I also experimented, using Blogger, with channel networks and show players
http://videoactiv.blogspot.com/
while making much use of Vodpod.
The point being that you can bend Blogger templates by hacking them every
which way.
But as to what constitutes the best design for a videoblog -- I
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mgmoon mgm...@... wrote:
Ratbag ... once you go Mac, you'll never go back.
That's what i was afraid of...
I've been a long time Windows XP user with a few explorations of Ubuntu. Since
it looks like I'll need to get a new computer and my daughter works in an Apple
store (having amde it to 'Expert' this week) -- I'm wondering about switching
over to Mr Jobs' handiwork.
But what would I need to
I'm a Blogger template user for a range of blog and multimedia options.
What theme best suits video presentation is sure to be a personal preference
--as will be preferred platform -- but I now use a simple Blogger theme by
Quite Random, STRIPPED
http://quiterandom.com/freebies/stripped/
Eagle-eyed blip.tv users might have noticed that we added VodPod to the
distribution dashboard this week. This means that you can now easily
distribute your show to the very enthusiastic viewers and curators that hang
out at vodpod.com. But a new audience is only half of what makes Vodpod
(1) Yes, Windows Movie Maker Portable is I think limited to XP and before as
it is a revamp of an old release before Microsoft rolled back some of the
features.
(2) I'm still experimenting by saving my videos and opening up various renders
in different programs to see m what my options are.
FYI
You can also get VirtualDub Portable
http://portableapps.com/apps/music_video/virtualdub_portable
and Movie Maker Portable
http://www.winmatrix.com/forums/index.php?/topic/23092-update-portable-original-movie-maker-for-7/
with 147 Transitions and 76 effects ...capturing some older features
I realize that this a perennial topic but I suffer from dissatisfaction with my
present editing protocol and software.
I've been using Sony Vegas Platinum 9.0 and it's an OK way of handling clips
but I find the text options cumbersome and too snazzy for my needs. What I
really like are the
I realize that this a perennial topic but I suffer from dissatisfaction with my
present editing protocol and software.
I've been using Sony Vegas Platinum 9.0 and it's an OK way of handling clips
but I find the text options cumbersome and too snazzy for my needs. What I
really like are the
I should point out that I'm still experimenting.
(1)Especially if I have a lot of clips to edit down I import them into
VirtualDub (either direct Capture using VD or by using the capture option of
another program) and edit away by paring down the content into a single file.VD
imports
Thanks Jay and Mark for the info on digital compresion etc..
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/75314
Since I'm on a roll with my out and about, here's my latest hardware
escapade...[It suits me.]
I've been experimenting with ways to carry my shooting rig around with me so
It seems that I prefer to shoot and edit as though I'm a 21st century
Eisenstein pretender: slim cuts, moving quickly through a short segment.
While this may be my want I'm wondering how much digital mbs I'm leaving behind
in the file that isn't actually being displayed so that my finished file
OI seem to have missed something in my efforts.
I format my video files in h264 and QuickTime movie but when I post them
automatically from Blip.Tv they arrive on my blog sites as .mov files when I
prefer Flash. (And visitors need QuickTine installed to watch them online).
Am I missing
YouTube habits have encouraged a ready use of flash players online. But few
people I mix with are aware that the .mov file option I offer is a much better
viewing experience.
So what means do folk employ to get visitors to consider either downloading or
watching the .mov file instead of the
Local ABC radio (Australia)here has a show called The Media Report.
It's quite good on matters to do with old and new media.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/mediareport/default.htm
Anyway a recent segment on the foreign correspondant dealt with
freelance video jounalists working alone with small video
The mic problem is very challenging. I had a podcasting rig made up of
a Sony (HiMD) minidisc player/recorder plus assorted plug in power
microphones.
These mics won't work plugged into my camera as they require a preamp.
I had been using another vid camera (for a week)and that took the plug
in
I own up to a lot of confusion.
When you follow the dictates of various videoblogging expertise the
h.264 codec is a standard recommendation. Not h.263 or just MPEG.4 but
it has to be the Real McCoy.
Assuming that's correct I have a couple of questions:
(1) Can a file only be rendered to h.264
Steve Watkins writes:
What format do you encode to presently?
Thanks Steve..I experimented with *Sony AVC* and created a template to
engineer that. But I'm experimenting where I can.
So I got myself Quicktime Pro and started to work that into my
protocols and then this issue came up in
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Krystian Morgan k...@... wrote:
Actually in wordpress you can make a post stick at the top of the
list like a featured post.
And in Blogger you have a couple of hacks you can use to the same effect:
(1) You can pre date the post to a future date so that
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathpa...@... wrote:
So I go back to my first statement and ask, Is RSS in effect part of
the problem? Is it so easy now to just watch that we are becoming
passive? That we no longer care about the communication or the
connections that can
The core complication isn't so much video per se but the whole Web 2.0
multimedia explosion. Text is easy to format and showcase -- we've
been laying it out for centuries -- but digital media is a major
complication.
I come from audio blogging/podcasting and the rot sets in when you try
to
While I'm new to videoblogging I'm keen to quickly explore my options.
The recommendations for publishing online carried in BlipTV
http://blip.tv/learning/export/
seem to parallel those promoted by other sources such as Dedman, etc.
I've got a low RAM pc such that many video editing programs are
I was going to write something about Vodpod a few days ago but Vodpod
and I had a misunderstanding.
[But now we're sweet and I was wrong.So I'm eating crow.*]
Vodpod
http://vodpod.com/
is a video aggregator which functions as a Firefox add on. It's rather
neat
AS JAY pointed out:I always wanted to see podcasters record stories
with people. Shorter snippets. Maybe audio diaries. Maybe just a bunch
of natural sounds? Give me a good 10 minutes of something I cant hear
on the radio.
In my very newbie status I have been overwhelmed -- I think that's the
Hi,
I'm brand new to the list. Located in Brisbane, Australia. For the
past few years I've been a podcaster and I produce a few podcasts on
various topics. I also have recorded a few public gatherings for web
sharing
While I used to deploy slideshows and digital presentations in my
blogs as
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually listen to a handful of podcasts that give good information
and dont waste my time.
For what it's worth there are two other differences between the two
media in way of delivery:
(1) For producers of content,
26 matches
Mail list logo
