--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "LeanBackVids.com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can everyone move the business/money talk over to the
> "videobloggingbusiness" group?
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videobloggingbusiness/
>
> It gets tiring reading about everyone's hopes to cash in on
v
> It's also blatantly obvious that 99% will never get paid
> any significant money, because that's exactly how blogging has already
> played out and it's exactly how podcasting and vlogging will play out.
> Actually, I'd bet in the end more like 99.9%, because frankly most
> people are not goin
The problem with seeing the history in that way is that there is never
actually a 'pure' rejection of any particular topic or idea here, its
just different human beings talking, arguing.
Perceptions differ. Personalities cloud the issues. A personal clash,
someone like me having a rant and bei
I used to have over one thousand unread, until I deleted them all.
Now I have just 12.
I have a new method for keeping up.
I have my videoblogging group messages go to a separate folder, as I
have always, but now I keep that folder sorted by subject.
So when I see a subject that I'm not in
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clint Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Otherwise, I'm perfectly happy to pack up my stuff and leave,
> because frankly this kind of attitude is getting on my last damn nerve.
> Clint
>
Don't get Clint angry. Nobody likes an angry Clint!
RAWR!
schlomo:)
cooper3acd wrote:
>
> By allowing a certain amount of biz talk within the group, the group
> has the opportunity to help mold the future of some of the
> businesses (at least the ones that have their ears open).
Agreed. I think the most important thing this group can do (besides
videoblog)
Well, we shouldn´t approach our last nerve regarding anything on this
list, in my opinion.
People have different perspectives. Within a few simple rules, like
"Don´t just send some press release to the mailing list", I think we
should be pretty liberal.
I agree with Clint: If you don´t like t
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Troy LeMaire"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I won't flame, I appreciate the link to the other group. You could
> have been a little smoother in your delivery, but it's not like you
> cussed someone out.
Yeah, timing and tact were never my strong points.
I won't flame, I appreciate the link to the other group. You could
have been a little smoother in your delivery, but it's not like you
cussed someone out.
Jay, maybe it would be good to put up links in the "Links" section
for other Yahoo Groups that are geared toward VLogging. This is th
My (biased) .02:
By allowing a certain amount of biz talk within the group, the group
has the opportunity to help mold the future of some of the
businesses (at least the ones that have their ears open).
Otherwise it does become truly an us/them situation.
BTW there will always be some "bus
LeanBackVids.com wrote:
>
> First of all, someone already got flamed for talking about money and
> they were suggested to create the other group. Here is her related
> rant
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videobloggingbusiness/message/112
>
> And for the record, I am not concerned about
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clint Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, at this point that's unnecessary. It amazes me that people
> subscribe to high volume mailing lists but ask for people to not talk
> about certain things, expecting that only the stuff they're interested
> in
12 matches
Mail list logo
