amen to that.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a more positive note, I think that even if we are forced into a tiered
situation, it probably won't last very long. People will be angry and
demand more bandwidth. Other companies could rise to the challenge
Hi everyone:
Here's MY take on the whole issue. See my responses below
Jay dedman wrote:
On a more positive note, I think that even if we are forced into a tiered
situation, it probably won't last very long. People will be angry and
demand more bandwidth. Other companies could
Agreed. Sorry Adam but that article was garbage. No references and
pure fear mongering. As i read Jay's first post I thought about how
we've moved away from uninformed fear mongering arguments about net
neutrality. Does anyone remember the Rocketboom highway analogy
video? Anyone who's ever
It very well could be complete garbage. And at the very least, the part
about them slipping it past Canadians with little fanfare is obviously never
going to happen. But it makes sense financially. And usually corporations
like to make money.
There's also this, if that first article wasn't
Another doomsday scenario:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20330.htm
*Adam Quirk* / Wreck Salvage http://wreckandsalvage.com /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / +1 551.208.4644 (m) / imbullemhead (aim)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16,
They try this, they won't know what hit them.
I like how the article says Canada is a good test case because
Canadians are more laissez faire and less politically motivated. Not
my experience of Canada so far. They might seem laid back, but poke
them with a stick and they're like hornets.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised it got this far as well, but I still worry.they may
not be able to block traffic but I do see the day when we are paying
for what we download and I see the Verizon's, comcast, time warner,
ATT etc somehow making
