Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Paul Timmins
"Formal" process is that your CLEC looks at your LOA, tucks it in a drawer after a cursory glance (hopefully they at least look at it), then submits a LSR (electronically or via excel spreadsheet) to the losing carrier. The losing carrier gives an FOC within 24 hours for usually within 3 days

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Peter Rad.
Some of that may have to do with Syniverse being the porting engine for those 3. On 2/10/2016 9:57 AM, Nick Olsen wrote: Exactly this. I actually ported my personal cell number to Verizon from ATT yesterday. Gave the rep my ATT account number, He 30 seconds later asked me for the PIN I set on

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Nick Olsen
Exactly this. I actually ported my personal cell number to Verizon from ATT yesterday. Gave the rep my ATT account number, He 30 seconds later asked me for the PIN I set on my ATT account. I provided and my number was working before I hit the door on the way out. Total port time was <5

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Anthony Orlando via VoiceOps
That's why I hired your firm ML!!! You know how to deal with these issues and get it done. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 10, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Mary Lou Carey > wrote: > > I couldn't pull up the WPR, but obviously their WPR is nothing like an LSR, > which is all

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Mary Lou Carey
Thanks Anthony! I'm quite sure my parents didn't have as much of an appreciation for my stubborn "I'm going to find a way to make this happen" attitude as my CLEC clients do! LOL! Mary Lou > On February 10, 2016 at 12:22 PM Anthony Orlando wrote: > > That's why I hired

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Paul Timmins
My understanding is that the winning carrier submits the subscription, issues an electronic WPR (https://www.syniverse.com/files/Single_Line_WPR.pdf) - similar to an LSR. The losing carrier verifies the WPR's accuracy (TN/PIN/Address/Zip) and issues a confirmation and concurrence, and then the

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Mary Lou Carey
I couldn't pull up the WPR, but obviously their WPR is nothing like an LSR, which is all written in code and requires a bunch of fields that verify way more than just the TN/PIN/Address/ZIP accuracy. My guess is that it doesn't require a lot of training to teach someone how to fill out a WPRs

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Paul Timmins
How about a Vatican II for LNP processes, eh? On Wed, 02/10/2016 12:20 PM, Mary Lou Carey wrote: > .mceResizeHandle {position: absolute;border: 1px solid black;background: #FFF;width: 5px;height: 5px;z-index: 1}.mceResizeHandle:hover {background:

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Mary Lou Carey
That's funny! > On February 10, 2016 at 2:17 PM Paul Timmins wrote: > > How about a Vatican II for LNP processes, eh? > > On Wed, 02/10/2016 12:20 PM, Mary Lou Carey > wrote: > > > > I couldn't pull up the WPR, but obviously their WPR

Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting

2016-02-10 Thread Colton Conor
So what is the best case senario under todays rules for wireline carriers? Lets assume we are talking about a CLEC with their own switch and number pool porting away from the incumbend ILEC (Verizon or AT wireline). Assume the CLEC has access to NPAC. How does this process even work? Today we