Terry, you have shown just enough interest so let's give this a go eh? (ie.
Any at all)
The crux of this is that it is possible to suck in fields by propper
manipulation of space-time. (which is fluid)
I can't say for sure if this relates to radio but it likely does, but now
I'm going to have to
Yea, Notice Robert A. Heinlein identified his book Stranger in a strange
land ( Wiki) to be a work of science fiction.
The Manson cult borrowed heavily on it's text.. which only goes to prove
that the devil is in the details.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL
John Berry wrote..
Did I waste my time typing this? (if you read this in interest please say so)
Howdy John,
Discussion among Vorts is never a waste of time. Bill Beatty's challenge to Ron
Stiffler began a most healthy dialogue much needed as the search goes on. It
was unfortunate that Ron
Interesting post, John.
Lots of ground covered, but returning to one point:
6. Osamu, a patent where 2 magnets sandwich a diamagnetic material with
a coil wound over) produces stronger reception of signal, much. (lots of
correlations with joining of diamagnetic materials with magnetic ones...
There is already a crude replication on Hartmann's site. Details sparce,
but the core is not radioactive, at least.
I had hoped by now that there would have been some published
replications. Maybe this weekend. If and when, or should I say 'as soon
as' this happens, then people will be
3) Dr. Stiffler has significant residual charge from when he was
elevated to the top of the tower during the lightning storm with
jacobs' ladders playing in the background . . .
On 10/27/07, William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two things confuse me about my idea that Ron's device is picking
At least they did not eat their dead. Or did they . . .?
Terry
On 10/27/07, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, Notice Robert A. Heinlein identified his book Stranger in a strange
land ( Wiki) to be a work of science fiction.
The Manson cult borrowed heavily on it's text.. which
On 27/10/2007 10:16 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
For those who don't have google sniffing out news feeds on STEORN,
Sean McCarthy granted another interview on Oct 26.
http://freeenergytruth.blogspot.com/
If you can believe the contents it would appear that STORN technology
will rise again.
With regard to:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22556281-661,00.html
I just noticed that the shadow only makes sense if the figure is
rotating counter-clockwise. Rotating counter-clockwise, you should only
be able to see her left foot when it's at a distance and in the
Malakey, IMO. I am not familiar with a time/energy equivalent
equation. Unless you simply solve Einstein for time:
s = m(kg/j)^1/2, seconds equal distance times the square root of mass
over energy ?
Sprain believes the same thing. I think both have a problem
understanding movement of energy
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Craig Haynie wrote:
With regard to:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22556281-661,00.html
I just noticed that the shadow only makes sense if the figure is
rotating counter-clockwise. Rotating counter-clockwise, you should only
be able to see her left
William Beaty wrote:
Two things confuse me about my idea that Ron's device is picking up RF
energy from the AM radio tower.
The problems you point out with the AM radio explanation are serious.
To tell the truth, I've had trouble with that explanation all along --
it still seems,
Has anyone noticed that at some point in the progress that Ron
started using an AC coupling through the bottom of the breadboard
backing plate? For example see Fig. 22 of the following:
http://www.drstiffler.com/ce4.asp
I have a question about parts. The above gives specs for the diodes
On Oct 26, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
Perhaps there's a thermoelectric (Peltier) heat pump effect. There
are
obviously junctions between different conducting materials.
An interesting control experiment would be to power the LEDs with
ordinary DC and see what kind
[Apologies if folks have already seen this one -- it was new to me. I
think Jones may already have speculated about this possibility also, but
this article goes into quite a bit more detail than anything I noticed
previously on Vortex.]
Interesting article, with a possible explanation for
I still have to chuckle over the six (or maybe it was five) thing...
...it's almost to the level of a comedy routine. Where are Abbott and
Costello when we need them?
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
[Apologies if folks have already seen this one -- it was new to me. I
think Jones may
On 10/27/07, John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry, you have shown just enough interest so let's give this a go eh? (ie.
Any at all)
Whew, what a summary! Yes, I am familiar with most of your examples.
Okay, my wife is laid up with cosmetic surgery and I have some time
between the bell
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, John Berry wrote:
According to Mr. Beaty the reason energy sucking antennas work is not
because the field of the transmitter is actually sucked into the receiving
element, but because the field of the receiving element enhances the voltage
induced.
Probably my article
Yep! It would be funny.. except for the serious side to the equation. It
senses more like a puppet master that has three puppets strung out.. the one
you are told to love, the one you are told to hate and the one you are told
to ignore.
In the wizard of Oz, the wizard is revealed by Toto
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Yep! It would be funny.. except for the serious side to the equation. It
senses more like a puppet master that has three puppets strung out.. the
one you are told to love, the one you are told to hate and the one you
are told to ignore.
In the wizard of Oz, the wizard
On 27/10/2007 1:49 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Malakey, IMO. I am not familiar with a time/energy equivalent
equation.
Novel ideas tend to be unfamiliar.
I am not saying it is the mostest bestest idea. ;-)
Unless you simply solve Einstein for time:
s = m(kg/j)^1/2, seconds equal
They would have to refuel before returning but I see no reason take off from Minot when the mission would likely be
flown out of Robbins anyway. Also, there are plenty of Nukes available at Robbins.
If the AGM's were armed, active attached to the aircraft electronics the crew would know it. If
Indeed Ron.
And now 6 of those involved at Barkersfield and Minot have been killed.
On 10/28/07, Ron Wormus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They would have to refuel before returning but I see no reason take off
from Minot when the mission would likely be
flown out of Robbins anyway. Also, there are
23 matches
Mail list logo
