Hi Herman,
I'd love to have time for this, but don't think that I'll have time in the
next two months. If you have time, please take over.
It would be kind, if you could discuss your ideas before implementing
anything. For me it's important to have a sane upstream for Debian packaging
of scrip
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Marc Weber wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:42:01PM -0700, Herman Radtke wrote:
>> The wiki page Thomas setup hasn't been touched in about 4 months. Are
>> the requirements still being discussed?
>
>> Herman Radtke
>
> Hi Herman Radtke,
>
> If you haven't se
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:42:01PM -0700, Herman Radtke wrote:
> The wiki page Thomas setup hasn't been touched in about 4 months. Are
> the requirements still being discussed?
> Herman Radtke
Hi Herman Radtke,
If you haven't seen the goals of tovl yet may I invite you to get to
know about the
The wiki page Thomas setup hasn't been touched in about 4 months. Are
the requirements still being discussed?
I would hate to see this project die out and am willing to donate my
time and LAMP skills to make sure it doesn't. If the original
proposal was too big, then let's break it down into sm
Ok, well good luck on your vim website.
Thanks for all the fish!
- Joseph
On Dec 9, 5:05 am, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gorilla3D (sutabi?) wrote:
> > Just wondering if anyone is actively working on this. If not I'll be
> > more then happy to join the effort, in programming this
Gorilla3D (sutabi?) wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone is actively working on this. If not I'll be
> more then happy to join the effort, in programming this. I use vim
> everyday and although I cant help the scripts that make vim so amazing
> I can atleast help the site.
>
> If your interested
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 03:27, Gorilla3D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone is actively working on this. If not I'll be
> more then happy to join the effort, in programming this. I use vim
> everyday and although I cant help the scripts that make vim so amazing
> I can atleast
Just wondering if anyone is actively working on this. If not I'll be
more then happy to join the effort, in programming this. I use vim
everyday and although I cant help the scripts that make vim so amazing
I can atleast help the site.
If your interested in some of my work http://gorilla3d.com/p
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:01, Caleb Cushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> so... how is it we are going to determine what of, if any of this happens?
IMO, an endorsement by Bram.
Richard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist
> As I said before, IMHO some BBS/forum system would solve most of the
> current short-comings.
Yeah but I'm thinking something a bit more embedded and closer to what
you see on mozilla's addon site. Except more threaded.
--
Caleb Cushing
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
> bug tracking: anyone else think that a threaded comment system with
> attachments might be enough of a bug tracker for /scripts?
As I said before, IMHO some BBS/forum system would solve most of the
current short-comings.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
bug tracking: anyone else think that a threaded comment system with
attachments might be enough of a bug tracker for /scripts? thing I'm
thinking is that there are so many thousands of scripts that most
users don't want to have to look for which one on a centralized
tracker. so a 'mini' tracker (m
Am Friday 07 November 2008 10:01:40 schrieb Caleb Cushing:
> so... how is it we are going to determine what of, if any of this happens?
I wanted to wait this weekend to give anybody time to add comments to
the wiki page( http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Vim.org_relaunch ).
If the requirements / wish lis
so... how is it we are going to determine what of, if any of this happens?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 06:36, Caleb Cushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, and if you ask me the entire site, not just scripts, needs
> work. I suggested drupal but if anyone has other suggestions I'm open.
That is what I meant, yes. As to which CMS, I am not qualified to
venture a guess.
> Rebuilding the site from the ground up based on some CMS would also
> be an option. Less work on the code site, more time for actual content.
>
Right, and if you ask me the entire site, not just scripts, needs
work. I suggested drupal but if anyone has other suggestions I'm open.
> >> * add
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 15:56, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My personal preference is not to get interrupted by "new thing
> available" messages. They mostly distract me from what I was actually
> doing. Typing some command to check for updates is usually more
> convenient. And a
> > And as others noted: this already exists. :help getscript.
