Re: Behaviour of :normal in operator-pending mode is not defined

2013-03-07 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 4:43:56 PM UTC-6, glts wrote: While investigating an item on the todo list, I found out that the behaviour of :normal[!] in operator-pending mode is not well-defined: it is not documented and is not taken special care of in the source. Consider the

Re: Behaviour of :normal in operator-pending mode is not defined

2013-03-07 Fir de Conversatie glts
I see. I was thinking about it the wrong way then. On Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:35:24 PM UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote: gUe suMMER :norm! gUeCR suMMER gU:norm! eCR suMMEr I'm not sure if this is documented (I couldn't find it

Re: Behaviour of :normal in operator-pending mode is not defined

2013-03-07 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
David Bürgin wrote: I see. I was thinking about it the wrong way then. On Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:35:24 PM UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote: gUe suMMER :norm! gUeCR suMMER gU:norm! eCR suMMEr I'm not sure if this is

Behaviour of :normal in operator-pending mode is not defined

2013-03-06 Fir de Conversatie glts
While investigating an item on the todo list, I found out that the behaviour of :normal[!] in operator-pending mode is not well-defined: it is not documented and is not taken special care of in the source. Consider the following text with the cursor on the first m: summer ^ Then