Re: Debugging errorformat strings

2006-11-30 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 11/30/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 11/29/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was originally posted to vim@vim.org but I've not had a reply. Maybe it's better posted here, anyway. This is the concise form of the

Re: Debugging errorformat strings

2006-11-30 Thread Hugh Sasse
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 11/30/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 11/29/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was originally posted to vim@vim.org but I've not had a reply. Maybe it's better posted

Re: Debugging errorformat strings

2006-11-30 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 11/30/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was definitely getting this and it was pasted. Pulling the old versions of the generator script out of RCS I cannot regenerate this message. Using old versions of the makefile doesn't help restore this. Yeah, I remember getting these

Re: Debugging errorformat strings

2006-11-30 Thread Hugh Sasse
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 11/30/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was definitely getting this and it was pasted. Pulling the old versions of the generator script out of RCS I cannot regenerate this message. Using old versions of the makefile doesn't help

RE: Debugging errorformat strings

2006-11-29 Thread Eggum, DavidX S
', David -Original Message- From: Hugh Sasse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 2:49 AM To: vim developers list Subject: Debugging errorformat strings This was originally posted to vim@vim.org but I've not had a reply. Maybe it's better posted here, anyway

RE: Debugging errorformat strings

2006-11-29 Thread Hugh Sasse
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Eggum, DavidX S wrote: Hugh, Vim will use the first matching pattern in your efm, so put the more specific patterns at the beginning, the more general patterns at the end. So try putting the new lines at the front of the efm: OK, so how does that interact with