On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 22:38, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
Compiled and installed fine on Ubuntu 8.04 with GTK2.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all:
pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files
gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition 4.10..A French):
I have an alert box Program start error:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Christian MICHON
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
this is the exact reason why I started using git and dropped cvs/svn...
now that you're putting the focus on releasing a collection of files
and not tracking them individually so much anymore (you're tracking a
Hi Vimmers,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Vim 7.2a is also available from CVS (as soon as it finishes uploading).
Subversion will follow later.
http://www.vim.org/cvs.php
http://www.vim.org/subversion.php
The 7.2a BETA is
Hi,
Solaris 9 + SunStudio 12 seems to work fine. Just single nit:
./configure says
checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check
I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on:
[...]
Oh, didn't know that there's make test :)
When I run it, I can see
== make test ===
make[2]: Leaving directory `/share/chroot/on81/tmp/vim72a/src'
if test -n
On Jun 24 18:18, Gary Johnson wrote:
Ditto. I just finished installing it and successfully running make
test on
Cygwin on Windows XP
Out of curiosity: Which Cygwin version are you running? 1.5.25?
`make test' also builds and runs fine in a test release of the upcoming
new major
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote:
I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on:
[...]
Oh, didn't know that there's make test :)
When I run it, I can see
== make test
===
make[2]: Leaving
I wrote:
There is something wrong with what CVS did to the files. Especially in
runtime/tutor. Might take a day to sort out.
Sigh. Why can't I just tell CVS that this is the tree of files I want
to have in the repository?
Well, it appears that CVS has all the files now, so you can use
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 25/06/08 02:00, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
There is something wrong with what CVS did to the files. Especially in
runtime/tutor. Might take a day to sort out.
Sigh. Why can't I just tell CVS that this is the tree of files I want
to have in the repository?
Christian -
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is something wrong with what CVS did to the files. Especially in
runtime/tutor. Might take a day to sort out.
Sigh. Why can't I just tell CVS that this is the tree of files I want
to
== make test
===
make[2]: Leaving directory `/share/chroot/on81/tmp/vim72a/src'
if test -n -a -f po/Makefile; then \
cd po; make -f Makefile check VIM=../vim; \
fi
if test vim != vim -a ! -e
There is something wrong with what CVS did to the files. Especially in
runtime/tutor. Might take a day to sort out.
Sigh. Why can't I just tell CVS that this is the tree of files I want
to have in the repository?
The .tar.bz2 / .tar.gz on the Vim FTP site aren't afflicted
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding another system won't solve the CVS problems. Can't just drop CVS
right now, many people are using it.
I would not add it. I would use it to replace them all (I'm too
supportive with git, I know...)
using CVS
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but
it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this:
brains hgs 29 % rcsdiff -u !$
rcsdiff -u Makefile
===
RCS file: Makefile,v
retrieving revision
Hi all,
I've found count$ very useful when ediin not-so properly formatted text
(e.g. paragraphs ending just visually, with no logical separator like a blank
line). However, the opposite - count0 doesn't work.
The first idea can be - of course - that the problem is that vim can't know if
the
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but
it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this:
Ah, I never said that the test fails, but looking at my previous message
I have to admit that it sounds so.
[...]
I can't find a GNU autoconf macro to test
Hi all,
something that has irritated me for ages, but which I never thought
about in this way, is the fact that when you start vim on a console,
vim detects a X server running, vim tries to connect, but can't as it
misses the magic cookie, the error messages are spewed into the
buffer and do not
and if you use vim -X ?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Richard Hartmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
something that has irritated me for ages, but which I never thought
about in this way, is the fact that when you start vim on a console,
vim detects a X server running, vim tries to
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote:
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but
it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this:
Ah, I never said that the test fails, but looking at my previous message
I have to admit that it sounds so.
Rhialto wrote:
On Mon 23 Jun 2008 at 16:14:51 -0400, James Vega wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:47:15PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
But the current Bourne shell *is* a POSIX shell.
You're thinking of the Bourne-Again SHell (aka bash). I'm referring to
the actual Bourne shell, which isn't
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote:
[...]
Makefiles are not generated, as you noted.
[...]
By the way, which version of Solaris are you on? Just wondering how
long this will persist.
Solaris 9 and also latest development. It will persist, noone dares to
touch
On 2008-06-25, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24 18:18, Gary Johnson wrote:
Ditto. I just finished installing it and successfully running make
test on
Cygwin on Windows XP
Out of curiosity: Which Cygwin version are you running? 1.5.25?
$ uname -a
On 24-Jun-08 12:07, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Ingo Karkat wrote:
On 20-Jun-08 18:34, Ingo Karkat wrote:
On 20-Jun-08 17:59, Ben Fritz wrote:
I have a script that creates files like this:
file.ext - file.ext.ann_out.ext
I don't want to see these files when I do filename completion, because
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:45:04PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Adding another system won't solve the CVS problems. Can't just drop
CVS right now, many people are using it.
