Re: Another IIci question

--- Teri Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So the 7100 uses 72 pin SIMMs? I haven't really > checked the specs on those > yet. The IIci was set up as a desktop publishing > computer and it has quite > a few programs installed on it. I would need to > make sure that they are PPC > compatible

Re: Another IIci question

--- Teri Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, this question concerns accelerators and cache > cards. I've been > reading about accelerator cards for the IIci and it > sounds like the Daystar > Turbo 601 would be a good match. I'm seeing NuBus > and PDS cards. I > understand that these are

decoding attachments Re: Eudora eats outgoing attachments too! (was: incoming...)

--- mart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BBEdit? Thanks! > > -mart Make sure you get the beginning and ending tags of the encoded text. A good decoder will skip anything before it finds the start tag and ignore anything after the end tag. You can snag binary attachments off usenet that way, but i

Re: monitor question

--- Gamba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The IIci won't run a multiscan from its own video, > . > >the pickle > > Apple says in tech article that IIci biv will run > 14" and 15" Multiscan at > 640X480 with 3rd party adapter. > Wrong again? Nope. With a 3rd party adapter that has the abil

Re: What's in a PRAM...

--- Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday, April 5, 2002, at 01:57 PM, the pickle > wrote: > > > At 12:38 +0100 on 05/04/02, Mark Benson wrote: > > > >> clear the only sustained RAM on the computer? You > can't keep it hard > >> coded on a ROM, you'd have to do them one at a > time o

Re: Getting noticed

Mark Benson wrote: > > Is there any way to get listed on Google? I have noticed a few people on > Google from around here, do they just find you eventuall or an you ask > them to add your site to the DB? I put up a three pages a while back on old external floppies and Compact Mac clocks. I neve

Re: OLD e-mail; Was: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

Mikael Jolkkonen wrote: [snip] > I guess that these things are becoming less well known nowadays, when > most e-mail clients auto-decode pretty much everything, but this is the > way things were done in the past. I recall getting bin-hex attachments as multi-part e-mail. That is, multiple messag

Re: What's in a PRAM...

At 19:54 -0800 on 05/04/02, Gregg Eshelman wrote: >Let a vintage Mac sit around for a month or so with >a dead or missing PRAM battery and the manufacturing >date and hours of use will go *poof*. It definitely doesn't take that long :) the pickle FAQ Software Ar

Re: What's in a PRAM...

--- Joost van de Griek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The time of manufacture and the hours-of-use counter > aren't cleared with a > normal PRAM zap. They can be cleared only by a "deep > zap", which can be > administered by tools like TechTool, for last resort > troubleshooting > purposes (TechTo

Re: Chimes of whatever

About 5:51 pm -0800, on 4/5/02, an e-mail from Gamba related: -> >OK, now I know I don't need to short pins to run the ||si headlewss. -> > Now I need to know what typically cauises the chimes of doom, -> >death, whatever. -> > Both my ||si s do it. One recovers spontaneously after sev

Re: Chimes of whatever

>OK, now I know I don't need to short pins to run the ||si headlewss. > Now I need to know what typically cauises the chimes of doom, >death, whatever. > Both my ||si s do it. One recovers spontaneously after several >re-boots. The other whenever it feels like it. >Paul (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)

Re: Another IIci question

At 15:24 -0700 on 05/04/02, Sam Macomber wrote: >o never knew anything beyond a Q700 mobo would fit..I sense a >project coming! ;) The IIcx mobo was substantially similar in form factor to the 700, 650, 800, 7100, 8100, and many of the PCI-based boards. With anything after about the x10

Re: Another IIci question

>> > > It'd be cheaper to get a 7100 mobo and cram it in there, which would > give > you a native PPC-based motherboard for about 1/10 the price of a Turbo > 601. > You'd need new RAM, of course, but everything else would transfer right > over... > o never knew anything beyond a Q700 mobo wo

Re: Another IIci question

At 10:01 -0800 on 05/04/02, Teri Pittman wrote: >So the 7100 uses 72 pin SIMMs? I haven't really checked the specs on those Yes. >yet. The IIci was set up as a desktop publishing computer and it has quite >a few programs installed on it. I would need to make sure that they are PPC >compatibl

Re: Another IIci question

> You *do* realise how much those cost, right? Well, at this point, I'm surfing ebay *grin*! Since I keep reading that this is a good upgrade, I'm trying to learn as much about it as I can. First upgrade will probably be more RAM, as it only has 8MB on board. > > It'd be cheaper to get a 7100 mo

Re: TCP/IP Problems CHECKING THE BOX

yoyoyo wrote: My experience. Box never has been checked, not sure I want to check it? If I connect through the "PPP", I seem to be in control. I often get dropped off the server. When that happens, and I was connected and go to another web site or send mail Netscape starts to automatically conne

Re: Another IIci question

>I'm seeing NuBus and PDS cards. I understand that these are >different type slots. The IIci has three NuBus slots and one PDS slot. The NuBus slots are typically used for items like Ethernet interfaces and video cards. The PDS slot is is a Processor Direct Slot. >The information on Low End

