry, mentioned I had been working on a
hypothesis for quite some time and then asked for thoughts but didn't
get a single response here. It wound up on Techmeme with links from
Mashable,
Nice post, I pretty much totally agree with you there.
I think Ive moaned about this in the past year or so, I miss a large number of
people and
their opinions.
I suppose it was easier to talk about things when it was fresher. There is
probably as much
new stuff happening, in terms of
I posted a film that I made on the writer J.G.Ballard in 1983 here:
http://ommane.blogspot.com/
The video file is hosted on blip.tv were it runs fine. When I click on
the image on my new blog it doesn't go through to blip but launches
Windows Media Player were it runs very small and
Jan and Jay.
Thanks for the help - I'll give it a go.
I notice other threads here bemoning the usefullness of the group -
so as a new vlogger (but long time independent media producer), I'd
just like to say thanks to everyone here who helps others - seems
useful to me!
-Sam
So does anyone know of any blip-like sites that loiez could probably
try until either blip or french telecom get their collective acts
together? Baring in mind that Loiez uses widescreen HD, even
sometimes super widescreen in his work.
DivX Stage6 might be a good choice, although I don't see
For what it's worth, we've moved Loiez over to the new bandwidth (along with
another
person or two who e-mailed us) and all should be good in France now. Please
drop me a
line ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) if you'd like to have your bandwidth upgraded in
advance of the overall
switch, which will be a
end of the year such clockwork.
it might help to do what i do.
that is to look at this Yahoo Mailing List Group as merely one channel
among many.
i don't consider this yahoo group a community. and we can debate
what a community is as well.
there was a time when videoblogging community
Adam, I wanna rape puppies with you. 3
And this is why I lurk.
ER
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad to see Calacanis took time off from raping puppies, or whatever
he does
out there in the Hall of Doom, to be the voice of reason here.
Funny to
Come celebrate in person at Jonny's Brooklyn Par-tay, this Weds 9PM in
Park Slope--Or hang out with us online http://jonnygoldstein.com
I kind of have to chuckle at how jaded so many people in this thread
seem to be, talking about videoblogging as if it's a bum-legged horse
that you can't bring yourself to take round the back of the barn and
shoot in the head.
To people like me - and, I think, the world at large - serial
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Robert Scoble
I quit Microsoft because of this community (seriously, this
community played
a big role in my decision) and it just hasn't lived up to its
potential.
This is determined by whom...?
ER
What's the best technical example I can use here... hmm.. oh yeah, the
one that TRAFFIC != indicator of value or quality.
Hell, even in the web space where 'time spent on site' is replacing
the click counting.
I'm willing to think the Road Node and Node 101s don't get the
numbers, numbers,
Hello gang,
Has anyone ever dealt with embedding URL hot-spots in FLV video? I
think this is the best approach to monetize an online show via product
placement that allows the end-user to click on the product featured
and have a new tab pop up without stopping the show.
I did some searchin' and
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, missbhavens1969
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesus. This is getting so very, very ridiculous and out of hand.
What are you? On dope?
There's fighting between siblings, and there's fighting between
enemies. The casual observer can be mistaken. But I believe
I'm not talking making people ashamed for having conversations, I'm
talking about how their heads are stuck on sticks and paraded around town.
It's very Lord Of The Flies, and nobody deserves to be treated as Piggy.
But maybe in your world they do. Your actions are showing that that is how
you
I'm not talking making people ashamed for having conversations, I'm
talking about how their heads are stuck on sticks and paraded around town.
It's very Lord Of The Flies, and nobody deserves to be treated as Piggy.
But maybe in your world they do. Your actions are showing that that is how
I think it's in the presentation, guys. This group irritates me on far
more occasions than not, so I just keep my mouth shut and lurk and
only chime in if I feel I have something to contribute. Reading only
the stuff that makes me happy does not make me, as an individual, any
smarter. And within
You are right, it is a wiki and as a member here I guess I should just cut
it out.
When I think about the future and what I am proud of that I have done in
this field and on this list, having a list like that is not something I
think is needed. And yes, I did find it very offensive, manly because
I cannot figure out how, in a group that sometimes seems so EXTREMELY
focused on the purely commercal side of videoblogging lately, some
people feel the group is ANTI such things and operates as a lynch mob
along those lines. I still see plenty of all kinds of discussion here.
I also think a
Has anyone ever dealt with embedding URL hot-spots in FLV video? I
think this is the best approach to monetize an online show via product
placement that allows the end-user to click on the product featured
and have a new tab pop up without stopping the show.
I did some searchin' and
Should have added to that: and if we can't argue with each other about
the resulting issues, and criticize each other, why have the group at
all? Easy enough to form happy little support listservs to focus on
the various niches and genres. This group is about, or at least I
thought it was, a
You hit the nail on the head:
Instead of putting those sorts of hate/spite posts on the group wiki, PLEASE
feel free to use Evilvlog!
EVERYONE is always welcome to post on Evilvlog. Admin and Password: anon
Or email me offlist and we'll get you your own account, so you can use your
own name.
Blabbermouth!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You hit the nail on the head:
Instead of putting those sorts of hate/spite posts on the group
wiki, PLEASE
feel free to use Evilvlog!
