Kyle Mcallister wrote:
> --- On Sat, 8/1/09, Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> state of mind.
>> If you're going to use English to communicate with others, please
>> use the words to mean what we all agree that they mean.
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> "time" is not a state of mind.
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> A country mile is not an hour.
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> And a letter in which you mix up a state of mind with an elapsed
>> time is not a serious attempt at communication, IMNSHO.
> 
> Er. To be honest, I understood pretty clearly what Steven was saying.
> I don't see what the irritation is about. Why are you getting so
> irritated with posts concerning this topic? Before you ask, no, I'm
> not really a 'believer' in abductions and all that, but I am open
> minded enough to say, 'let's have a look.'
> 
> When you get down to it, perception is all we have. Period. Notes
> mean nothing, from a certain point of view. "What did I /really/ mean
> when I wrote that? What was the feeling behind it?" OR "Does the
> voltmeter really say 12.03V, or is there a trick of light on it? Am I
> perceiving something /other/ than what it really is?" But that's
> beside my point.
> 
> You seem like this topic is annoying you. Why? Just enjoy it, go
> along for the ride. Or as some would say, "Dude. Chill."
> 
> Hell, if  *I* can mellow out, it should be child's play for anyone
> else to.

OK.

Reply via email to