Replies inline.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Alia Atlas wrote:
> Hi Christian, Dhruv, Vinayak, & all,
>
> Interesting. In Boston, we have tried doing some remote hubs during the
> last 2 IETFs. This has been primarily routing related WGs and hosted at
> Juniper in Westford. While they're
Hi Christian, Dhruv, Vinayak, & all,
Interesting. In Boston, we have tried doing some remote hubs during the
last 2 IETFs. This has been primarily routing related WGs and hosted at
Juniper in Westford. While they're public, I think most of the attendance
has been from Juniper folks, because th
Thanks Vinayak. Let me add a few more points -
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Vinayak Hegde wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> My draft with some observations has some answers to your questions. Also
> some answers inline.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-remote-hubs-india-01
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2
Hi John,
My draft with some observations has some answers to your questions. Also
some answers inline.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-remote-hubs-india-01
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:14 PM, John Leslie wrote:
> Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> >
> > (1) WG champion: Having one or two WG champion at
> On 10/7/2016 1:12 PM, Christian O'Flaherty wrote:
>> There were hubs that failed because remote participation was impossible (low
>> quality)
>
>
> From this, do you have a sense of the minimum connectivity and other resource
> requirements, for successful technical operation of a hub?
for
Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
> (1) WG champion: Having one or two WG champion at the Hub helped to set the
> tone, go over the WG agenda in advance, answer questions and continue the
> discussion after the WG meeting.
What time commitment is expected? (I assume the expertise expected is
for a single
Hi Alia,
Our IETF 94 hub in Bangalore was quite successful. The makeup was made up
of a few IETFers but mostly interested developers. In fact, some of the
participants went on to attend and present in IETF 96 and took part in the
Hackathon. They are also planning to join IETF 97 in Seoul.
I am o
On 10/7/2016 1:12 PM, Christian O'Flaherty wrote:
There were hubs that failed because remote participation was impossible (low
quality)
From this, do you have a sense of the minimum connectivity and other
resource requirements, for successful technical operation of a hub?
d/
--
Dave Cr
Hi Alia,
There’s a draft that will be updated soon with some experiences and
recommendations.
Some comments inline:
> I am curious about how the various IETF Hubs have been doing?
> What activities have you tried and found useful/successful/interesting?
Hubs in Latin America have been divers
