Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?

Hi Christian, Dhruv, Vinayak, & all, Interesting. In Boston, we have tried doing some remote hubs during the last 2 IETFs. This has been primarily routing related WGs and hosted at Juniper in Westford. While they're public, I think most of the attendance has been from Juniper folks, because

Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?

Thanks Vinayak. Let me add a few more points - On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Vinayak Hegde wrote: > Hi John, > > My draft with some observations has some answers to your questions. Also > some answers inline. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-remote-hubs-india-01

Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?

Dhruv Dhody wrote: > > (1) WG champion: Having one or two WG champion at the Hub helped to set the > tone, go over the WG agenda in advance, answer questions and continue the > discussion after the WG meeting. What time commitment is expected? (I assume the expertise

Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?

Hi Alia, Our IETF 94 hub in Bangalore was quite successful. The makeup was made up of a few IETFers but mostly interested developers. In fact, some of the participants went on to attend and present in IETF 96 and took part in the Hackathon. They are also planning to join IETF 97 in Seoul. I am