Re: Another IIci question

At 09:37 -0800 on 05/04/02, Teri Pittman wrote: >Okay, this question concerns accelerators and cache cards. I've been >reading about accelerator cards for the IIci and it sounds like the Daystar >Turbo 601 would be a good match. I'm seeing NuBus and PDS cards. I You *do* realise how much thos

Another IIci question

Okay, this question concerns accelerators and cache cards. I've been reading about accelerator cards for the IIci and it sounds like the Daystar Turbo 601 would be a good match. I'm seeing NuBus and PDS cards. I understand that these are different type slots. Is one type preferable over the ot

Re: monitor question

At 07:50 -0800 on 05/04/02, Gamba wrote: >>The IIci won't run a multiscan from its own video, . >>the pickle > >Apple says in tech article that IIci biv will run 14" and 15" Multiscan at >640X480 with 3rd party adapter. I don't call a $35 adapter exactly *useful* in this situation. the

Eudora attachments RoundUp!

Hi! The Eudora 1.3.1 problems with incoming attachments are solved! Here's a summary: 1. The config menu: I see no difference/improvement with the choics 'application TEXT files belong to'. Eudora still encapsulates all the data into long multipart garbage mails. 2. the use of the decoder 'uuc

Eudora eats outgoing attachments too! (was: incoming...)

>Here's a trick I did on an attachment you sent me (yes it chews up >outgoing ones too). Aha! Mark, that's good to know. Although I have succesfully sent pictures with this Eudora recently. I'll dig in to it. I have some difficulties with Photoshop 3 and creator stuff too. That also might inte

Chimes of whatever

OK, now I know I don't need to short pins to run the ||si headlewss. Now I need to know what typically cauises the chimes of doom, death, whatever. Both my ||si s do it. One recovers spontaneously after several re-boots. The other whenever it feels like it. Anyone got any ideas?

Re: monitor question

On Friday, April 5, 2002, at 04:50 PM, Gamba wrote: >> The IIci won't run a multiscan from its own video, . >> the pickle > > Apple says in tech article that IIci biv will run 14" and 15" Multiscan > at > 640X480 with 3rd party adapter. > Wrong again? Don't wind him up Gamba, Apple say

Re: monitor question

>The IIci won't run a multiscan from its own video, . >the pickle Apple says in tech article that IIci biv will run 14" and 15" Multiscan at 640X480 with 3rd party adapter. Wrong again? Gamba -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by

Re: What's in a PRAM...

On Friday, April 5, 2002, at 01:57 PM, the pickle wrote: > At 12:38 +0100 on 05/04/02, Mark Benson wrote: > >> clear the only sustained RAM on the computer? You can't keep it hard >> coded on a ROM, you'd have to do them one at a time or at least a days > > Wlll...you *could* do a flash ROM..

Re: Getting noticed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -- > > Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:48:11 +0100 > Subject: Getting noticed > From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Is there any way to get listed on Google? I have noticed a few people on > Google from arou

Re: What's in a PRAM...

On 2002-04-05 13:38, "Mark Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday, April 5, 2002, at 08:53 AM, David Wood wrote: > >> It's been years since I had an ocassion to zap PRAM on any of my Macs >> and >> that was on my original Mac LC. However, it seems as if I recall that it >> also wiped and

Re: Getting noticed

At 12:48 +0100 on 05/04/02, Mark Benson wrote: >Is there any way to get listed on Google? I have noticed a few people on >Google from around here, do they just find you eventuall or an you ask >them to add your site to the DB? Read up on "how sites get listed" in the Google help. the pickle FA

Re: What's in a PRAM...

At 12:38 +0100 on 05/04/02, Mark Benson wrote: >clear the only sustained RAM on the computer? You can't keep it hard >coded on a ROM, you'd have to do them one at a time or at least a days Wlll...you *could* do a flash ROM... the pickle FAQ Software Archive

Re: Getting noticed

> Is there any way to get listed on Google? I have noticed a few people on > Google from around here, do they just find you eventuall or an you ask > them to add your site to the DB? Usually they just find you. New stuff I put up just automagically winds up in Google after a week or so. -- --

Getting noticed

Is there any way to get listed on Google? I have noticed a few people on Google from around here, do they just find you eventuall or an you ask them to add your site to the DB? -- Mark Benson Vintage Macs List Nanny aka silicon_valley_pirate_uk (Yahoo! Messenger) SilValle

Re: What's in a PRAM...

On Friday, April 5, 2002, at 08:53 AM, David Wood wrote: > It's been years since I had an ocassion to zap PRAM on any of my Macs > and > that was on my original Mac LC. However, it seems as if I recall that it > also wiped and reset some info about the original date of service (or > manufacture

Re: What's in a PRAM...

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Mark Benson wrote: > Apple's list of items held in PRAM on 68k machines taken from KBase > article #2238: Thanks Mark, (it all makes sense now ;O ). Anyway, it seems that in some cases, a good zap will help get a good boot, as when I changed the scsi set up on my IIfx incoor

Re: TCP/IP Problems

--- rlf9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Yup. In my experience the only time you need to > check > >that box is when you're using the Mac on it's own > >on a dialup account. For TCP/IP networking over a > >LAN you _don't_ want it checked. Silly Mac likes