With YouTube you can have both, centralized videos and you can post
videos on your blog.
Plus, anyone can post a YouTube video on their blog too.
They just don't allow downloads or feeds.
Millions of people don't seem to care.
On May 31, 2006, at 1:19 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
I don't much
They just don't allow downloads or feeds.Millions of people don't seem to care.
obviously. the general audience of Internet TV are not creating content or into blogging.some who create content (not nec 'works' but just random clips of anythingness) dont care about open distribution architecture
I bet there will be a lot more crossover now too, moving from amateur kids uploading clips of themselves jumping their skateboard, to maybe getting better shots, then maybe deciding to throw a plot in here and there, and eventually enjoying it so much that they want to focus more energy on
Which raises the question... how do jumpcut, eyespot and others actually do re-mixing with flash? Do they create lots of smaller clips out of your uploaded clips or is there some means in flash to clone parts of an flv?
LisaOn 5/31/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bet there will be
Save YouTube videos with KeepVid, then make the .flv file iPod ready
with iSquint.
http://keepvid.com/
via
http://www.onedigitallife.com/2006/05/13/save-youtube-videos-with-
keepvid/
http://www.isquint.org/
On May 31, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Adam Quirk wrote:
I also hate YouTube for the
Yes, but what's really frustrating is.. all that great vid, and all at
such crappy quality.
joly
Save YouTube videos with KeepVid, then make the .flv file iPod ready
with iSquint.
http://keepvid.com/
via
http://www.onedigitallife.com/2006/05/13/save-youtube-videos-with-
keepvid/
Do you mean from youtube's transcoding or the quality of original
uploaded videos... or both?
Lisa
On 5/31/06, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but what's really frustrating is.. all that great vid, and all at
such crappy quality.
joly
Save YouTube videos with KeepVid, then make
Yeah, that works and I've done it (using Sorenson Squeeze instead of iSquint since I'm on PC).I guess I should have rephrased my complaint, because the process to reuse or remix Youtube videos is unnecessarily convoluted and pisses me off to the point that I don't even bother any more.
--Adam
This is great stuff. I'm interested in seeing more conversational media tools!On 5/30/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Steve Garfield just pointed me to this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kX9A5CqZGhw
you can now leave video comments directly on another video.
so that Sexism
Hello Jay,On 5/30/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Garfield just pointed me to this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kX9A5CqZGhwyou can now leave video comments directly on another video.so that Sexism conversationwe could have right here.
i still dont like how YouTube breaks the
I don't much like the idea that YouTube tries to centralize everything on their site.
One of the things I like about vlogging and the whole Internet TV thing is that it is very decentralized without any barriers to entry or consumption.
well said.
this is alos why i dont like YouTube.
its
11 matches
Mail list logo
