Jonathan Smith wrote:
> I know this is sortof late notice, but it would be great if this could
> go in 7.1 final :)
>
> > The empty comment is still there. Just leave that line blank. No
> > biggie, of course, just aesthetics.
>
> i could have sworn i fixed it. this time, though, it really is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know this is sortof late notice, but it would be great if this could go in 7.1
final :)
> The empty comment is still there. Just leave that line blank. No
> biggie, of course, just aesthetics.
i could have sworn i fixed it. this time, though, it
Jonathan Smith wrote:
> sorry for the long time between replies. i've been busy on other things :)
>
> Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> > Well, the rpm spec file-type has been with us a long time, well before
> > we knew better. Try to give your file-type an as specific name as
> > possible. You wi
It's getting there.
On 4/26/07, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> A better way of doing this is to do (substitute \w with whatever
> pattern your parser actually allows)
>
> syn match conaryUse
> \ "Use\.\w\+"
> \ nextgroup=conaryUseFlag
Oops. That s
sorry for the long time between replies. i've been busy on other things :)
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> Well, the rpm spec file-type has been with us a long time, well before
> we knew better. Try to give your file-type an as specific name as
> possible. You will not be getting the name "recipe"; i
On 4/22/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> What I meant was that Bram mentioned that he uses Ctrl+N to complete
> names in emails to make sure he doesn't misspell people's names. In
> his response to Jonathan's mail he wrote Nikola (note the missing 'i'
>
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/21/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Getting better. Nikola's comments also apply (thanks Nikola!).
>
> No problem. I guess there's a bug in the current Ctrl+N
> implemen
On 4/21/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Getting better. Nikola's comments also apply (thanks Nikola!).
>
> No problem. I guess there's a bug in the current Ctrl+N
> implementation? It seems to be
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>> On 4/20/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Getting better. Nikola's comments also apply (thanks Nikola!).
>>
>> No problem. I guess there's a bug in the current Ctrl+N
>> implementation? It seems to be cutting off the last chara
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/20/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Getting better. Nikola's comments also apply (thanks Nikola!).
No problem. I guess there's a bug in the current Ctrl+N
implementation? It seems to be cutting off the last character in the
completion. ;-)
nikola
On 4/20/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Getting better. Nikola's comments also apply (thanks Nikola!).
No problem. I guess there's a bug in the current Ctrl+N
implementation? It seems to be cutting off the last character in the
completion. ;-)
nikolai
Jonathan Smith wrote:
> >> Conary [1] has a file format called a "recipe" [2] which is in many
> >> ways similar in function to a spec file or an ebuild. rPath has been
> >> maintaining a syntax highlighting file for this format, but it would
> >> be nice if vim would accept a patch to include th
On 4/19/07, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> "recipe" is not a good filetype name. Is there anything against using
> "conary"?
Well, the files are called recipes. In the same way that you wouldn't call a
spec file "rpm", you wouldn't call a recipe "conary"
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Jonathan Smith wrote:
Conary [1] has a file format called a "recipe" [2] which is in many
ways similar in function to a spec file or an ebuild. rPath has been
maintaining a syntax highlighting file for this format, but it would
be nice if vim would accept a patch to includ
Jonathan Smith wrote:
> Conary [1] has a file format called a "recipe" [2] which is in many
> ways similar in function to a spec file or an ebuild. rPath has been
> maintaining a syntax highlighting file for this format, but it would
> be nice if vim would accept a patch to include this in the st
15 matches
Mail list logo
