On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Mike Carrell wrote:
Mills has pledged to post progess as possible, and he has done so.
It is probable that as BLP progesses on their current path, a
firestorm of criticism and opposition may emerge, and BLP must be
prepared for it. Remember the story of the
Better formatted text of this will be maintained at:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CasimirBoiler.pdf
Casimir Boiler
Horace Heffner August 1, 2009
OBJECTIVE
The purpose here is to provide a means of extracting energy upon
demand from the zero point field (ZPF), by
--- On Sat, 8/1/09, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
state of mind.
If you're going to use English to communicate with others,
please use
the words to mean what we all agree that they mean.
snip
time is not a state of mind.
snip
A country mile is not an hour.
snip
And
Horace,
This is very provocative. Perhaps a simple static (pressure differential)
experiment could be 'telling' without going all the way to dynamic
circuit... IOW is flow through really necessary, given that Raney nickel
could provide the necessary cavities, in a static colloid, so that normal
By any reasonable standard, Mills should succeed if he surmounts the present
technical problem, application of acquired knowledge to a 'water engine'
that delivers useful power. That will be unprecedented. Because nobody else
has done it, and the path to it is through his magnum opus, GUTCP,
Hi
Thanks for this post about Hotson's ideas.
Don't know about you, but to me, everything is starting to make a lot of
sense.
Please take into account that when Hotson says 'imaginary direction' you
can read '4th spatial dimension'.
And when, relativistically it's said 'time dilation' or 'time
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy
Please take into account that when Hotson says 'imaginary direction' you
can read '4th spatial dimension'.
Are you familiar with the Dirac concept of reciprocal space?
... or rather, like so many things that have been updated in order to bring
Without commenting on individual abduction cases, the general descriptions of
aliens fits what I would expect from an extremely advanced technological
culture. Such as:
Minimized Individuality ( or none!) Take a good look at our technology and
consider that we have progressed from spears to
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
--- On Sat, 8/1/09, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
state of mind.
If you're going to use English to communicate with others, please
use the words to mean what we all agree that they mean.
snip
time is not a state of mind.
snip
A country mile
From Mr Lawrance:
You don't sound like an annoying broken record. To be blunt, you sound
silly, asking that. I don't think there's any disagreement at all over
what would constitute an authentic alien artifact -- it would be a
piece of litter left by an authentic alien, and an authentic
From Mr. Lawrence,
...
Just some idle off-the-wall speculation follows...a fable of sorts:
...
They pondered these issues for a millennium or two, or perhaps it was
for only a couple of microseconds - time can be such an ephemeral
state of mind.
If you're going to use English to
Mauro Lacy wrote:
I was thinking recently that it's not enough for gravity to be explained
merely as a consequence of a distortion of space.
It's not a distortion of space, it's a distortion of spaceTIME, and the
difference is extremely important.
The metric in 4-dimensional spacetime is
[Snip]
On Jul 23, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
By the way, the patent which apparently started Frank off on this, and
the effort to produce a device based on it, are described here:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/
[Snip]
It's an interesting concept: squash atoms through tiny
One of the most well-known and examined artifacts is from the crash at
Ubatuba, Brazil:
http://ufologie.net/htm/ubatuba57.htm
The examination of some of the material:
http://www.nicap.org/ubatubanal.htm
Terry
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote:
From Mr. Zell,
Without commenting on individual abduction cases, the general descriptions
of aliens fits what I would expect from an extremely advanced technological
culture. Such as:
Minimized Individuality ( or none!) Take a good look at our technology
and consider that we have
From Mr. Lawrence:
...
I was objecting to a discussion of the *definition* of an alien
artifact, not to the question of whether we've got some. And it is
also quite possible that I totally missed your point.
Let's go back to some previous comments in an attempt to pick up our
discussions
From Mr. Blanton:
One of the most well-known and examined artifacts is from the crash at
Ubatuba, Brazil:
http://ufologie.net/htm/ubatuba57.htm
The examination of some of the material:
http://www.nicap.org/ubatubanal.htm
Excerpt:
These tests indicated that the material was very pure
There are distinct physical aspects common among many experiencers
which are known by investigators but are not shared with the public.
It serves as a test of the experience. It has to do with the
surroundings seen by the victim and certain events that occur during
the examination.
AFAIK,
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Gravity is *NOT* a force in GR theory, of course, and a body in free
fall follows a geodesic.
I read the principle equivalence as implying gravity is either a force
OR a geodesic path depending on the situation. It is a force (weight)
when a body is subjected to
From Mr. Blanton,
There are distinct physical aspects common among many experiencers
which are known by investigators but are not shared with the public.
It serves as a test of the experience. It has to do with the
surroundings seen by the victim and certain events that occur during
the
Test Ignore
Trying a new email setting.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Steven, it really helps not to have a ready made explanation, such as
you have, when evaluating the UFO events. Such expected notions cause
a person to reject data, perhaps subconsciously. For example, you
would like the phenomenon to involve some kind multi-dimensional
reality. You then
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Mauro Lacy wrote:
I was thinking recently that it's not enough for gravity to be explained
merely as a consequence of a distortion of space.
It's not a distortion of space, it's a distortion of spaceTIME, and the
difference is extremely important.
Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy
Please take into account that when Hotson says 'imaginary direction' you
can read '4th spatial dimension'.
Are you familiar with the Dirac concept of reciprocal space?
No, but I'll read about it. Reciprocal space
Ackshully, it was Budd Hopkins who first was criticized for extensive
use of hypnotic recall, (Witnessed the case of Linda Cortile
(Napolitano)). But, then again, Dr. John Mack used a similar,
although somewhat far-eastern version of hypnosis.
John, G-d rest his soul, also believed, much like
Years ago Ripley's Believe it or Not reported that a person went out in
their yard one day and found a small pile of metal pieces all shaped like
the letter E.
What were they?
How did they get there?
Could they be of alien origin?
They offered no answer.
Anybody want to guess?
Think about
On Aug 2, 2009, at 8:01 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Mr. Storms
Steven, it really helps not to have a ready made explanation, such as
you have, when evaluating the UFO events. Such expected notions cause
a person to reject data, perhaps subconsciously. For example, you
27 matches
Mail list logo
