Chuck Olsen did a documentary about it called Blogumentary, he published
it for free at least here
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8920472176280937346. Not a bad place
to startÂ… and I get a small appearence on it ;).
Miguel.
Hello,
First of all I would like to
Are there in this group any posts or links to the sources where I could
find historical events in video blogging? I tried google'ing, but the
most valuable source as I have found is - Jay Dedman's videoblogging
book, where, however, I missed history (detailed) chapter...
I would be very
For this year's VBW I will be un-vloggingwhat is un-vlogging you
ask...you will see...
Heath
http://heathparks.com/blog1
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo josh...@... wrote:
Here is the info!
VBW is in it's 6th year!
http://videobloggingweek2009.blogspot.com/
April
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, miglsd27 mig...@... wrote:
Chuck Olsen did a documentary about it called Blogumentary, he
published it for free at least here
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8920472176280937346. Not a bad
place to startÂ… and I get a small appearence on
I did a thing on history of video blogging for the Association of Internet
Researchers meeting ...
http://richardshow.org/show/vloghistory/
Also, this is a video of my power points at a presentation I did at an apple
store in chicago as one of the meet the vloggers things. It has info on the
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman jay.ded...@... wrote:
Unfortunately, reliability has been a point of contention. Some in
this group may remember the dramedy trying to write the wikipedia page
for videoblogging. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging
Newspapers/magazines
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard (Show) Hall rich...@... wrote:
I did a thing on history of video blogging for the Association of Internet
Researchers meeting ...
http://richardshow.org/show/vloghistory/
Also, this is a video of my power points at a presentation I did at an
Isn't it a bit of an oversimplification to say H.264 is universally better than
.flv? Because I've seen situations where .flv is both better quality AND
smaller file size than H.264 (using the same parameters).
For example, some of the videos I post are filmed from the back of a moving
2 or 3 years ago i made a graph here
http://www.flickr.com/photos/loiezd/2068174027/sizes/o/
For people of East Europe the Vlogeurope group is also a good history
http://www.vlogeurope.com/blog/
Have a nice day all
Loiez
well, now you also have adobe f4v using h264 codec.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:06 PM, quietleader war...@schirtzinger.comwrote:
Isn't it a bit of an oversimplification to say H.264 is universally better
than .flv? Because I've seen situations where .flv is both better quality
AND smaller
My 2 tips for promoting h264 format are:
Have it playable via a flash player embedded in the page, so users dont even
need to know its an mp4 (others have already discussed this)
Dont make the h264 file a .mov or a .m4v or a .f4v. Make it a .mp4 because this
has the widest sounding
Its both, the codec and the encoder and settings.
h264 isnt perfect, but a better h264 encoder could give a better result for
your scenario.
Likewise when Apple first started promoting h264, some people who had ben using
older mpeg4 were not blown away, because they had been using a really
great posts, mr elbows. i agree about naming files .mp4 rather than
mov or m4v.
yeah, i was very happy with 3ivx so it took me a while to get excited
about h264 for videoblogging. Looking back at my posts from 2005
recently, I saw that I seemed to get insanely low file sizes with
3ivx.
Cheers :)
Apart from how good/efficient the formats you used to use were, there are a
couple of other reasons for what you've noticed:
People were more conservative about filesizes in the past, you could force h264
to use a lower bitrate and get results that are smaller without too much loss
Aha - yes, I see.
On 31-Mar-09, at 2:05 PM, Steve Watkins wrote:
Devices that record encode in realtime will never achieve the same
quality/filesize optimisation as multi-pass encoding can. The first
pass gives the encoder information about where it can skimp on the
bitrate, hence
I haven't done this in a while: http://michaelverdi.com/h264/
Here's one video encoded at 4 different sizes bit-rate combinations.
The point is that you can make videos any size you want by limiting
the bit-rate and other parameters. H.264 is particularly nice in that
it's really efficient, i.e.
do you mean when you also turn auto keyframes on in QuickTime rather
than manual keyframes you get better and smaller using flv? Or are you
comparing auto keyframes to manual keyframes?
On 01/04/2009, at 6:06 AM, quietleader wrote:
For example, some of the videos I post are filmed from the
17 matches
Mail list logo
