Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-10 Thread Jen Simmons
640x360 is a frequently use and highly recommended 16x9 size. Your problem is that while your image is in the 16x9 shape, your video is really still 4x3 with black lines filling in the difference. You gotta set up a workflow in one way or another that *crops* off the area where the black

[videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread craigbenzine
looks to me like you need to change the settings of the player itself in blip. Perhaps make it not quite as wide? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do 16:9 video just enough to get confused every time :-) So - this video -

[videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread Heath
What did you output the video to? 480x270 or something else? Heath http://batmangeek.com http://heathparks.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do 16:9 video just enough to get confused every time :-) So - this video -

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread Brook Hinton
640x360 IS 16:9. It doesn't need to be letterboxed. It will be a widescreen frame. The additional pillarbox in this file is probably there because fitting a 16:9 frame inside a LETTERBOX inside another 16:9 frame makes it smaller on all sides. But to know EXACTLY what happened we need to know:

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread David King
ok... I used the Sanyo Xacti HD1A. The source video was 1280X720, 30 fps mp4 video. I edited in FCE, then chose export using quicktime compression, and did this: - under format, chose mpeg-4 and clicked options - chose mp4 under file format - chose h.264 under video format - did the 640x480 image

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread Brook Hinton
That would have given you a letterboxed image in a 640 x 480 frame - but I just opened the clip in quicktime and it's 640 x 360, not 640 x 480. Personally, I would export it as 640 x 360 - just as you did - but don't turn letterboxing on. That should give you a widescreen box filled with a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread David King
cool, thanks! I meant 640X360... too many numbers that look like multiplication tables! :-) David King davidleeking.com - blog davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That would have given you a letterboxed image in a 640 x 480

[videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread Heath
shoot I misread the post and didn't realize you said what size you used.to much working going on while I am trying to play.. ;D Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do 16:9 video just enough to get confused every time

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread David King
I did another test (haven't published it anywhere). This time, I did everything I mentioned below, but did NOT check the letterbox box. After exporting, the mp4 video is stretched, and has the black letterbox lines top and bottom. Is 640x360 not a standard size or something? David King

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread Rupert
If I were you, I'd export using the Export to iPod setting and see what you get. It's very good at understanding what is needed, letterboxing or not. Chances are, it'll do it right - but if not, if your video still comes out looking wrong, then it may well be that you've got the Distort

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread Rupert
Of course, I forgot that FCE limits the resolutions you can define in Sequence settings to just standard DV and HD options, doesn't it? No custom resolutions, no web-friendly options. Sigh. Another feature- rich application for web video from Apple. I'm not sure exactly what FCE offers

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 16:9 video question

2008-07-09 Thread David King
wow - my brain hurts! Seriously though, thanks... I'll check into this stuff, and see what I can figure out. That's why I love this group - a bunch of helpful cool people! David King davidleeking.com - blog davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED]