Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Thomas Köhler
Hello Thilo, Thilo Six wrote: Hello Thomas and Benjamin, Excerpt from Thomas Köhler: -- snip -- I think you're misinterpreting what team maintenance would mean. It wouldn't be a team per language, but rather a single team to handle changes (maintenance) to all syntax files. (Which

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Benjamin R. Haskell
On Tue, 15 May 2012, Ernie Rael wrote: On 5/15/2012 9:02 AM, Thilo Six wrote: No one is anyone blocking to take care of their peeve pets. I'd be hesitant to suggest that people take care of their pet peeves. Yes for real bugs or infrastructure features (like spell). But since there is

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 1:14:00 AM UTC-5, Thomas Köhler wrote: OK, now things are clearer for me. That's basically a good idea, but: - URL would also need to change: http://gott-gehabt.de/800_wer_wir_sind/thomas/Homepage/Computer/vim/syntax/uil.vim would need to become something

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 1:32:31 AM UTC-5, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2012, Ernie Rael wrote: On 5/15/2012 9:02 AM, Thilo Six wrote: No one is anyone blocking to take care of their peeve pets. I'd be hesitant to suggest that people take care of their pet peeves. Yes

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Hello Ernie, Excerpt from Ernie Rael: -- snip -- But since there is hopefully a main guy for each file, shouldn't random changes be kept to a minimum? Well i can only speak for myself. Usually i very hardly try to be friendly. That means the workflow of asking the maintainer for a change

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Hi Thomas and Ben, Excerpt from Ben Fritz: On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 1:14:00 AM UTC-5, Thomas Köhler wrote: OK, now things are clearer for me. That's basically a good idea, but: - URL would also need to change:

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Ingo Karkat
On 16-May-2012 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT), Ben Fritz wrote: Or, how about just a clone of the main Vim repository? Often runtime file changes are related to changes in the Vim code. Often? Vim has superb backward compatibility, and the thing that started this thread is adding @Spell support,

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Dominique Pellé
Ingo Karkat sw...@ingo-karkat.de wrote: I would like to see runtime files treated the same way as all other Vim sources. Right now, no patches are published, and Bram just occasionally commits them to the repo. Aren't you using Mercurial? Runtime files are now updated quite often in

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Ingo Karkat
On 16-May-2012 21:42, Dominique Pellé wrote: Ingo Karkat sw...@ingo-karkat.de wrote: I would like to see runtime files treated the same way as all other Vim sources. Right now, no patches are published, and Bram just occasionally commits them to the repo. Aren't you using Mercurial?

Rendering glitches on FreeBSD

2012-05-16 Fir de Conversatie Mikkel H
I've recently switched to running Vim on the CLI on a FreeBSD box via SSH, but after switching, I'm seeing strange rendering glitches – disappearing status lines, text appearing outside its bounding box when using splits, etc. I have tried recompiling Vim with different options, disabling all