Hello,
The biggest build size that exists now (the --with-features) is 'huge'.
This 'huge' still does not include interpreters.
What does public and Bram think about adding another build size
('extra-huge') that includes [all] interpreters ?
What is your feeback ?
Yakov
Possible namings:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
Hello,
The biggest build size that exists now (the --with-features) is 'huge'.
This 'huge' still does not include interpreters.
What does public and Bram think about adding another build size
('extra-huge') that includes [all] interpreters ?
What is your feeback ?
Yakov
I believe I may have found an obscure bug. It is not a harmful bug. It
does not make VIM crash or do weird things. (Well, sort-of.) :-)
Here is how to reproduce it:
First you have to have a lot of open and close braces (}). They
do not have to be on the same line and in fact,
On 9/8/06, Mark Manning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe I may have found an obscure bug. It is not a harmful bug. It
does not make VIM crash or do weird things. (Well, sort-of.) :-)
Here is how to reproduce it:
First you have to have a lot of open and close braces (}). They
do
Mark Manning wrote:
First you have to have a lot of open and close braces (}).
..snip..
Ok. So the problem happens when you delete sub b and then hit the
dd key to delete the blank line between sub a's ending close brace
and where sub b's starting line was. When you do this VIM
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 at 5:19pm, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 at 9:50pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
I wrote:
Patch 7.0.082
Problem:Calling a function that waits for input may cause List
and
Dictionary arguments to be
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
Hmm, now that I think of it you could get problems with a command like
this:
:echo [1, 2, 3, ..., 2000]
If you get the more prompt the garbage collector might delete the list
before it's completely echoed. I'll look into that.
This is probably
Bill McCarthy wrote:
To better understand what vimdiff is doing (and why it is so
slow), I had my shell (4NT under WinXP) keep a log showing
me just what was requested. [Note: I use '!' instead of ''
for redirection because my 4NT is set to not overwrite
existing files unless explicitly
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 at 11:11pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
Hmm, now that I think of it you could get problems with a command like
this:
:echo [1, 2, 3, ..., 2000]
If you get the more prompt the garbage collector might delete the
list