EVERYONE is always welcome to post on Evilvlog.
I asked the question on the Hummingcrow post Am I the only who
believes that most of the concerns brought up in this video should
have been handled privately?
I have no problem with people giving criticism of others. It helps
artists grow with when they get feedback, negative or positive. My
If I were suspicious about how one is using advertising on their show
and I had some questions about it, I would privately relay my
questions through an email to the right people and keep it there.
She did. Cheryl clearly states in the video that she e-mail Zadi and Steve
about it before
Terry, Cheryl's post was not an accusation.. She didn't state anything
that needed backing up. And the post (how many times does this have
to be said) wasn't about targeting Epic-Fu, they were used as an
example illustrating how she COULDN'T know what was behind the product
usage - in a post that
Yeah, I use the blip overlay ads option on my main site player. It
appears in the first minute or so and you can close it if you so
choose. You can check it out here http://www.cultofuhf.com if you want
to see an example.
It has seemed to work for the most part.
Rev.
--- In
Hello Brooke
Cheryl's post was not an accusation
Yes, Cheryl didn't directly accuse anyone of anything. But questions,
perhaps fairly or unfairly, have a way of appearing as so. And she did
say, Since I don't know, I don't trust. That's strong language in my
book.
And the post (how many times
Guys, I am not talking about overlays. I am talking about hotspots
assigned visually and not intrusively indicating that user can click
on it to learn more. Look closely at the examples I found...
http://www.flashloaded.com/flashcomponents/hotflashvideo/
Excuse me.
Cheryl sent us an email letting us know she would be criticizing our
content for being bubble gum content. We responded with examples of
the important issues we try to bring up, the interests of our
audience, and so forth.
At no point did she ever ask us about sponsored links, how we
Depite some Inflammatory and knee jerk comments, it seems like a giant
win for all concerned.
Brook, how can your livelihood being threatened by your professional
integrity being called into question be a win for us?
We are out there doing this with no safety net. Our show depends on
its
I know I'm not the most knowledgable person when it ones to Christian
holidays, but can I still toss those sorts of people away for Lent?
Maybe that question is for a more religious listserv...
On 12/24/07, Steve Woolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depite some Inflammatory and knee jerk comments,
Are you a Tech Elitist?
http://blog.fastcompany.com/experts/bcammack/2007/12/are_you_a_tech_elitist.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/yth5av
--
Bill Cammack
CammackMediaGroup.com
Wow. Well, I didn't take Cheryl's post as questioning your integrity.
If anything it seemed like there was an assumption because of who you
guys are that everything was probably being done with integrity, but
the problem was that there was no way for anyone to know that. Again,
basic media
On the other hand, aspects of ensuing discussions make me fear that
any discussion that touches on sensitive personal or livelihood
matters for anyone involved will devolve, no matter how things are
originally expressed, into this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdzLFNELeCI
Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays everyone!
Thank you.
Yeah, there are a couple others ... There was also a member of this
group that had a demo link posted of a idea s/he had to do multiple
product placements. Do a few searches or someone here may have a link
handy.
I think I posted at least one recently on this list but I could be
wrong. Whatever
Steve,
I just got finished reading all these posts here on the list surrounding all
this.
As you already know, I am the one that called you guys corporate whores on
Twitter. Yep.
A pretty harsh statement to make.
After watching your response video and pondering on what you guys said, I cant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSs92_sRNMw
--
http://geekentertainment.tv
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT
-- Forwarded message --
From: lawgeek
FYI, you might want to also point out to people that if someone sends a
copyright takedown to YouTube over your video, you can always
counternotice to YouTube that it is a fair use and it will go back up
within 10-14
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the blog post that Andrew posted:
http://dembot.com/post/22117963
There are classic insights like, While the rest of the world is
blooming online, TV has no new content to offer right now.
I read it, and was
Cheers David, onward and upward!
On Dec 24, 2007, at 11:26 AM, David wrote:
Andrew, I saw your post yesterday and read the dembot blog post as a
result. I never responded, however, because I'm not sure what I
foresee the future of networks being so I didn't have a meaningful
reply. Maybe it
On Dec 24, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
Collaboration not as easy as it should be, but is this a failure
of tools or a
failure of will?
Ah the metaphsical. If I could just prove that space is finite and
time is infinite then I could show by deduction that the problem is
Andrew,
I did read your post on this the other day. You summed up the state
of the studio pretty well.
I believe the nail in their coffin will be the new media buyers
taking over the status-quo positions. Part of my job is to research
new opportunites for new media buys. Once the old
You sir, are the model for the new breed of CEO.
I'll be completely disappointed if I find out your Chumby or
Nabaztag is the one responding with all the great customer service.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mikehudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) Merry Christmas Loiez. You should
On Dec 24, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Sull wrote:
i'm glad you received appreciation and offers based on that post...
but i can assure you...or maybe at least bet... that if it were I or
many others that tossed that blog post up no such offers,
publicity or appreciation would result.
This is
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel like this with the group while trying to discuss
the writers strike. The implications of the strike are so perfectly
tied into the subject matter that so many people here discuss, its
just *weird* its not
66 matches
Mail list logo
