The age of the Earth debate began with much shorter time scales.
Although Niagara Falls was not featured in the initial debate
I think it is good to consider because the history of the
falls is only about twice as old as biblical creation.
The river flows over an escapement with harder rock on top
Title: Re: Restoring Newton's axiom of motion
Yes, Newton was alluding to the question
" can theories that are philosophical be proven by mathematics ? "
If by "proven" you mean what I think you mean, then I think Newton
would answer No.
Why did you change the title of this thread from "Re
To my question posed to Harry.. Was Newton alluding to
the question.. " can theories that are philosophical be proven by mathematics ?
"
Harry replied .. YES!
For the sake of pure conjecture lets agree with
Newton.
How do you suppose Newton would have contructed a
mathematical model of..
Here's something from a basement inventor: weird EM effect makes solids
transparent, ruins electronics, kills goldfish?
http://www.baytoday.ca/content/news/details.asp?c=6657
http://www.baytoday.ca/content/news/gallery.asp?c=6657&Title=%3Cb%3EHurtubise+says+invention+sees+through+walls%2DB
--- Mike Carrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MC: As far as getting the Tempest protocols, these
> are government classified
> documents and unless you have a real need to know
> and suitable clearances
> you will not get them.
I think most of what Mr. Malloy seeks may be found
here:
http://cry
> I put in the radio to demonstrate the Faraday Cage effect
but to my disgust the radio sounded as loud as ever. In
fact the 12x6 lid, which had folded edges soldered at the
corners, was a close fit but not air tight. Presumably the
long cracks were sufficient to allow penetration of the AM
signal
I'll shy away from the argument. :-)
However, the 72,000 Trillion Neutrinos and/or Antineutrinos per square
meter per bathing the earth each second could mess up the radio decay
dating (Radio-Dating) results making the Old Earth argument questionable.
6 carbon-14 (5770 yrs) + Neutrino
At 03:26 pm 19-01-05 -0500, you wrote:
>MC: In my metaphor about regarding EM radiation as a liquid or gas getting
>out of a box, that was a simple way of saying that any discontinuity in the
>shielding of a Faraday cage can function as an antenna and allow some slight
>radiation to escape. It tak
At 12:09 PM 1/18/5, thomas malloy wrote:
and Horace Heffner responded;
>
You people need to visit J C Whitney's website and look for a gas
powered heater. I'm glad to hear that only a few of you are freezing
to death in your cars!
Actually, so few people freeze here because they enough common sens
Title: Re: ionizing radiation
In terms of water waves, would a "scalar wave" be a ripple
on the surface of swell wave.
Harry
Merlyn at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry Baron, but what!?!
The EM spectrum is as follows:
3 - 30 Hz ELF
30 - 300 Hz ULF
3 - 30 kHz VLF
30 kHz - 30 GHz Radio
Eleven new ICCF-9 have been uploaded. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/FilesByDate.htm
All ICCF-9 papers currently on file should be listed here, as well:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF09.htm
Information about the 2004 DoE Review has been collected here:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/DoeReview.h
Re: ionizing radiationThomas Malloy wrote:
Actually the longer the wavelength, the greater the penetrating power.
Cosmic rays penetrate because the are particles, not EM radiation. The
shorter wavelengths have a stronger effect because they carry more energy.
Mike Carrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I posted;
and Jeff Fink responded;
- Original Message -
Unfortunately there are Christians who insist on a literal
6, 24 hour day creation, despite the fact that the Hebrew text can be
read to mean either that or a preexistent Earth which had been
rendered dead. While this sort of abso
Title: Re: ionizing radiation
Actually the longer the wavelength, the
greater the penetrating power. Cosmic rays penetrate because the
are particles, not EM radiation. The shorter wavelengths have a
stronger effect because they carry more energy.
Mike Carrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are yo
revtec wrote:
>and Harry Veeder replied;
Not necessarily. If the bible is the word of God, then the meaning of the
bible is almost as mysterious as God.
I don't see anything mysterious about it. It's a straight forward
account of a battle between good and evil.
Hi Jeff.
You write:
>When I was fifteen years old, a local business backfilled an area to extend
>a parking lot. They used ash from a coal fired power station to fill the
>area to over 10 ft deep. At some time later, a 20 minute thunderstorm cut
>an 8 ft deep gully through the semi-stable ash.
I'm sorry Baron, but what!?!
The EM spectrum is as follows:
3 - 30 Hz ELF
30 - 300 Hz ULF
3 - 30 kHz VLF
30 kHz - 30 GHz Radio
This is a wavelength of 10km - 1cm
Above Radio frequencies it is typically listed by wavelength rather than frequency.
30 - .76 micrometers Infrared and Heat
.76 -
Dear all,
in case you havn't seen the program for the APS' cold fusion session:
http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR05/SessionIndex/55/?SessionEventID=28515
The session is one day late: Sixteen years ago CF was announced by
Fleischmann/Pons.
Best wishes
Haiko
- Original Message -
From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005
> Unfortunately there are Christians who insist on a literal
> 6, 24 hour day creation, despite the fact that the Hebrew text can b
Actually the longer the wavelength, the greater the penetrating power. Cosmic rays penetrate because the are particles, not EM radiation. The shorter wavelengths have a stronger effect because they carry more energy.Mike Carrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom wrote again:>> >Tom wrote:>> and Mike
20 matches
Mail list logo
