Re: poorquality of voices

SubStandard YouSay Let's compare Apple's (Former) Wired EarPods-EarBuds TO Samsung's Wired EarBuds-EarPods NoQuestion Samsung WINS HandsDown JustSayin' My Samsung GalaxyS5 Wired EarPods-EarBuds are still IN GoodShape can't SayTheSame for My Apple EarBuds-EarPods from My Apple iPhone6

Re: poorquality of voices

: Mary Otten <motte...@gmail.com To: viphone@googlegroups.com Date sent: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 19:22:04 -0700 Subject: Re: poorquality of voices Unless you know that Apple has input into this whole deal, or you can prove that the exact same voices are used elsewhere and don't have this problem, I do

Re: poorquality of voices

I try other voices briefly but always go back to compact Samantha! She's like an old friend now! Smile. Ann Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:57 PM, Mary Otten wrote: > > Well, given the fact that there are apparently plenty of people on these > lists who

Re: poorquality of voices

Well, given the fact that there are apparently plenty of people on these lists who don't think the voices are problem, maybe Apple isn't hearing a lot from people who do think they are problem. And maybe they don't know. After all, the number of people who use these voices, compared to the

Re: poorquality of voices

Sorry, I was just assuming Apple was paying some royalties to Nuance to use their voices, so just like any other customer, they'd have the right to raise the issue with their supplier. I also assume Nuance gets quite a bit of mileage out of having their voices on such a popular device, so

Re: poorquality of voices

Unless you know that Apple has input into this whole deal, or you can prove that the exact same voices are used elsewhere and don't have this problem, I don't think you can blame Apple for the crappy voices. Where Apple could improve would be either to insist that nuance up their game, which

Re: poorquality of voices

You're right, but Apple chooses to use and upgrade these voices, and I'm sure they also have some influence with Nuance, so I think it's fair to let Apple share some of the responsibility. On 15/09/16 14:22, Devin Prater wrote: Apple gets these voices from Neuance. When an update comes out,

Re: poorquality of voices

m] On Behalf > > Of Rajmund > > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 7:50 AM > > To: viphone@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Re: poorquality of voices > > > > Hi, the enhanced Samantha is, excuse the language, but honestly and truly > > screwed. I had to immedia

Re: poorquality of voices

- From: Sieghard Weitzel <siegh...@live.ca> To: "viphone@googlegroups.com" <viphone@googlegroups.com> Date: Thursday, September 15, 2016 9:03 pm Subject: RE: poorquality of voices > > > I don't find any difference between iOS 9 enhanced Samantha and iOS 10

Re: poorquality of voices

, September 15, 2016 4:04 PM To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: poorquality of voices The default Samantha is much faster and better in my opinion. I deleted the enhanced and it went back to the default. On 9/15/2016 3:03 PM, Sieghard Weitzel wrote: I don't find any difference between iOS 9

Re: poorquality of voices

we all have to agree to disagree when it comes wto which voice ne prefers. -Original Message- From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rajmund Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 7:50 AM To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: poorquality of voices

RE: poorquality of voices

] On Behalf Of Rajmund Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 7:50 AM To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: poorquality of voices Hi, the enhanced Samantha is, excuse the language, but honestly and truly screwed. I had to immediately delete her, once I heard her. What happened to her? She

Re: poorquality of voices

Apple gets these voices from Neuance. When an update comes out, Apple updates the voices, so it isn't really Apple's fault. I do know what you mean about Samantha. I use Alex, or Fred. Devin Pratersent from Gmail. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Chantal Oakes wrote: >

Re: poorquality of voices

Hello Dan, I echo what you are saying. The quality of voices are very poor with this new update. One often wonders why they touch what isn't broken. The voices were not bad before they should just have left it alone. Just my opinion. Chantal Oakes > On Sep 15, 2016, at 7:29 AM, Dan

Re: poorquality of voices

for using my iPhone everyday, I prefer the compact voices. From: "Lois Butterfield" <lbutterfield...@gmail.com> To: <viphone@googlegroups.com> Date: 2016/09/15 10:43 AM Subject: Re: poorquality of voices Hi Dan, I tried a couple and ended up going back to compact Sa

Re: poorquality of voices

<lbutterfield...@gmail.com> To: viphone@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, September 15, 2016 3:42 pm Subject: Re: poorquality of voices > > > Hi Dan, > > I tried a couple and ended up going back to compact Samantha because I still > like it the best. > > Take c

Re: poorquality of voices

Hi Dan, I tried a couple and ended up going back to compact Samantha because I still like it the best. Take care, Lois -Original Message- From: Dan Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 10:29 AM To: viphone@googlegroups.com Subject: poorquality of voices Hi, I am wondering if this

Re: poorquality of voices

Hi Dan, It seems to me that there is a little bit of a distortion going on with these voices, it's almost like what used to happen if you have an analog recorder and you had your recording will set just a little bit too high, so that it was over modulated or somewhat distorted. Alex doesn't do