> I guess this gives you an insight into the magnitude of the 'raw
> space' we are providing and why we are so stoked about it.
> Tickets go on sale next week; there are 'bonuses' for early ticket
> purchases and in addition all people purchasing tickets before 1st of
> May will get early acce
> What do you want to do in the world of video blogging that was never
> possible before today but you could implement at this event just
> because of the scale (workshops on CC licenses and implementation of
> machine readable license metadata for one would stop a lot of
> bitching in this gr
A multi-camera shoot of something amazing produced / organized by BarCamp.
Jan
On 2/1/07, Dean Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jay dedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > As some of you may have read yesterday the reason for me
> subscribing
>
Great idea the website / wiki, Jay :)
You're Open Source to the core.
Nice.
Jan
On 2/1/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As some of you may have read yesterday the reason for me subscribing
> > to this group is that I'm on the organising commitee for
> > www.BarCampUSA.org whic
> As some of you may have read yesterday the reason for me subscribing
> to this group is that I'm on the organising commitee for
> www.BarCampUSA.org which is a 'mega' barcamp being held in Wisconsin
> in August (23rd to 26th) later this year.
> It is projected that over 5000+ people from aro
well said, mike... that is the truth of this group.
On 1/31/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to add one very simple thing. This group is whatever its
> members make it. While there are list administrators, they're extremely
> hands-off (as I believe they should be) and it
I'd like to add one very simple thing. This group is whatever its
members make it. While there are list administrators, they're extremely
hands-off (as I believe they should be) and it's largely been left to
the approximately 2,500 people on this list to manage themselves and
direct the conversat
On 1/30/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh, I think you and some others here are able to articulate specific
> arguments against contests in ways folks can understand. I'm not up to the
> task.
Ditto Josh!
> Competing against one another doesn't cut it any more - not in a commun
On 1/30/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe that contests necessarily have to be zero-sum. If
> there's adequate promotional opportunity for all participants (or at
> least those participants who have something of a quality entry) they can
> avoid being truly zero sum game
On 1/30/07, Jeffrey Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Network 2 reacted appropriately after behaving inappropriately
> The contest is fine. Not my cuppa, personally, but there's nothing
> ethically wrong with it.
> Full disclosure when it comes to marketing activity is a good thing.
> People
Josh, I think you and some others here are able to articulate specific
arguments against contests in ways folks can understand. I'm not up to the
task.
Competing against one another doesn't cut it any more - not in a community
like this. Either everyone who wants to win will win, or I want no part
> I figured out how to email through, perhaps.
> If your reply-to-email to the videoblogging group has all the html
> stuff on the side bar that Yahoo sticks on the email, such at the
> "recent activiy" side bar, colorful "sponsored links" etc, then I
> guess the email will get clogged up while
I wouldn't have a problem making a video talking about how I watch "internet
TV" I do it in a number of ways, and it has made a big impact on my life.
(Heck, I videoblogged my proposal! if that doesn't show you i like
videoblogging, I don't know what does.) my issues lie here:
- making videos for
I figured out how to email through, perhaps.
If your reply-to-email to the videoblogging group has all the html
stuff on the side bar that Yahoo sticks on the email, such at the
"recent activiy" side bar, colorful "sponsored links" etc, then I
guess the email will get clogged up while Yahoo
Steve, I actually find your input very useful, because you often enough
write what I'm too busy to find phrasing for. This group doesn't need
to become an echo chamber of constant happy agreement.
Please, keep testing us. It is the only path to truth.
Great! Notes from Steve, the self-proclaimed authority on
videoblogging (who has been talking about starting his own for over 2
years now). Lets strip out all the nonsense and get right to the
points Steve was trying to make with Jeff Pulver's offer to give away
$40 thousand dollars to a vi
Is it? Doesn't it? I'm not clever enough to follow your logical
outflanking of me. The only point I was making was that we shouldn't
be making judgements about people's 'expertise' and thereby telling
people we won't respect their opinion, based on their vlogging
productivity. A keen ob
I know it was a ;) joke, but he's really not like someone without
kids giving advice to their friends on how to raise kids...
Sorry to be a bit too earnest, but it makes me feel a bit uneasy to
see jokes about Steve's output and therefore his 'expertise' as part
of a heated argument on this
I don't believe that contests necessarily have to be zero-sum. If
there's adequate promotional opportunity for all participants (or at
least those participants who have something of a quality entry) they can
avoid being truly zero sum games.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yaho
What's wrong with contests are they are hierarchical and exclusionary but
definition, unless you structure them differently.
Give $1K to the first 40 vloggers who show plane fares bought to the
conference location and dates.
I absolutely think contests are uncool.
Popularity is not a measure of
This may be a repeat email. If this email comes first however, I may
have figured out how to streamline the yahoo group system. If not,
back to the drawing board.
I sent the below to take you up on the bitching Steve because I just
cant let you get away with it all alone ;) Im serious howeve
Network 2 reacted appropriately after behaving inappropriately.
The contest is fine. Not my cuppa, personally, but there's nothing
ethically wrong with it.
Full disclosure when it comes to marketing activity is a good thing.
People having a choice when it comes to their participation is a good
On Jan 30, 2007, at 6:39 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
> He could be right but personally I laugh at this in disbelief...
You laugh in his general direction?
Ref: Monty Python Holy Grail Scene 8
http://www.mwscomp.com/movies/grail/grail-08.htm
Ha!
That's classic.
--Steve
--
Steve Garfield
http://S
23 matches
Mail list logo
