On Tue, 15 May 2012, Ernie Rael wrote:
On 5/15/2012 9:02 AM, Thilo Six wrote:
No one is anyone blocking to take care of their peeve pets.
I'd be hesitant to suggest that people "take care of their pet
peeves". Yes for real bugs or "infrastructure" features (like spell).
But since there is hopefully a main guy for each file, shouldn't
random changes be kept to a minimum?
I took "pet peeves" to mean minor bugs that are annoying on a daily
basis, not random features. Personally, I think "random" (as in, minor)
changes should be maximized. The more items that go directly from bug
report to fixes in a short amount of time, the more pleasant it is to
use Vim.
--
Best,
Ben
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
