st time I saw the Macintosh 128K.
It was not the first compact computer, but it was the
first elegant compact computer.
Cheers,
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com
was better to simply use blip.tv and
forget custom branding and integration and all that.
See: http://www.on2.com/developer/on2publisher/
Have fun!
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
and comments
on conference as per del.icio.us tags are easy to find via:
http://del.icio.us/tag/beyondbroadcast
Cheers,
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
then sync it up in post (easy to do in Final Cut Pro if you
record a simple clap or something that ties image to sound, like
the slates they used to use before video brought sound and image
recording into a single device). Yes, this is more work, but given
audio is half of the picture, it's some
s, but I'm
looking for some new, fresh, innovative stores of how you've managed
to get a little revenue from your video work.
Please respond to me privately and if I have people's permissions,
I'll share the case studies as well as my presentation with the list.
Thanks
ave
the time and no money, it's the way to go if getting audio away
from the camera is important.
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
617.216.1096 | http://Kino-Eye.com
Editing Aesthetics.
Cheers,
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
not inter-
cut with the HDV footage anywhere near as well as the DVX footage does.
I love the DVX/HVX look!
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
617.216.1096 | http://Kino-Eye.com
://www.artfilmtalk.com/23-marshall-herskovitz-quarterlife/
I welcome your comments on the topics he presents either here or on
Art Film Talk.
David.
David Tames | http://Kino-Eye.com | 617 216 1096
ment between
the two fields (odd and even lines temporally displaced by 1/60th
second) that make up each single frame.
I'm no fan of interlace, go progressive!
David.
David Tames | http://Kino-Eye.com | 617 216 1096
#x27;m sure Panasonic will have a follow-up to the HVX to show at NAB
this year, they really have to on the heels of XDCAM EX, the HVX is
looking long in the tooth, but it's still my favorite camera under $10K.
David.
David Tames | http://Kino-Eye.com | 617 216 1096
c on the Sanyo Xacti
> [...]
>
check these out:
Stickies:
http://www.rycote.com/products/personal_mics/stickies/
Furry Overcovers for Stickies:
http://www.rycote.com/products/personal_mics/overcovers/
Mini-Windjammers:
http://www.rycote.com/products/mini_windjammer/
-- David.
David Tames | 617.216.1096 | http://Kino-Eye.com
Various wireless manufacturers make a "brick" which is a transmitter
that plugs on to a mic via the XLR connector and turns most any mic
into a wireless mic. Some even provide the Phantom power required by
many condenser microphones.
David.
david tames | http://kino-eye.com | 61
fun
shopping, there is a growing number of HDV camcorders starting to
hover down at the $2,000 price point.
Cheers,
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
ut the HVX200:
"Taking the Panasonic HVX200 out for a spin, Part 3"
<http://kino-eye.com/2006/03/06/taking-the-panasonic-hvx200-out-for-a-
spin-part-3/>
"To P2 or not P2, that is the question…"
<http://kino-eye.com/2006/04/30/to-p2-or-not-to-p2/>
It's so fun
WWWhatsup wrote:
> What's the difference between FX1 and FX7?
The differences are basically the sensors and the lens, the FX7 is
smaller and has a longer lens, but sports smaller chips, with
slightly inferior low-light performance. A feature of the FX7 is the
ability to shoot digital stills
then, access to the tools of production is only 1/3 of the equation.
You still need access to marketing to build an audience, and access
to distribution. The internet today provides the missing pieces, it
fuels word-of-mouth as well as provides an economical distribution
medium.
David.
Robert et al., write in favor of shooting HD and I'll concur.
Here's my summary of reasons for my own preference to shooting HD,
even when the "deliverable" is 320x240 iPod or web video.
1. Shooting in an HD format like HDV is more "future-proof" that SD
DV. If you edit using a editor that al
Final Cut Pro and I find the performance
to be pretty good, in fact, better than having Compressor running in
the background all on the same OS!
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
uestion.
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
a forum of exchange should allow all
points of view. What difference does it make?
David.
david tames | http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
21 matches
Mail list logo
