Horace Heffner writes:
The Letts effect is not merely due to the heat pulse (heating) from a laser.
That's what I said.
- Jed
Can you rationalize how the "cold" in a certain kind of cold fusion
experiment can, in effect, become suddenlyvery, very hot: Hot enough for
thermonuclear fusion, in fact?
Let's assume for the moment that a nuclear reaction occurs rarely at a few
hundred degrees K in a highly stressed metal
Hi Ed.
Presumable you mean this paper.
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEuseofavery.pdf
I had a few questions about the Letts work; true to form you addressed
them all in the paper. That you saw no resonant peak for laser
frequency is a critical observation; given the fractal nature
of
Regarding the use of cold fusion as a weapon, Martin Fleischmann has
expressed concerns about this in the past, but he recently told me he
thought the Popular Mechanics cover illustration was excessive. He said:
There is, of course, a connection between Cold Fusion and the National
Security
Keith Nagel writes:
So let us wait until whoever
it is makes his first hundred million TWD (Taiwan New Dollars).
Maybe we can extort some money out of the fellow, in exchange for
selectively erasing the archives.
With all due respect Jed, you really seem not to understand how
the patent
At 9:56 AM 8/19/4, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner writes:
The Letts effect is not merely due to the heat pulse (heating) from a laser.
That's what I said.
On the contrary, 3:23 PM 8/17/4, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I think it has been known for some time that things like
laser light or a heat
At 6:52 AM 8/19/4, Edmund Storms wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
At 3:23 PM 8/17/4, Jed Rothwell wrote:
As I recall, Ed Storms replicated this and was duly impressed, but not all
that impressed.
Ed Storms did *not* replicate Letts' experiment, as I pointed out here on
vortex at the time. He
Horace Heffner wrote:
At 6:52 AM 8/19/4, Edmund Storms wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
At 3:23 PM 8/17/4, Jed Rothwell wrote:
As I recall, Ed Storms replicated this and was duly impressed, but not all
that impressed.
Ed Storms did *not* replicate Letts' experiment, as I pointed out
At 4:25 PM 8/19/4, Edmund Storms wrote:
What exactly do you mean by replication? Do I have to make the same
mistakes? Do
I have to use a calorimeter that is affected by a magnetic field?
You have to do what you apparently thus far have entirely failed to do.
You have to have some approximate
Hi Bill.
You need to read the paper in question; Jones is presenting Ken's
quote without the necessary context. What Ken is driving at
is that the EV contains a substantial amount of like charge
in a small volume. The forces being balanced by such a structure
would, at least superficially, seem
10 matches
Mail list logo
