Hello,
I would appreciate if someone could help me to resolve this problem.
I have installed vim-latex from the OpenSuSE distribution. Most of its
features work correctly. \ll will start latex translation, and \lv
launches the viewer. However, \ls , instead of launching the forward
search, do
t;
I use latexmk for compilation and you have to set "-synctex=1"
somewhere in the compile rules.
Also, did you try to use the latest vim-latex from the git repository?
I dont know which version is in the OpenSUSE repositories but okular
forward search is working with the latest vim-latex versio
ion is the same if I source
the files you sent in the previous post. Not sure if I am not doing
something wrong...
With best regards,
Filip
On Thu, 17 May 2012, Peter Vasil wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Filip Kadlec wrote:
Peter,
thanks for your
x27;
let g:Tex_CompileRule_pdf = 'pdflatex --synctex=1 -interaction=nonstopmode $*'
and have a ...synctex.gz (this is the file with all information needed
for forward searching) file in your project folder after compiling the
document,
I have no clue why forward search would not work.
I use Oku
Hello Bernhard,
I don't have a solution to your problem, just want to note that in my
case "u" undoes the whole word (or typing sequence) straight, no
letter-by-letter behavior occurs. My version of vim is 7.3, too. This
works regardless of whether the latex suite is loaded.
Hope this helps, Fi
Hello everyone,
after a distribution upgrade, my vim-latex still works as before, but I
have noticed that in the .tex files, the foldcolumn does not appear
although the folds exist. Previously, I did not modify my personal
settings for folds since everything worked normally. I have tried to l
disappeared
== Auszüge aus der Nachricht von Filip Kadlec vom 2014-12-19 09:56:
Hello everyone,
after a distribution upgrade, my vim-latex still works as before, but I
have noticed that in the .tex files, the foldcolumn does not appear
although the folds exist. Previously, I did not modify my personal
Dear all,
after a distribution upgrade, I am experiencing a strange problem with
the forward search. I use pdflatex and pdf target format for both
compiling and viewing. When I input \lv , Okular with the pdf file is
activated. (By the way, Okular 0.21 now supports document tabbing, and
each
Hello,
unfortunately, I don't have a solution to your problem, I just can state
that smart quotes work in my vim-latex installation. After hitting "
twice, I get ``''<++> as expected. Rather than vim-version, I think it is
a matter of version of the vim-latex suite; mine comes from the OpenSuSE
1
Hi PierrO,
I had a similar problem with .tex files some time ago. The behavior has
much improved when I added to my .vimrc these lines:
set spell linebreak
syntax spell toplevel
Since then, spelling stops working only exceptionally in some longer files
with several hundred lines, and this ma
Hi, Gerd,
I second Laszlo's point of view; for me, using labels with well chosen
names is clearly the best choice, and I think that the latex-suite should
keep this behavior by default. To me, the -completion works quite well
and it would maybe need some improvements (it does not work for me wit
lity would stay as before.
Filip
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017, Gerd Wachsmuth wrote:
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:42:28
From: Gerd Wachsmuth
To: Filip Kadlec ,
"vim-latex-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Aux completion
Thank you for your comments.
I think I wa
Hello all,
since years, I have been using successfully the LaTeX suite under OpenSUSE
Linux. Having configured the compilation to pdf format, it has always
worked straightforwardly. Since recently, however, I have problems with
the multiple compilation feature, described in part 6.3 of :h
lat
_CompileRule_pdf variable.
Are you quite sure that it should read "--synctex=1" and not "-synctex=1" ?
(Two dashes versus one?)
Best regards, Mirko
Am Freitag, den 19.02.2021, 16:56 +0100 schrieb Filip Kadlec:
Hello all,
since years, I have been using successfully the LaTeX su
file, this presumably
won't change the number of lines of either of those files.
In that way, the multiple compile function is not adapted to bibliography
styles which number references by the order of first appearance.
You could check what happens when you add a new citation to your tex file.
15 matches
Mail list logo