If you use your favourite version control system, there should be ways
to automatically create the CVS repository from
Christian Michon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding another system won't solve the CVS problems. Can't just drop CVS
right now, many people are using it.
I would not add it. I would use it to replace them all (I'm too
supportive
Patrick Texier wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all:
pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files
gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition 4.10..A French):
I have an alert box
Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you,
especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix.
Well, I thought that single letter change would not require diff, but
I'm happy to attach one :)
Thanks
--
Vlad
--- Makefile.orig st črn
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding another system won't solve the CVS problems. Can't just drop CVS
right now, many people are using it.
I would not add it. I would use it to
On 25/06/2008 17:14, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Michon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding another system won't solve the CVS problems. Can't just drop CVS
right now, many people are using it.
I would not add it. I would use it
On 25/06/08 13:48, Hugh Sasse wrote:
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but
it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this:
brains hgs 29 % rcsdiff -u !$
rcsdiff -u Makefile
===
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:54:36PM +0100, Mike Williams wrote:
Can someone use Git without installing any software? If yes, then we
might be able to replace other methods. If no, then lots of people will
prefer to stay with what they already have installed.
Windows users wanting to use
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote:
Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you,
especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix.
Well, I thought that single letter change would not require diff, but
I'm happy to
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:25:00PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote:
Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you,
especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix.
Well, I thought that
Dnia Wednesday 25 of June 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
Hello Vim users,
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
Compiles, Tests ALL DONE, runs fine on Mandriva 2008.0, GTK2, Huge.
m.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev
Thanks for Vim-7.2a-beta, so far it looks good. I ran the spelling
checker on the help files vim7/runtime/doc/*txt of Vim-7.2a-beta,
and found a few minor typos. I attach the patch.
-- Dominique
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev
I wrote:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 25/06/08 02:00, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
There is something wrong with what CVS did to the files. Especially in
runtime/tutor. Might take a day to sort out.
Sigh. Why can't I just tell CVS that this is the tree of files I want
to have in
Ingo Karkat wrote:
On 24-Jun-08 12:07, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Ingo Karkat wrote:
On 20-Jun-08 18:34, Ingo Karkat wrote:
On 20-Jun-08 17:59, Ben Fritz wrote:
I have a script that creates files like this:
file.ext - file.ext.ann_out.ext
I don't want to see these files when I
John Beckett wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on:
- Windows XP
- Fedora 8 Linux
test11.in has:
Note: This test will fail if gzip is not available.
test30.in perhaps should
Vladimir Marek wrote:
Solaris 9 + SunStudio 12 seems to work fine. Just single nit:
./configure says
checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
I found a documentation error in Vim72a, see attachment. (I think it
also applies to Vim 7.1, but there it's not as important since
floating-point is not part of the standard sources.)
Actually, that isn't right either. It should read:
When a
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 25 12:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 24 18:18, Gary Johnson wrote:
Ditto. I just finished installing it and successfully running make
test on
Cygwin on Windows XP
Out of curiosity: Which Cygwin version are you running? 1.5.25?
Richard Hartmann wrote:
something that has irritated me for ages, but which I never thought
about in this way, is the fact that when you start vim on a console,
vim detects a X server running, vim tries to connect, but can't as it
misses the magic cookie, the error messages are spewed into
Christian Michon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone use Git without installing any software? If yes, then we
might be able to replace other methods. If no, then lots of people will
prefer to stay with what they already have
2008/6/25 Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Patrick Texier wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all:
pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files
gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:05:04AM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
you'll get a tar.gz matching a particular commit or a tag (yellow
boxes, useful to track releases/milestones), or even experimental
branches (in green) without ever had to install git, it even works
with internet explorer...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:05:04AM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Can someone use Git without installing any software? If yes, then we
might be able to replace other methods. If no, then lots of people will
prefer to stay with what they already have installed.
you can get snapshots without
Gautam Iyer wrote:
You can wget individual patches from git.
For example:
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel.
git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=0deedbcc98a831284f6e9db2510e88e90e01c
286;hp=5dd06d08015cf9c0721f34f7005ecd670025c334
I use the FTP server to get patches
Hello, Vimmers.
I found a bug in getbufvar(). With {varname} == , it returns
the dictionary of variables which are local to the current buffer
instead of the buffer specified by {expr}. It should return the
dictionary for the latter buffer.
I wrote a patch to fix this bug. See the attached
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Bill McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 25-Jun-08 2:05am -0600, Edward L. Fox wrote:
[...]
svn co
https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/vim7.2/
In the top level of your checking-out directory to switch to 7.2
branch.
Note:
Dominique Pelle wrote:
Thanks for Vim-7.2a-beta, so far it looks good. I ran the
spelling checker on the help files vim7/runtime/doc/*txt of
Vim-7.2a-beta, and found a few minor typos. I attach the patch.
I just did a similar check and found a couple more (I missed several of yours!).
Put
51 matches
Mail list logo
