Hey Gang...
I missed the meeting but it sounds like something interesting is in the
works!
If you are in need of some graphic design work, I am always up for a
challenge.
If someone will get me the details, I will get something going.
Let me know!
All the best,
Darren Winkler
MultiMedia Group
sull wrote:
great idea, jay/jd.
maybe some kind of meter or cc type of logos for the various groupings would
be helpful too.
You mean like a graphic icon, 1-10 sliding scale, showing how
producer-friendly a site really is? That would be pretty cool. Any
graphic artists in the audience? :~)
jd
its like a 6 or 7
On 1/20/07, JD Lasica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sull wrote:
great idea, jay/jd.
maybe some kind of meter or cc type of logos for the various groupings
would
be helpful too.
You mean like a graphic icon, 1-10 sliding scale, showing how
producer-friendly a site really
Hah! So true!
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas
Haugstrup Pedersen
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:06 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Terms of Service post
Den
If it was easy to do so the TOS document would be written out
as a couple of bullet points!
I think it is a serious FAILURE of our legal/business system that a
binding document cannot be written in plain language bullet points.
At the very minimum the conscientious business provides an
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:00:14
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Terms of Service post
Its a very hard thing to boil a really large legal document into a couple
bullet points. I think jd's done a great job, its just a matter of
accounting
;
JD Lasica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu Jan 18 14:06:48 2007
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post
On 1/18/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fyi, this inaccurately describes blip's tos. Its wrong on several
points, including extremely major ones. We do not, for instance, have
I would say this problem is in part due to the fact that 'can they
sell or license your video' is worded unclearly, does a yes mean yes
to both sell and license, or just license? It would be better if that
were clearer.
I welcome warmly any guides or other things that can spread clarity
We have a wiki set up so that people can correct -- or, just as
important, add to -- this Terms of Service comparison chart.
Please have at it:
http://tools.ourmedia.org/index.php?title=TOS_comparison
If you think additional distinctions need to be drawn, as Steve
suggested, jump in and hunt
Cool I'll try to help that, but in the meantime I'll waffle about it
here in an attempt to clarify what I think might be true on these issues.
A service being allowed to sell your content is obviously a big thing,
and probably merits its own distinct question.
When it comes to licensing, it
@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu Jan 18 15:17:20 2007
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Terms of Service post
I would say this problem is in part due to the fact that 'can they
sell or license your video' is worded unclearly, does a yes mean yes
to both sell and license, or just
Den 19.01.2007 kl. 00:00 skrev Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Its a very hard thing to boil a really large legal document into a
couple bullet points. I think jd's done a great job, its just a matter
of accounting for some shades of gray.
+1
If it was easy to do so the TOS document would
ourselves and video hosting sites as to the desires of videobloggers.
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:00:14
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Terms of Service post
Its a very hard thing to boil a really
13 matches
Mail list logo