>
> My suggestion add an rss/atom feed
I personally would prefer a BBS type of forum. Mozilla[1] and other
communities use forums to announce updates for plugins, user support
etc.
getscript didn't really work for me the last time
Am Tuesday 04 November 2008 09:50:26 schrieb Caleb Cushing:
> > My personal preference is not to get interrupted by "new thing
> > available" messages. They mostly distract me from what I was actually
> > doing. Typing some command to check for updates is usually more
> > convenient. And as
> My personal preference is not to get interrupted by "new thing
> available" messages. They mostly distract me from what I was actually
> doing. Typing some command to check for updates is usually more
> convenient. And as others noted: this already exists. :help getscript.
I think this d
Thomas Koch wrote:
> by revising my .vim dir and creating a list of usefull vim scripts for
> my collegues, I started thinking about vim.org/scripts. Let me assume,
> that the many high quality scripts are a very important part of vim,
> which makes vim the almighty tool you use every day.
>
>
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 18:02, Thomas Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So who is the current responsible behind vim.org and who would
> like to join the team?
Bram is, but he is on holidays, atm.
Richard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the
2008/10/26, Thomas Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> there is a vimonline development site[1] on sourceforge. The bugtracker
> there states, that the last time an issue was closed was at 2007-07-30
> and the oldest open issue is from 2001-09-13.
> Isn't it, that vim.org needs and deserves more
Hi,
there is a vimonline development site[1] on sourceforge. The bugtracker
there states, that the last time an issue was closed was at 2007-07-30
and the oldest open issue is from 2001-09-13.
Isn't it, that vim.org needs and deserves more attention to reflect the
greatness of VIM? Since I'm a we
On 10/22/08, Thomas Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> by revising my .vim dir and creating a list of usefull vim scripts for
> my collegues, I started thinking about vim.org/scripts. Let me assume,
> that the many high quality scripts are a very important part of vim,
> which makes
> Debian want you to use apt to update vim scripts and I
> consider this a good thing.
On reddit there was this reference to (eek)
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/10/from_Vim_to_Emacs_-_part_1/
and from there to
http://packages.debian.org/sid/vim-addon-manager
Don't know if that's of any
On 22/10/08 21:23, François Beaubert wrote:
> just remember that there is
>
> getscript.vba.gz from Dr Chip
>
> see it at http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#VimFuncs
... which is now distributed with recent versions of Vim, as
$VIMRUNTIME/plugin/getscriptPlugin.vim,
$VIMRUNTIME/
François Beaubert wrote:
> Great idea !!!
>
> I've see something in this spirit, have a look at:
>
> http://vimpi.net/
>
> But may I add another idea to your post: why not integrate a plugins
> manager directly within vim to show you the plugins which could be
> upgradeable or downloadable, etc
>
oop's I'm too late
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
just remember that there is
getscript.vba.gz from Dr Chip
see it at http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#VimFuncs
2008/10/22 François Beaubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> But even if vimball could update your scripts, it wouldn't be the best
>> solution.
>
> why ... don't know that vi
> But even if vimball could update your scripts, it wouldn't be the best
> solution.
why ... don't know that vimball could be used to update script
>Debian want you to use apt to update vim scripts and I
> consider this a good thing. So to make everybody happy, we need a good
> upstream and so e
Hi François,
there already is a plugin manager in vim: vimball. It does not support
automatic updating yet.
But even if vimball could update your scripts, it wouldn't be the best
solution. Debian want you to use apt to update vim scripts and I
consider this a good thing. So to make everybody hap
Great idea !!!
I've see something in this spirit, have a look at:
http://vimpi.net/
But may I add another idea to your post: why not integrate a plugins
manager directly within vim to show you the plugins which could be
upgradeable or downloadable, etc
2008/10/22 Thomas Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
by revising my .vim dir and creating a list of usefull vim scripts for
my collegues, I started thinking about vim.org/scripts. Let me assume,
that the many high quality scripts are a very important part of vim,
which makes vim the almighty tool you use every day.
Then the quality of vim in a
34 matches
Mail list logo
