2009/10/22 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Conventional sources such as solar thermal or advanced fission could provide
far more energy per capita with greatly reduced pollution. Cold fusion or
some other radically new source of energy could do this at a cost 100 to
1000 times cheaper
Michael Foster wrote:
Oh Wow! I guess they'll give a Nobel Prize for physics and chemistry now.
That reminds me of a story of a WWII vet, a hero who often wore his medals.
Someone remarked that the guy seemed to have a swelled head because he preened
around in public wearing medals.
Horace Heffner wrote:
This is to examine the feasibility that gravity has a role in fusion
at some distance. The Coulomb force between two particles is:
Fc = Cc * q1 * q2 / r^2
where Cc is the Coulomb constant 8.99x10^9 m/F, the charge q1 or q2
of a particle is typically
See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/8103557.stm
QUOTE:
An international plan to build a nuclear fusion reactor is being
threatened by rising costs, delays and technical challenges.
Emails leaked to the BBC indicate that construction costs for the
experimental fusion project called
Steven Krivit wrote:
Jed,
For made-up nonsense that is irrelevant and unimportant, you
seem to be reacting quite strongly.
You wish. Actually, I consider these reports unimportant. But it irks
me that you make light of Parkinson's disease and dismiss the
impositions it imposes on
See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/8103557.stm
QUOTE:
An international plan to build a nuclear fusion reactor is being
threatened by rising costs, delays and technical challenges.
Emails leaked to the BBC indicate that construction costs for the
experimental fusion project called
MIT links to the Obama visit:
http://amps-web.mit.edu/public/amps/webcast/2009/obama-2009oct23/http://amps-web.mit.edu/public/amps/webcast/2009/obama-2009oct23/
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2009/obama-event.html
- Jed
On Oct 23, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
This is to examine the feasibility that gravity has a role in fusion
at some distance. The Coulomb force between two particles is:
Fc = Cc * q1 * q2 / r^2
where Cc is the Coulomb constant 8.99x10^9 m/F, the charge q1
On Oct 23, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
This is to examine the feasibility that gravity has a role in fusion
at some distance. The Coulomb force between two particles is:
Fc = Cc * q1 * q2 / r^2
where Cc is the Coulomb constant 8.99x10^9 m/F, the charge
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity role in fusion
On Oct 23, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
Not true.
Why you say that? Do you know according to which law an
Dear Dennis Abd ul-Rahman Lomax,
For a few years - you have been a great fan of New Energy Times. You have
been militant and aggressive on Wikipedia in your support of New Energy
Times and you were instrumental in getting New Energy Times removed from
the Wikipedia blacklist. You did this, I
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity role in fusion
On Oct 23, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
Not true.
Why you say that? Do you know according to which law
Steven Krivit wrote:
. . . it's rather fascinating to see the intensity of the response
to my release of the belief in single-step D+D 4He as the dominant
underlying explanatory process of LENR. Really emotional, hostile responses.
Nobody believes in single step D+D - 4He. That would
What about the acceleration at the very center of the earth, I know It cancels
but is time dilated even slower than on the surface or does dilation cancel too?
Regards
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy [mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 1:02 PM
To:
Re: correction /Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary
Resistive Wire Carrying a Constant Current
mixent wrote
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:19:58 -0700
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:59:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Well Harry, I've done my best. I have nothing more
-Scientists speak out re. the President's visit to MIT/ valid concerns
comments viewpoints-Economics is a 'hard science also.'
exerpt: But the 'pro-science/pro Energy' route is an absolutely good for an
administration intent on getting R D projects turned into real and pervasive
Steven Krivit wrote:
Bottom line, as far as I see it, I don't think there is any way to
report ugly facts without experiencing some kind of blowback.
The facts you have reported lately are not ugly. They are trivial, or
private and unrelated to cold fusion, or imaginary. You will not be
Also, by the way, by no stretch of the imagination would I describe
this as outrage, a vicious attack, or a threat:
Those who support his work should pay close attention, if he can't
be guided through this, it's going down the tubes. The tide is
turning, CF is becoming respectable, and
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity role in fusion
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity role in
On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity role in fusion
On Oct 23, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
Not true.
Why you
Hi, Abd al-Rahman,
Many thanks for your response and comments.
I read your account of your own evolution in thinking with great interest.
It is always nice to see someone thinking and acting together, with both
evolving.
I do like your idea of kits. I assume these kits would be less
Yes, you got it.
I would distinguish between 'dedicated skeptics' -- people who have a vested
interest in being opposed to something, and those who have yet to be
convinced and will be somewhat hard-nosed about accepting new perspectives
on something. Perhaps this latter group constitutes, say,
The November 2008 issue of Scientific American has two articles about
subjects dear to my heart:
M. Z. Jacobson and M. A. Delucchi, A Path To Sustainable Energy
2030. This describes how the U.S. could transition to fully
sustainable energy, as follows:
Water (tidal, geothermal and
OK here's Newton's law of gravitation defined:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_universal_gravitation
When bodies are large with respect to the distance between them, or
even overlap, forces on every tiny volume of a given body are
computed as the sum of forces over many small
OK here's Newton's law of gravitation defined:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_universal_gravitation
When bodies are large with respect to the distance between them, or
even overlap, forces on every tiny volume of a given body are
computed as the sum of forces over many small
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity role in fusion
- Original Message -
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity role
Here is Aya's report on the prez's visit, with photos and a link to the text
and video of his speech, which was not bad:
http://ayarothwell.blogspot.com/2009/10/obama-at-mit.html
The link to the text goes here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/24/us/politics/24obama.text.html
Regrettably, the
On Oct 23, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
OK here's Newton's law of gravitation defined:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_universal_gravitation
When bodies are large with respect to the distance between them, or
even overlap, forces on every tiny volume of a given body are
Let me describe this in a more organized fashion. Profs may be guilty of a
whole spectrum of misbehavior, ranging from trivial to reprehensible. I have
no idea where on this scale de Bivort's friend is, so it is unfair for me to
condemn him. I am just using him a hypothetical example. As I see it,
It is interesting what might happen if a tiny black hole is created.
By my theory of gravimagnetics, both the near field Coulomb force and
near field magnetic forces would be felt outside the black hole. By
standard theory the effect of charge would disappear, leaving only
gravity. Rs,
On Oct 23, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:33 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity role in fusion
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hmm two sources of gravity come to
31 matches
Mail list logo
