-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/04/2012 06:56, Paul Isambert wrote:
On 12/04/2012 06:17, Paul Isambert wrote:
Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com a écrit:
On 10/04/2012 22:01, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2012-04-10 18:37 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Putting the documents
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/2012 06:17, Paul Isambert wrote:
Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com a écrit:
On 10/04/2012 22:01, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2012-04-10 18:37 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Putting the documents (manual reference) into tex I think
is the
Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com a écrit:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/2012 06:17, Paul Isambert wrote:
Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com a écrit:
On 10/04/2012 22:01, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2012-04-10 18:37 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Putting the
On 2012-04-10 16:54 -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 16:30, Andre Majorel aym-...@teaser.fr wrote:
http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/vimpspp/
is that what was used to create this: http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/
No. Those are typeset in Courier.
--
André Majorel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2012 22:01, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2012-04-10 18:37 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Putting the documents (manual reference) into tex I think is
the best way to go will result in a much better looking final
PDF from which to print.
Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com a écrit:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2012 22:01, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2012-04-10 18:37 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Putting the documents (manual reference) into tex I think is
the best way to go will result in a much
On 2012-04-05 22:32 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
There doesn't seem to have been much of a positive response however to
the idea in general so taking that into account if the vim list is
ambivalent towards it, I'm not so sure it'll pan out with anyone else.
It wouldn't take an Everest type
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2012 16:59, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2012-04-05 22:32 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
There doesn't seem to have been much of a positive response however to
the idea in general so taking that into account if the vim list is
ambivalent towards
I think beautifying vimdoc would be a good thing (though I don't really dig
the dead tree version). I think maybe even expanding it so that it's more
book like (maybe with examples from the list / web) might even be a good
thing.
I think a starting point would be to decide on a document format
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2012 18:12, shawn wilson wrote:
I think beautifying vimdoc would be a good thing (though I don't really
dig the dead tree version). I think maybe even expanding it so that it's
more book like (maybe with examples from the list / web)
On 2012-04-10 17:36 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
I'm still very keen on the idea however so if you want maybe we can pool
resources (along with anybody else of course)?
Sure. Here's what I have :
http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/vimpspp/
--
André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 16:30, Andre Majorel aym-...@teaser.fr wrote:
Sure. Here's what I have :
http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/vimpspp/
is that what was used to create this: http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your
On 2012-04-10 18:37 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Putting the documents (manual reference) into tex I think is the best
way to go will result in a much better looking final PDF from which to
print.
What do you have in mind ?
If you just put all the text in a giant monospace verbatim, it
won't
In this respect Emacs wins. They have a much more beautifully rendered PDF
manual. In comparison, vim manual in PDF look amateurish.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/emacs.pdf
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
On 5 April 2012 22:17, Sujith Abraham milkyway8...@gmail.com wrote:
In this respect Emacs wins. They have a much more beautifully rendered PDF
manual. In comparison, vim manual in PDF look amateurish.
The Emacs manual is written as a book and typeset with TeX (TexInfo).
Vim manual is just an
Phil Dobbin wrote:
I downloaded a jolly good pdf of the Vim :help manual:
http://www.eandem.co.uk/mrw/vim/usr_doc/index.html
the other day the thought struck me that, to my knowledge, no hardcopy
of same is in existence.
Has this idea ever been mooted? In my opinion, it would be
16 matches
Mail list logo
