Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-17 Thread Adam Vocks
: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:20 PM To: Adam Vocks Cc: VoiceOps Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 I have a trouble ticket open with Hypercube. Their rate is super low for this NPA/NXX and is the route has long PDD then fails. So I'm wondering if once this route is fixed, if most

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-17 Thread Adam Vocks
Of Adam Vocks Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 8:18 AM To: Jared Geiger Cc: VoiceOps Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Jared, wondering if Hypercube ever got back with you? I’ve here a couple people tell me now that Hypercube has the lowest rate for 217/777 so I’m wondering if most LCR

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-16 Thread Gurskis, Marius
Tested ok over Level3 and Verizon SIP today - Marius -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Paul Timmins Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:02 PM To: Adam Vocks; voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Level 3

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Feby Francis
Its works fine for me from Verizon –Georgia wireless line. Feby Francis From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:32 AM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Thanks Kidd, Here’s

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Adam Vocks
] New Exchange 217/777 On 07/15/2014 10:44 AM, Adam Vocks wrote: :-) Take Kidd's call from Verizon in Colorado. If there isn't our exchange in their local switch, do they forward the call on to another switch in hopes that it will know where to send it? Similar to a default gateway in IP

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Alex Balashov
On 07/15/2014 10:52 AM, Adam Vocks wrote: So, at the very least, I need to start looking at each of the ILEC's tandems in a specific LATA? The broad answer is yes, but specific answers will vary with the LECs' interconnection arrangements, which could entail some private interconnects. --

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Adam Vocks
OK, I'll keep opening trouble tickets when something is reported... Sigh... -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:56 AM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Adam Vocks
Thanks everyone for your help. I hope to be able to pay it forward someday. Adam From: Kidd Filby [mailto:kidd.fi...@corp.forethought.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:23 AM To: Adam Vocks Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Just got off the phone with Verizon. Funny

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Graham Freeman
Test results: Verizon Wireless in California: success Sonic Telecom: dead air Sprint (via Ting): dead air Graham Freeman Sent from my mobile On 14 Jul 2014, at 15:09, Adam Vocks adam.vo...@cticomputers.com wrote: Hi everyone, I stumbled on this list recently and have been reading

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Nick Crocker
VZW out of Austin, TX successful call completion to the test TN -Nick On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Graham Freeman gfree...@sungevity.com wrote: Test results: Verizon Wireless in California: success Sonic Telecom: dead air Sprint (via Ting): dead air Graham Freeman Sent from my

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Paul Timmins
, at the very least, I need to start looking at each of the ILEC's tandems in a specific LATA? Adam -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:48 AM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Adam Vocks
[mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Paul Timmins Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:30 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 What's worse really is not that you have to look at ILEC tandems out of area - they don't perform any route filtering

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Jamie O. Montgomery
Freeman gfree...@sungevity.com To: Adam Vocks adam.vo...@cticomputers.com Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Message-ID: 723e94f6-3855-4d5c-865c-87e8db2da...@sungevity.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Test results: Verizon Wireless

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Paul Timmins
To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 What's worse really is not that you have to look at ILEC tandems out of area - they don't perform any route filtering, if the originating caller is calling out of area, it gets sent to their PIC/LPIC LD carrier. So what you

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Paul Timmins
To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 What's worse really is not that you have to look at ILEC tandems out of area - they don't perform any route filtering, if the originating caller is calling out of area, it gets sent to their PIC/LPIC LD carrier. So what you

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-14 Thread Shripal Daphtary
973432 works to your test number on ATT wireless (347) 415- doesn't work via level3. Dead air then disco. Thanks, Shri Shripal On Jul 14, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Adam Vocks adam.vo...@cticomputers.com wrote: Hi everyone, I stumbled on this list recently and have been reading