Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
Stephen
If I can judge by Jones's rather strong denial of the validity of
these classic experiments
Whoa. I am not denying their validity for the limited scope which
they encompass- but why extend that further ? They do have historical
meanin
United States Patent Application 20080226010
Sesselmann; Steven Arnold September 18, 2008
Reactor For Producing Controlled Nuclear Fusion
Abstract
Method and apparatus for producing controlled steady state nuc
Sorry I meant to pass on Stephen's link to another list.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 9:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:An astonishingly simple model of Presidential elections
>
> From another list.
> Harry
>From another list.
Harry
>An astonishingly simple model of Presidential elections
>
> Here's a model developed back around 1980, which was back-tested
> againstevery Presidential election back to 1860, and which has
> correctlypredicted every election since it was developed (that's
> six out
Jones Beene wrote:
> Stephen
>
>> If I can judge by Jones's rather strong denial of the validity of
>> these classic experiments
>
> Whoa. I am not denying their validity for the limited scope which
> they encompass- but why extend that further ? They do have historical
> meaning and purpos
Stephen
> If I can judge by Jones's rather strong denial of the validity of these
> classic experiments
Whoa. I am not denying their validity for the limited scope which they
encompass- but why extend that further ? They do have historical meaning and
purpose, but it can be easily exaggera
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
> Jones Beene wrote:
>> - Original Message From: Stephen A. Lawrence
>>
>> http://www.energyscience.org.uk/
>>
>>> It appears to be rather large [Aspden effect]. He appears to
>>> "believe in" an aether.
>> ... as well he should- but his effect is not large
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:47:49 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I like this quote from the airturbineengine page:
>
>> The air we breathe is the same air that drives the AATE; no wind
>> required. This is not a perpetual motion machine.
>
>It runs forever with no fuel or
Jones Beene wrote:
> - Original Message From: Stephen A. Lawrence
>
> http://www.energyscience.org.uk/
>
>> It appears to be rather large [Aspden effect]. He appears to
>> "believe in" an aether.
>
> ... as well he should- but his effect is not large.
>
>> Jed (or anyone), do you kn
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:45:03 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>There are better descriptions here:
>
>http://www.greencar.com/features/volt-facts/
>
>Being a serial hybrid, the volt *could* be battery only for short ranges.
...but that's the very definition of a plug-in hybrid
- Original Message
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
http://www.energyscience.org.uk/
> It appears to be rather large [Aspden effect]. He appears to "believe in" an
> aether.
... as well he should- but his effect is not large.
> Jed (or anyone), do you know of anyplace on his site where he
ohh, point, major changes. so three, becuase its an OR on the last two.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Edmund Storms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
> Here's a model developed back around 1980, which was back-tested against
> every Presiden
On Oct 7, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Here's a model developed back around 1980, which was back-tested
against
every Presidential election back to 1860, and which has correctly
predicted every election since it was developed (that's six out of six
predictions made in advance
we can check key 11, and MAYBE key four.
wow.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a model developed back around 1980, which was back-tested against
> every Presidential election back to 1860, and which has correctly
> predicted every election s
Here's a model developed back around 1980, which was back-tested against
every Presidential election back to 1860, and which has correctly
predicted every election since it was developed (that's six out of six
predictions made in advance and born out):
http://www.forecastingprinciples.com/Politica
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> thomas malloy wrote:
>
>> Harold Aspden showed that a gyroscope composed of a magnet, when spun
>> up, and then stopped, it can be returned to it's previous motion with
>> way less energy than was required to set it in motion the first time.
>> This is the Aspden Effect.
>
Meant to include the press release too:
http://www.solyndra.com/News/Press-Release-01
This is a company that is only three years old and is ramping-up manufacturing
to produce thin film PV *tubes* -- of a composition not unlike the better known
Nanosolar.
I believe it is yet another spin-off
http://www.solyndra.com/Products/More-Electricity
Howdy Vorts,
I would have preferred the descriptive wording of this press release be more
scientific. When dealing with theoritical physics it is always best to describe
most sub-atomic theory as theoritical imagination since science has NOT been
able to confirm the explanations as claimed in t
thomas malloy wrote:
Harold Aspden showed that a gyroscope composed of a magnet, when
spun up, and then stopped, it can be returned to it's previous
motion with way less energy than was required to set it in motion
the first time. This is the Aspden Effect.
Harold Aspden is an astounding per
Possibly you are speaking of the Aspden Effect?
Terry
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Benjamin Rozanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering whether the effects of a spinning mass could be playing
> a part.
>
> Bruce DePalma found that a spinning mass apperently gains energy.
>
> Could th
I like this quote from the airturbineengine page:
> The air we breathe is the same air that drives the AATE; no wind
> required. This is not a perpetual motion machine.
It runs forever with no fuel or energy input, using air but without
requiring wind (or, by implication, a temperature differenti
There are better descriptions here:
http://www.greencar.com/features/volt-facts/
Being a serial hybrid, the volt *could* be battery only for short ranges.
Terry
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Robin van Spaandonk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Mon, 06
Howdy Robin,
In Lost Wages, as we call Las Vegas, the Roulette wheel is the money maker.
The air turbine is only a minor competitor. This turbine idea has been
around for years. First clue to the fantasy is the 30,000 RPM speed of the
turbine. They enclose the blades in a acrylic housing to vie
25 matches
Mail list logo
